GB-CHC-1038860-P-8801-270
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. The project is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of their “Dialogue and Dissent” programme.
Our global goals are: Equal access to HIV-related services; sexual and reproductive health and rights for those most affected by HIV; equal and full rights for Key Populations; and strong civil society organisations are successful HIV advocates. Specific long-term outcomes include: 1) With critical mass of support, civil society holds government to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services. 2) Enabling legal and policy frameworks that are adequately resourced and implemented.
This partnership reaches sex workers, people who use drugs, men who have sex with men, transgender people, adolescent girls, and young women in nine different countries: Indonesia, Kenya, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nigeria, Uganda, Ukraine, Vietnam and Zimbabwe. In addition, a regional approach is adopted for Southern Africa and Eastern Europe/Central Asia to deliver policy work and capacity building at regional level.
Aids Fonds - STOP AIDS NOW!
Health Global Access Project Inc. (Health GAP)
Frontline AIDS
International Civil Society Support (ICSS)
Harm Reduction International (HRI)
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
Netherlands- Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
+44(0)1273718900
mail@frontlineaids.org
http://www.frontlineaids.org
3164043
4090101
4445070
4486647
3904139
601619.63
75000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
75000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
75000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
4782.6
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asian Network of People who Use Drugs (ANPUD)
73570
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
1260.44
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asian Network of People who Use Drugs (ANPUD)
300000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Robert Carr Fund
13381
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Health GAP
96402.89
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Civil Society Support (ICSS)
41274.22
62628.03
124412.64
88858.3
58302.29
125708.36
899404
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
1187067
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
120000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Civil Society Support (ICSS)
26148
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
TackleAfrica
31760
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
188584.13
44393
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
HRI
71555
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
IDPC
22250
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
IDPC
25000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International CSO/PTN35
300000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
RCNF
10261
Frontline AIDS
ARASA
204890
52228.38
Frontline AIDS
IDPC
6053.98
Frontline AIDS
International CSO/PTN31
2478374
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ARASA
250080
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International CSO/PTN31
4585
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tackle Africa
403613.71
22043.49
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International CSO/PTN02
20349.99
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International CSO/PTN10
45015.23
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
IDPC
9569.73
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
IDPC
2792.47
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN18
10847.43
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tackle Africa
604853.26
232069.95
731383.67
Frontline AIDS
ARASA
6732
Frontline AIDS
HRI
25000
Frontline AIDS
International CSO/PTN35
29682.06
Frontline AIDS
IDPC
75135.4
Frontline AIDS
International CSO/PTN31
4623.77
Frontline AIDS
Tackle Africa
304712.46
19017.21
Frontline AIDS
Regional CSO/PTN02
662385.02
Frontline AIDS
Regional CSO/PTN37
220696.79
300000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Robert Carr Fund
3570.87
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
NoBox
3045985
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
2379601
AidsFonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
18629.39
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Harm Reduction International (HRI)
300000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Robert Carr Fund
21262
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Health GAP
50000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ARASA
21000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Health Global Access Project Inc. (Health GAP)
9019.59
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
49653.57
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Harm Reduction International (HRI)
20090000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
2475.69
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
64999.86
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
4770.94
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
25543.11
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Harm Reduction International (HRI)
65183.99
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
30000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Health Global Access Project Inc. (Health GAP)
10098
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
25984
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
40500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
300000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Robert Carr Fund
10098
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
25984
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
81000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
300000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Robert Carr Fund
25000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ARASA
9238.07
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Health Global Access Project Inc. (Health GAP)
13097
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
TackleAfrica
13233
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
49890
Frontline AIDS
IDPC
414910.93
Frontline AIDS
ARASA
163019.59
441743208
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
32280
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional CSO/PTN02
1104581
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional CSO/PTN37
4661.67
Frontline AIDS
Regional CSO/PTN02
0
Frontline AIDS
ARASA
948542.96
Frontline AIDS
ARASA
21305
Frontline AIDS
International CSO/PTN36
17329.58
Frontline AIDS
HRI
36034.76
Frontline AIDS
International CSO/PTN12
23641.41
Frontline AIDS
IDPC
-9569.73
Frontline AIDS
IDPC
9569.73
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN18
51380.91
Frontline AIDS
International CSO/PTN31
2070015
Frontline AIDS
ARASA
75980
Frontline AIDS
International CSO/PTN31
507977.43
Frontline AIDS
Regional CSO/PTN37
46066.89
Frontline AIDS
Regional CSO/PTN37
15528
Frontline AIDS
Regional CSO/PTN37
2963.91
Frontline AIDS
Regional CSO/PTN02
669788.01
12918.8
Frontline AIDS
IDPC
876114.54
Frontline AIDS
ARASA
53901.4
Frontline AIDS
International CSO/PTN31
1500000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
2113894
Aidsfonds
Frontline AIDS
2902766
Aidsfonds
2287372
Aidsfonds
300000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
300000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
75000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
75000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
75000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
75000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
75000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
75000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
75000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
75000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
75000
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
2073011
Aidsfonds
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
PITCH Annual Report 2016
PITCH Annual Report 2017
PITCH Annual Report 2018
Web link to Frontline AIDS description of PITCH
PITCH Annual Report 2019
GB-CHC-1038860-29245
Frontline AIDS
Resilient & Empowered Adolescents & Young People, READY+
READY+ is a four-year programme in southern Africa that will reach 30,000 adolescents and young people living with HIV in Mozambique, Swaziland, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe. READY+ is funded by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Maputo, and led by Frontline AIDS in partnership with Y+, AFRICAID/Zvandiri, AIDS Legal Network (ALN), Coordinating Assembly of NGOs in Swaziland (CANGO), Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+), M&C Saatchi World Services, Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA), the Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI) and Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE).
The programme will rely on both evidence-based and innovative solutions. 30,000 young people will receive HIV and SRHR education, and 10,000 will be supported by peers, resulting in resilient and empowered young people who are better informed and make healthier choices. 8,000 young people will access high quality integrated HIV/SRHR and mental health services, leading to improved initiation of and retention on ARV treatment. 400 young people will participate in local, national, and global HIV/SRHR advocacy activities to address structural barriers to accessing SRH services and realising their sexual and reproductive rights.
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
AFRICAID
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
Stichting Global Network of Young People Y+Global
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
mail@aidsalliance.org
http://www.aidsalliance.org/our-priorities/current-projects/831-resilient-empowered-adolescents-and-young-people-ready
225874
2680494
3115932
2765951
2817191
1101209
54223
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
137517.97
448713.63
50088.23
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
281696.28
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
29634.96
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
85631.34
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
83305.76
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
308555.8
135509
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
83225
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
890228
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
279785
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
1473340.1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
212112.89
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
185104.89
27367.88
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
1100986
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
1339348.00
Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Maputo
GB-CHC-1038860-29245
58388.49
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
-266184
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
271029
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
21918.78
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
595001.11
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
53542.84
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
2219156
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
337065
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
33929000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
34285.65
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
534751
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
146932
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
10000
Africaid
70000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
30673
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
46600.65
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
91264.99
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
442456.55
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
170122.84
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
123178226
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
37623.56
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
66612.88
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
160229901
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
94016.76
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
73812.22
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
139146.03
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
77083.48
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
87429150
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
78132
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
2154273
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
175670
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
307079
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
226129190
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
-241658.11
Adjustment due to conversion from ZAR to USD
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
1058279
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
48491.91
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
21663.01
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
-375178.23
Adjustment due to conversion from ZAR to USD
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
203631
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
190113
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
12394680
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
-241658.11
Adjustment due to conversion from ZAR to USD
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
17353
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
44326
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
173816
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
197888.1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
160559.04
143229
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
193058
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
213574.22
40940
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
181636963
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
160598.77
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
86264
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
81400
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
36736
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
335938.64
74528
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
2241173
Fifth Instalment of Buza READYPLUS Budget
Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Maputo
Frontline AIDS (formerly International HIV/AIDS Alliance)
647236
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
9927770
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
53208
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
139927
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
136926
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
38887
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
13635000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
49082269
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
176791.3
109158
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
109158
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
45624
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
49082269
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
168530.21
194940.47
52452
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
16821.15
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
218915.97
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
643128.15
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
335877.74
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
56703
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
12960.41
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
3605
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
2869642
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
140287
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
100469
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
696728
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
460958.38
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
220869.21
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
10733.02
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
494859.91
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
152146.54
98144.64
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
52580.45
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
178460.08
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
9798.43
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
452281.83
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
98607.85
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
554878.75
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
228236
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
443775.19
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
134497.32
81927.6
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
5290357
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
1379973
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
102948
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
348428
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
102948
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
14488.77
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
183671.85
62729.1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
155400
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
1359347.00
Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Maputo
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
1896669
Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Maputo
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
123952.9
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Stichting Global Network of Young People Y+Global
96747.71
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
747385
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
211651.58
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
123952.99
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Stichting Global Network of Young People Y+Global
48925.43
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
37830.55
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
26658
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
32238
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
30414
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
55811.22
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
109071.88
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
34300.88
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
495595.9
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
123.88
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
44573
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
427310
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
190113
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
583922
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
33559
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
120598
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
731322
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
10500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
455721
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
33500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
64639081
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
73636
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
18845
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
538814
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
48624
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
18845
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
571317
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
150011561.50
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
136926
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
65801
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
801231.25
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
208564.47
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
63235
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
163471
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
281026
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
658807
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
163733
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
65032
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
1613852
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
84378
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
347305
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
38150.31
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
16083.43
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
92437.36
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
32973
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
186091.39
203474.97
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
207080.13
203631
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
-1825689.03
Adjustment due to conversion from ZAR to USD
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
29100
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
154753.14
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Africaid
1039177.94
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
379854.94
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
31581.84
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
127243.55
2134122.00
Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Maputo
GB-CHC-1038860-29245
29990.82
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
22950160
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
121319.04
-1825689.03
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
-57925.33
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
-66835960
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
23229
AfricAid
2023510
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
69379
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
629091
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
79627759
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
773402
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
23229
AfricAid
2023510
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
773402
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
69379
Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+)
629091
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
79627760
Tanzania Council for Social Development (TACOSODE)
1558000
82781.48
375178.23
International HIV/Aids Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
1454958
Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Maputo
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
READY+ Annual Narrative Report 2017
READY+ Annual Narrative Report 2018
READY+ Annual Narrative Report
READY+ Annual Narrative Report 30 April 2020
READY+ Annual Narrative Report 30 April 2020
Outcome 1: Powerful Adolescents
Resilient and empowered A&YPLHIV who are better informed and make healthier choices
1a) Percentage of A&YPLHIV surveyed who used a condom during last sexual intercourse
The baseline values were measured at the end of the programme and the overall achievement recorded.
1b) Percentage of A&YPLHIV who can correctly name at least one way in which HIV transmission can be prevented
The baseline values were measured at the end of the programme and the overall achievement recorded.
1c) Percentage of A&YPLHIV surveyed who report positive social and mental well-being
This is a composite well-being indicator where A&YPLHIV demonstrate changes in one or more area(s) relating to: feeling supported to discuss their SRHR concerns with peers, caregivers and service providers, psychosocial needs being met, selfworth, feel confident in making decisions relating to their SRHR that are healthy, consensual and unpressured. Specific components are as follows: a) Acceptance of HIV Status ? Levels of comfort with disclosure b) Feelings about starting relationships / future aspirations about getting married and having a family c) Confidence and agency in making decisions in relation to their SRHR (e.g. asking a partner to use a condom; requesting services, etc.)
The baseline values were measured at the end of the programme and the overall achievement recorded.
1d) Improved comfort of A&YPLHIV in speaking to others about HIV.
This indicator measures how A&YPLHIV are founding it easy to disclose their HIV positive status to others.
The baseline values were measured at the end of the programme and the overall achievement recorded.
1e) Percentage of improved knowledge and attitudes of A&YPLHIV about contraception
The baseline values were measured at the end of the programme and the overall achievement recorded.
1f) Percentage of A&YPLHIV who express equitable gender norms with regard to decision making around sex and relationships
The baseline values were measured at the end of the programme and the overall achievement recorded.
1g) Percentage of A&YPLHIV surveyed who demonstrate knowledge in HIV treatment
The indicator is derived from correct answers given following prompted questions in a survey. If a respondent does not correctly respond to all questions, they are not counted in the numerator of the indicator. All respondents surveyed are included in the denominator. The responses to the questions are true, false or do not know. The precise wording of the prompted questions must be given careful thought in each linguistic and cultural context. This indicator is constructed from responses to the following set of prompted questions: 1. ARV medicines cure HIV or AIDS. 2. CD4 count is the amount of HIV in the blood. 3. Viral load is the number of cells that fight HIV. 4. Antiretroviral (ARV) drugs help you live longer. 5. You should only take ARVs when you feel sick.
The baseline values were measured at the end of the programme and the overall achievement recorded.
1h) Number of A&YPLHIV participating in group safe spaces (community or facility based) led by peer supporters where they learn about issues relating to SRHR and HIV.
This is a core coverage indicator on participation in spaces which are peer led/owned where young people can discuss issues related to sex and sexuality openly. Indicator counts the number of young people reached by CATS/peer supporters with group based interpersonal communication on puberty, relationships, sex, sexual health or HIV (includes topics such as disclosure, contraception choices, sex and relationships, psychosocial well-being) in the reporting period in safe spaces. Examples of safe spaces: a) Small group discussions in youth clubs, support groups or teen clubs. b) Educational sessions (for example, life skills education in schools) c) Online safe spaces such as Facebook or WhatsApp discussion groups This indicator DOES NOT count individuals reached through mass channels, including public events and media. Participation in an online safe spaces should be counted as the number of people who have liked, posted or commented within the time period; membership of a group alone is not sufficient.
The overall results for the period were below the set target for three of the countries mainly due to set up protocols however, Zimbabwe exceeded target.
The overall results for the period were below the set target for three of the countries however, Tanzania exceeded target.
The overall results for the period were below the set target for three of the countries however, Tanzania exceeded target.
The overall results for the period under review were surpassed.
1i) Number of A&YPLHIV receiving one to one support from peer supporters in the community
The overall results for the year surpassed the annual target
The overall results for the year surpassed the annual target
The overall results for the year surpassed the annual target
The overall results for the year surpassed the annual target
1j) Number of tools specifically tailored for A&YPLHIV published where A&YPLHIV have been involved in the design and content (including IEC materials)
This is an output indicator covering both adapted and new tools, provided that the tool has been updated/tailored through the project and young people were involved. Indicator refers to tools that would be used within support groups/youth groups, 33 etc. and therefore, use/dissemination of these tools will be indirectly counted through 1h.
This indicator was surpassed over the four years.
1k) Number of group safe spaces (community or facility based) led by peer supporters established where A&YPLHIV learn about issues relating to SRHR and HIV.
The overall results for the year were below the set annual target mainly due to difficulty in setting up new group safe spaces.
The overall results for the year were below the set annual target as the group safe spaces could not be established as planned as CATS focused on registration of new clients.
The achievement for the period under review was below target however, Tanzania exceeded its target.
The target for the year was not achieved during the period under review.
1l) Number of A&YPLHIV trained as peer supporters (both community and facility based)
The overall results for the year were below the set annual target mainly due to difficulty in recruiting the right candidates for peer supporters training.
The overall results for the year were below the set annual target mainly due to failure to conduct the peer supporters training as planned.
The overall target of 385 was exceeded by 33
An additional 30 CATS were trained in Mozambique (Pemba District: 15, Beira District: 15) in 2020.
1m) Number of active peer supporters (both community and facility based)
This indicator counts the number of individuals who have been trained as CATS (peer supporters) who are actively providing peer support in the community or in a facility (or both). Active CATS are defined as individuals that are providing services to A&YPLHIV either in the community or health facility and their activities are documented in the Schedule Plan at least for three weeks within a reporting month. The following are the factors to be considered for active CATS: 1. An active CATS will need to be actively participating in project activities. 2. Depending on the arrangement with the facility/implementing partner that he/she is attached to, the CATS member will be at the facility for a period of not less than 3 days a week. 3. One will seize to be an active CATS when they turn 24 years and hence will be documented as inactive. 4. A CATS will seize to be active if they have relocated and can no longer execute their duties as prescribed and agreed upon between them and the facilities/implementing partner that they support. 5. A CATS is considered active if they are submitting their monthly Schedule Plan (Standard of Care) completed with all contacts of clients conducted during the period. (Please note these numbers are cumulative & in Zimbabwe, given the significant number of CATS already trained by implementing partners in-country, we will be working with existing CATS and providing refresher trainings to strengthen their capacity to deliver for A&YPLHIV)
The annual target increased due to the additional number of CATS that were trained in Mozambique. The attrition rate increased to 38% from 23% in the previous year.
Outcome 2: Supportive and Safe Communities
Safe communities that promote the rights, health and well-being of A&YPLHIV and support their access to SRHR information, services and commodities
2a) Percentage of A&YPLHIV surveyed who report receiving more youth friendly services and better treatment in clinics.
The indicator aims to measure whether the SRHR messages and information that young people receive actually responds to their needs and rights. This can only be ascertained with a prior understanding of what A&YPLHIV needs and priorities they have in relation to information and support about their SRHR (and other priorities). The indicator therefore covers several areas: (Note: this is to be further defined during the course of programming)
The baseline values were measured at the end of the programme and the overall achievement recorded.
2b) Perceptions of stigma and discrimination experienced by A&YPLHIV on the basis of their HIV status.
The baseline values were measured at the end of the programme and the overall achievement recorded.
2c) Community members surveyed expressing accepting attitudes towards A&YPLHIV
The baseline values were measured at the end of the programme and the overall achievement recorded.
2d) Percentage of community members expressing gender equitable norms
The baseline values were measured at the end of the programme and the overall achievement recorded.
2e) Degree and quality of stakeholder response to issues raised by A&YPLHIV
This indicator will measure the response from key stakeholder groups to a range of different issues raised with key stakeholders (parents, teachers, service providers, police, community gatekeepers, decision-makers) through activities including community dialogues and community intervention action plans and the stakeholder response.
This indicator was measured at the end of the programme.
2f) Percentage of parents / caregivers trained who report increased levels of comfort and confidence in talking about SRHR and HIV topics with their child
This indicator will measure the response from key stakeholder groups to a range of different issues raised with key stakeholders (parents, teachers, service providers, police, community gatekeepers, decision-makers) through activities including community dialogues and community intervention action plans and the stakeholder response.
This indicator was not measured quantitatively as the implementation of the activities measuring this indicator were reconfigured, and therefore, this was measured qualitatively.
2g) Community dialogues and other community interventions conducted
The target was not achieved during this period.
The target was surpassed.
The target was not achieved during this period.
The target was surpassed during this period.
2h) Number of people taking part in community dialogues and other community interventions, and sensitized to reduce stigma and discrimination
The overall results for the year surpassed the annual target as country teams reached more community members than expected particularly in Mozambique.
The overall results for the year surpassed the annual target as country teams reached more community members than expected particularly in Mozambique.
The overall results for the year surpassed the annual target as country teams reached more community members than expected particularly in Mozambique.
The annual target was surpassed.
2i) Community action plans developed and implemented
The achievement against the target was 58%
2j) Parents / caregivers trained
The country teams will require conducting more parents/caregivers training sessions.
The target for this period was achieved.
The target for this period was achieved.
The target for this period was achieved.
Outcome 3: Access to high quality adolescent tailored HIV/SRHR services
Increased access to, and use of, high quality HIV and SRHR services by A&YPLHIV that are responsive to their specific needs.
3a) Number of A&YPLHIV who have received at least 1 HIV care and support, 1 SRHR and 1 psychosocial service in the health facility
The overall results for the year surpassed the annual target as the country teams particularly in Zimbabwe and Tanzania reached more AYPLHIV within facilities.
The overall results for the year surpassed the annual target as the country teams particularly in Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Tanzania reached more AYPLHIV within health facilities.
The target for this period was achieved.
The target for this period was achieved.
3b) Number of completed referrals made by peers, community or other service delivery points for A&YPLHIV to access HIV / SRHR / mental health services
The overall results for the year were below the annual target as partners were undertaking the processes with government to make use of the national MoH Referral forms.
The overall results for the year surpassed the annual target
The overall results for the year surpassed the annual target as the teams were now ensuring all the AYPLHIV were referred to services.
The target for this period was achieved.
3d) Levels of satisfaction reported by A&YPLHIV of the quality, responsiveness, appropriateness and respectfulness of SRHR and HIV services they have used
This indicator measures the levels of satisfaction of A&YPLHIV as a critical component of quality SRHR and HIV services that they receive both at community and health facility level. The perception of an A&YPLHIV on the service provider's performance is measured to determine whether it meets or exceeds his or her expectations. This indicator assesses the levels of client satisfaction in the following areas: a) Did the client feel welcome in all areas of the clinic (reception, waiting room, consulting room, etc.)? ? What service was the client seeking? b) Did the client get the service s/he came for? c) Were they offered any other services? (which? Refer to package) d) Did the provider talk about any topics related to SRHR (which, refer to prompts)? e) Did the client feel that the main service provider listened to them? f) Did the service they received fully respond to their needs? g) Does the client feel that the service provider will keep their issues confidential? h) Was the client treated with respect by the service provider? i) Did the client feel that the service provider was judging them in any way? ? Did the client feel the service provider was interested in his/her challenges? ? Did the client feel that s/he had enough time to discuss their concerns? j) In what ways (if any) could this experience have been improved
All countries with the exception of Tanzania achieved supassed the target of 70% at follow up in 2020.
3e) Service providers trained demonstrating improved knowledge and attitudes towards A&YPLHIV, their needs and rights
All countries achieved the target.
3f) Service sites successfully actioned their service improvement plans
This indicator measures the number of clinics who have implemented at least 70% of their service improvement plans, 12 months after developing them. Monitoring as per their service improvement plan, with written progress every 6 months. Baseline for this indicator is the number of facilities supported to develop service improvement plans
Overall, 75% of facilities successfully implemented their QIPs, with activities focussing on integrated service provision, client satisfaction and adherence and retention were all achieved.
3g) Number of services accredited by A&YPLHIV meeting quality standards
The accreditation activity did not happen as expected as the Ministry of Health in Zimbabwe expressed unwillingness in having services being accredited in this way, and this was applied to all the countries.
3h) Number of service providers taking part in peer to peer learning and exchange
This is an output indicator counting the number of service providers (including those working for facility-based organizations and CBOs) who received technical assistance (TA) to increase their technical and programmatic capacity to deliver quality psychosocial care and support. TA can be provided in the form of training, receipt of package of materials, modules and aids on how to provide quality psychosocial support and/or mentoring. The indicator is cumulative, meaning that each reporting period the number of service providers who were trained during that period for the first time are added to the cumulative total reported during the last period. People who were trained both in the reporting period and previously should be counted just once. It is important to note that these are not only the trained staff from PATA-supported facilities, but also individuals from organisations which this information is cascaded to through learning. Some of the examples include PATA forum, involvement in a WhatsApp group, dialogues, network calls etc. As part of measuring service quality, participant feedback (i.e. levels of satisfaction) should be collected as part of the of the TA sessions, and can be used for narrative reporting against this indicator.
No peer-to-peer learning was recorded during this period.
The target was achieved during this period.
The target was achieved during this period.
The target was achieved during this period.
3i) Number of A&YPLHIV who are involved in designing, monitoring and accrediting services
90% of the target was achieved.
The target was achieved during this period.
The target was achieved during this period.
3j) Number of service sites with a service improvement plan
There were facilities added to the target which increased to 28 and the achievement was 93% during this period.
Outcome 4: Accountability
Greater accountability of decision makers and policy makers to the SRHR needs of A&YPLHIV
4a) Number of documented positive changes to policy environment that READY+ has contributed towards.
The target was not achieved as expected.
4b) Advocacy log shows evidence of the programme influencing supportive or changing attitudes among decision makers
The target was not achieved as expected.
4c) Reports and case studies published and disseminated locally, nationally and regionally analysing gaps, needs, risks and lessons learnt, and promising practices for A&YPLHIV
The reports and case studies were not published per country but at consortium level
4d) Number of A&YPLHIV participating in local, national, and global SRH/HIV advocacy activities
This indicator counts A&YPLHIV involved in policy and advocacy. The indicator tracks active involvement of young people, e.g. holding youth dialogues/consultations, speaking at meetings, meetings with decision makers, submitting written contributions or other forms of inputting into policy processes. For each activity a documented description of who the intended audience was, the key messages, the expected short-term and intermediate outcomes and the actual results made should be provided, as well as what message was included. It is important to record specific inputs / contributions, as well as reach and audience. Advocacy activities could be at national, sub-national, regional or international levels (e.g. participating in Global Fund country dialogues, and/or workshops to strengthen engagement in GF processes); meetings with key decision makers; conferences; UNAIDS initiatives, etc. These activities will be defined by advocacy strategies at the national, regional and global levels.
The target was not achieved as expected.
The target was surpassed.
Mozambique has had the least number of AYPLHIV participating in local, national, and global SRH/HIV advocacy activities as there was no active network of young people living with HIV.
The target was surpassed.
4e) Youth leaders supported and mentored to advocate for their needs and rights
The target was surpassed.
The target was surpassed.
The target was surpassed.
The target was not achieved as expected.
GB-CHC-1038860-P-8801-270-KE
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Kenya Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. The project is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of their “Dialogue and Dissent” programme. In Kenya we focus on reducing stigma and discrimination, increasing awareness on the rights and needs of KPs and AGYW, lobbying for policy change, and coalition building.
Country-specific long-term outcomes include: 1) The full continuum of HIV and SRHR services are accessible, available and acceptable country-wide for key populations (KPs) and adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). 2) Meaningful engagement of KP and AGYW-led CSOs with government and other duty bearers in decision-making processes for protecting and promoting health and rights for KPs and AGYW. 3) Full implementation of laws, policies and systems, with strong monitoring and accountability mechanisms, promoting and protecting KPs and AGYW. 4) Reduced criminalisation for KPs, and reduced human rights violations for AGYW as a result of a functional, accessible, informed and responsive law and justice system.
In Kenya, Frontline AIDS's target groups are: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people (LGBTI), people who inject drugs (PWUD) and adolescent girls and young women.
Aids Fonds - STOP AIDS NOW! - Soa Aids Nederland
Frontline AIDS
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO)
Health Global Access Project Inc. (Health GAP)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
+44(0)1273718900
mail@frontlineaids.org
https://frontlineaids.org/
231359
300000
350000
350000
280825
12250.4
13582368
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
5396574
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
1453438.5
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
61203895.24
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
5404432
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local / National CSO
6085708.17
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
901871
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
2775080
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KP Consortium
53670506
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
LVCT
3447.3
21678.93
44760928
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
1928716
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN19
27264565.02
Frontline AIDS
LVCT
3.09
36.34
2291.43
42.08
7066.52
18530.5
3153378
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local / National CSO
18699518.75
Frontline AIDS
LVCT
7753.57
Frontline AIDS
LVCT
756240
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN38
10027.18
2323.01
5586
3684990.66
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
12291041
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
41437.21
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
34145.55
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
70276.66
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
1757744.56
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
75000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
30569062
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
21865290.25
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
1590508
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
969962
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local / National CSO
12445531
Frontline Aids
LVCT
8930987
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
LVCT
10076267.55
Frontline AIDS
LVCT
1252.05
47596808
Frontline AIDS
LVCT
12602786
Frontline AIDS
LVCT
1531.44
3408.15
4215533.66
Frontline AIDS
LVCT
1392742.5
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN38
22711.91
Frontline AIDS
LVCT
2948.195556
Frontline Aids
9765656
Frontline Aids
LVCT
18606822
Frontline Aids
LVCT
5252.293333
14158944
Frontline Aids
LVCT
-125500
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN38
2929.93
S1: (Self) Stigma addressed
For this outcome Stigma refers to both the internal stigma (self-stigma) experienced and expressed by KPs and AGYW themselves, as well as
external stigma and discrimination expressed by decision makers and those with widespread influence (government, media etc) as well as communities, religious and traditional leaders, service providers, families etc toward KPs and AGYW. This outcome focuses on achieving changes in the beliefs, attitudes and behaviour of those who express this external stigma and discrimination, in the hope that KPs and AGYW experience less stigma and discrimination because of their HIV status and/or gender and sexuality over the course of PITCH. Our assumption is that as levels of external stigma reduce, incidences of self-stigma also reduce, contributing to an increase in public demand for access to HIV-related services for KPs and AGYW.
IndS1.1 (LGBT): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KP and AGYW on an issue or claim
Among MSM, stigmatizing and discriminatory attitudes were reported to be high, especially from the police, some religious leaders, health workers, teaching institutions and chiefs among others. Experiences included forced evictions, disclosure of sexual orientation, job termination, and refusal of services, verbal insults, forced examinations, physical assault, blackmail and demand for sexual favours.
IndS1.1 (PWUD) Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KP and AGYW on an issue or claim
Among PWUD (people who use drugs), stigmatizing and discriminatory attitudes were expressed mostly by law enforcement officers, in the form of arbitrary arrests, harassment and demand for cash bribes. It was also reported that the stigmatizing and discriminatory attitudes and behaviours have worsened over the years.
IndS1.2 (LGBT): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
No data collected in 2017
IndS1.2 (PWUD): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
S4: Engagement among stakeholders intensified
This outcome is designed to track the progress of PITCH partners in increasing their level of interaction with national level CSOs; social
justice networks; local, district and national level authorities; and international organisations including AU, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and WHO. We are
looking to better understand how PITCH is having an impact on the ability of partners to confidently engage in dialogue and collaborate with a range of
stakeholders that have an influence over changes in policy and practice in relations to meeting the needs of KPS and AGYW. Changes in the levels of
interaction are measured through the number of meetings etc between implementing partners and the stakeholders referred to here where advocacy is
carried out. Through this outcome we also seek to understand changes in the level of capacity and confidence to advocate with country, regional and
global level advocacy targets, and the impact this has on changes in levels of engagement between PITCH partners and these same stakeholders.
IndS4.1 (LGBT): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.1 (PWUD): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
M2: Advocacy targets engaged
This outcome focuses on the experiences of PITCH partners when engaging advocacy targets that can influence decision-making processes. These advocacy targets will be global, regional, national, or local government representatives and politicians, as well as religious and traditional leaders and the police etc. We are looking for evidence of these advocacy targets listening to local and national civil society, including youth and KP-led organisations. We are also looking for evidence of these advocacy targets amending or introducing new policies and encouraging practice and behaviour that responds to the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. Moreover, we are looking to draw connections between the increased capacity of PITCH partners and the effective engagement of these advocacy targets.
IndM2.2 (LGBT): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.2 (PWUD): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.3 (LGBT): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
IndM2.3 (PWUD): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
M1: Inclusive coalitions organised
This outcome is focused on helping PITCH country partners to contribute toward the strengthening of coalitions that they are members of, by making these coalitions more inclusive of CSOs and others who advocate on behalf of KPs and AGYW. Where relevant coalitions do not already exist, PITCH helps partners to develop the skills they need in order to establish and facilitate coalitions that function effectively, have clear advocacy strategies in place, and that are genuinely inclusive. Inclusivity is measured both in terms of the coalitions’ membership as well as their ability to articulate the needs, rights and concerns of KPs and AGYW. We are measuring progress in line with this focus. We hope that by helping coalitions to become increasingly strategic, effective and inclusive that we will see evidence of increased collaboration among PITCH partners and coalition members as well as the enhanced coordination of advocacy activities with aligned messaging.
IndM1.1 (LGBT): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.1 (PWUD): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (LGBT): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (PWUD): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
M3: Demand for services and rights increased
This outcome relates to PITCH partners, through their advocacy work, having a measurable, positive impact on the ability of KPs and AGYW to enjoy the same human rights (with specific reference to equality of access to HIV-related services as well as access to broader SRHR rights) as others in their community and wider society. With this outcome we hope that PITCH advocacy will contribute to changes in government policy and practice that will enable communities and civil society to express themselves, be more active and access resources. We also want to achieve a change in the way that governments see themselves, and to reach a point where governments recognise their roles as primary duty bearers, and are willing to be held accountable by people living with HIV, marginalised people and wider civil society groups.
IndM3.1 (LGBT): Number of rights violation cases against KPs and AGYW brought to court
IndM3.1 (PWUD): Number of rights violation cases against KPs and AGYW brought to court
IndM3.2 (LGBT): Number of detentions/arrests of LGBT community members
IndM3.2 (PWUD): Number of detentions/arrests of PWUD community members
L2: Enabling legal and policy frameworks that are adequately resourced and implemented
With this outcome we want to understand the contribution of PITCH to legislation, and the implementation of this legislation, that is supportive of the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. This might involve the introduction of new policy and legislation in support of KPs and AGYW, as well as the blocking or retraction of laws and policies that restrict or prevent KPs and AGWY from accessing the services to which they have a right. We will look for evidence of decriminalisation, and of governments implementing existing laws and policies where they exist. Examples of new laws and policies might include, in Uganda, the implementation of the Antinarcotic Act, HIV Control Act, or Public Management Act, SRHR guidelines. In terms of reversing the application of restrictive laws and policies, this might include the removal of administrative sanctions (monetary penalties), which was reported in the context of Sex Workers in Ukraine.
IndL2.1 (LGBT): # of Policies formally proposed/accepted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies etc)
None - Most policies that this community group participated in are represented under cross-cutting policies
IndL2.1 (PWUD): # of Policies formally proposed/accepted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies etc)
KENPUD contributed to the development of the Kenya National Guidelines for Standard Operating Procedures for Medically Assisted Therapy for People who use drugs in 2013. The specific issues that the guidelines sought to address were hinged on the conviction that PWUDs have an addiction, and many are struggling to sustain it due to the costs involved and the fact that most do not have steady incomes.
KENPUD worked in partnership with members of the KP consortium to dialogue with the government and present the PWUD issues and their vulnerability to HIV infection. The guidelines have the potential to impact positively to the lives of PWUDs through the syringe and needle programme PWUD will be protected from infection resulting from sharing of needles. Through the methadone programme PWUDs are supported to reduce dependence on drugs
Among the challenges experienced by KENPUD in championing for this guidelines is that some stakeholders do not take organisations like KENPUD seriously; hence pushing for their agenda to be heard and addressed is met with non-committal responses. KENPUD has capacity challenges in development of policies, evidence gathering and advocacy. Therefore there is a need to build the capacity of KENDUP and other PWUD organisations, especially in the areas of research, policy development and mobilisation of resources for more effective advocacy.
IndL2.2 (LGBT): # of Policies formally blocked/retracted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies)
Chapter 63 of the Penal Code: The law criminalises unlawful sexual connection as a felony that attracts a sentence of up to three years imprisonment. The lack of definition of unlawful sexual connection provides ambiguity that criminalizes same sex relationships. This makes the activities of Men who have sex with men (MSM) and Male Sex Workers (MSW) at risk of being subjected to unlawful detention and even imprisonment. The Penal Code encourages society to stigmatize and discriminate against MSM and MSW due to their activities. It further denies them the right to access SRHR and HIV services. The following laws/policies/guidelines have the potential of meeting the needs of KPs and AGYW as long as there is fidelity in their implementation. They include laws/policies/guidelines that cut across the key populations and priority populations that include adolescent girls and young women.
IndL2.2 (PWUD): # of Policies formally blocked/retracted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies)
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act of 1994: KELIN, KENPUD and KHRN were keen on following through the process of repealing certain sections of this law that criminalize drug use. This law criminalises PWUD and does not provide clear guidance on drug traffickers and users. The law is discriminatory, targeting PWUD, and serves to increase their incarceration and stigmatisation, making it hard for them to access health and other services. The law also contravenes the Kenya National Guidelines for Standard Operating Procedures for Medically Assisted Therapy for people who use drugs (PWUDs) 2013, which provides clean syringes and needles to the injecting drug users, while police continue to arrest and charge those providing these services under the law.
IndL2.3 (LGBT): # of policies/ laws/strategies currently being implemented to meet the needs of KPs and AGYW as a result of programme contribution
IndL2.3 (PWUD): # of policies/ laws/strategies currently being implemented to meet the needs of KPs and AGYW as a result of programme contribution
L1: With critical mass of support, civil society holds governments to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services
This outcome is concerned with achieving a long-term increase in the influence of civil society over government policy and funding of the national HIV response and, fundamentally, a reduction in barriers faced by Key Populations and AGYW to accessing services. Through this outcome PITCH will seek to achieve increased political commitment for HIV and SRHR services that target KPs and AGYW, and to develop the capacity of PITCH country partners to hold governments to account for the implementation of policies and other political commitments at all levels. With this outcome we hope to achieve a more informed and organised movement of community-led CSOs (KPs and AGYW) working together and engaging decision/opinion/policy makers, health care providers, religious leaders etc towards improving HIV and SRHR services (including implementation – funding, decriminalization, promoting harm reduction) for KPs and AGYW.
IndL1.1 (LGBT): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.1 (PWUD): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL1.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
S2: Advocacy agenda set
This outcome focuses on demonstrating the changing capacities of PITCH partners to influence the advocacy agenda in their countries in
relation to the specific advocacy asks and rights of KPs and AGYW. The ability to influence and ‘set’ advocacy agendas is based on the ability to develop
evidence-based, strategic and targeted advocacy plans and activities that include clear recommendations for decision makers and other advocacy
targets.
IndS2.1 (LGBT): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.1 (PWUD): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
IndS2.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
S3: Enhanced capacity to capture evidence
This outcome focuses on demonstrating increased capacity among PITCH partners to collect and use evidence (e.g. through reviews of reports
and other public documents, research using interviews and surveys, capturing data through monitoring activities etc) to inform their advocacy. It is
important that the focus of partners’ reporting is on explaining in what ways their capacity to document evidence has improved, and what they have done
with this evidence. This should be described and analysed by partners from the perspective of planning and implementing their advocacy. Where partners
feel that their evidence-based advocacy has contributed toward a change in policy, when reporting against the indicators below, please provide evidence
that illustrates how your advocacy contributed to this policy change.
IndS3.1 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.1 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.2 (LGBT): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
IndS3.2 (PWUD): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
GB-CHC-1038860-P-8801-270-MZ
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Mozambique Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. The project is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of their “Dialogue and Dissent” programme. In Mozambique, key advocacy interventions include sensitisation campaigns on the rights and needs of LGBT, sex workers and adolescent girls and young women (AGYW), informed by a body of evidence on stigma, discrimination and SRHR- and human rights violations experience by the key populations and AGYW and supported by successful champions.
Country-specific long-term outcomes include: 1) Strong, mobilised communities work together with community leaders and service providers to reduce violence and stigma affecting key populations (KPs) and women and girls (AGYW). 2) Supportive rights-based legislation is established and enforced. 3) All KPs and AGYW have access to friendly and appropriate integrated health services.
In Mozambique, Frontline AIDS's target groups are: lesbian and bisexual women, people who inject drugs (PWUD) and adolescent girls and young women.
Aids Fonds - STOP AIDS NOW!
Frontline AIDS
LAMBDA
Health Global Access Project Inc. (HealthGAP)
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
Associação Comunitária Ambiente da Mafalala (ACAM)
Regi onal Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
+44(0)1273718900
mail@frontlineaids.org
https://frontlineaids.org/
36852
183327
230250
230000
200000
2500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rede Nacional Sobre Droga & HIV/SIDA (UNIDOS)
35000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
12680.55
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
LAMBDA
2500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Associação Comunitária Ambiente da Mafalala (ACAM)
4500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Associação Comunitária Ambiente da Mafalala (ACAM)
10671.01
Frontline AIDS
LAMBDA
10009.15
30000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ACAM
108816
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
LAMBDA
2095317
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN29
20500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN33
27247
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN29
9691.4
33673.46
759.5700000000001
2334.34
9597.860000000001
14366.13
829.77
1142.82
688224.86
Frontline AIDS
ACAM
58658.66
Frontline AIDS
LAMBDA
474474
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN33
16047.01
2328042
Frontline AIDS
ACAM
20040
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Associação Comunitária Ambiente da Mafalala (ACAM)
19106.86
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
LAMBDA
9000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rede Nacional Sobre Droga & HIV/SIDA (UNIDOS)
9000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Associação Comunitária Ambiente da Mafalala (ACAM)
9000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Associação Comunitária Ambiente da Mafalala (ACAM)
2000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Associação Comunitária Ambiente da Mafalala (ACAM)
17072.87
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
2000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rede Nacional Sobre Droga & HIV/SIDA (UNIDOS)
17682
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
LAMBDA
107806
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
LAMBDA
36216.15
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
LAMBDA
9000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rede Nacional Sobre Droga & HIV/SIDA (UNIDOS)
14311.88
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Lambda
4500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rede Nacional Sobre Droga & HIV/SIDA (UNIDOS)
10165.16
Frontline AIDS
LAMBDA
11000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ACAM
20500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN33
448673978
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
SMUG
7835
Frontline AIDS
ACAM
597803.73
Frontline AIDS
ACAM
9487
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN29
9462.299999999999
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN33
628959.8
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN33
13642.92
2215050
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN33
3279402
Frontline AIDS
LAMBDA
965998.5
Frontline AIDS
ACAM
-1931.11
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN29
333967.98
Frontline AIDS
LAMBDA
783770
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN33
3616.49
522708
Frontline Aids
ACAM
-7036
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN29
27626.58
Frontline AIDS
LAMBDA
728345.01
Frontline AIDS
ACAM
3797.65
761279.5
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN33
476145
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN33
696806
Frontline Aids
ACAM
429245.43
Frontline Aids
LAMBDA
491493.5
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN33
12740.63
Frontline Aids
626178
Frontline Aids
ACAM
618653
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN33
-580578
Frontline Aids
LAMBDA
558872.5
Frontline Aids
ACAM
1059275.92
Frontline Aids
LAMBDA
685810
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN33
17979.94667
1113601
Frontline Aids
LAMBDA
1275165
Frontline Aids
ACAM
1500431.45
Frontline Aids
LAMBDA
4660.99
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN21
1094547.05
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN33
16435.8
S1: (Self) Stigma addressed
For this outcome Stigma refers to both the internal stigma (self-stigma) experienced and expressed by KPs and AGYW themselves, as well as
external stigma and discrimination expressed by decision makers and those with widespread influence (government, media etc) as well as communities,
religious and traditional leaders, service providers, families etc toward KPs and AGYW. This outcome focuses on achieving changes in the beliefs, attitudes
and behaviour of those who express this external stigma and discrimination, in the hope that KPs and AGYW experience less stigma and discrimination
because of their HIV status and/or gender and sexuality over the course of PITCH. Our assumption is that as levels of external stigma reduce, incidences of
self-stigma also reduce, contributing to an increase in public demand for access to HIV-related services for KPs and AGYW.
IndS1.1 (LGBT): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on issue or claim
IndS1.1 (PWUD): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on issue or claim
IndS1.2 (LGBT): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
IndS1.2 (PWUD): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
S4: Engagement among stakeholders intensified
This outcome is designed to track the progress of PITCH partners in increasing their level of interaction with national level CSOs; social
justice networks; local, district and national level authorities; and international organisations including AU, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and WHO. We are
looking to better understand how PITCH is having an impact on the ability of partners to confidently engage in dialogue and collaborate with a range of
stakeholders that have an influence over changes in policy and practice in relations to meeting the needs of KPS and AGYW. Changes in the levels of
interaction are measured through the number of meetings etc between implementing partners and the stakeholders referred to here where advocacy is
carried out. Through this outcome we also seek to understand changes in the level of capacity and confidence to advocate with country, regional and
global level advocacy targets, and the impact this has on changes in levels of engagement between PITCH partners and these same stakeholders.
IndS4.1 (LGBT): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.1 (PWUD): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
M1: Inclusive coalitions organised
This outcome is focused on helping PITCH country partners to contribute toward the strengthening of coalitions that they are members of, by making these coalitions more inclusive of CSOs and others who advocate on behalf of KPs and AGYW. Where relevant coalitions do not already exist, PITCH helps partners to develop the skills they need in order to establish and facilitate coalitions that function effectively, have clear advocacy strategies in place, and that are genuinely inclusive. Inclusivity is measured both in terms of the coalitions’ membership as well as their ability to articulate the needs, rights and concerns of KPs and AGYW. We are measuring progress in line with this focus. We hope that by helping coalitions to become increasingly strategic, effective and inclusive that we will see evidence of increased collaboration among PITCH partners and coalition members as well as the enhanced coordination of advocacy activities with aligned messaging.
IndM1.1 (LGBT): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.1 (PWUD): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (LGBT): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (PWUD): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
M2: Advocacy targets engaged
This outcome focuses on the experiences of PITCH partners when engaging advocacy targets that can influence decision-making processes. These advocacy targets will be global, regional, national, or local government representatives and politicians, as well as religious and traditional leaders and the police etc. We are looking for evidence of these advocacy targets listening to local and national civil society, including youth and KP-led organisations. We are also looking for evidence of these advocacy targets amending or introducing new policies and encouraging practice and behaviour that responds to the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. Moreover, we are looking to draw connections between the increased capacity of PITCH partners and the effective engagement of these advocacy targets.
IndM2.1 (LGBT): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
IndM2.1 (PWUD): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
IndM2.2 (LGBT): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.2 (PWUD): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.3 (LGBT): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
IndM2.3 (PWUD): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
M3: Demand for services and rights increased
This outcome relates to PITCH partners, through their advocacy work, having a measurable, positive impact on the ability of KPs and AGYW to enjoy the same human rights (with specific reference to equality of access to HIV-related services as well as access to broader SRHR rights) as others in their community and wider society. With this outcome we hope that PITCH advocacy will contribute to changes in government policy and practice that will enable communities and civil society to express themselves, be more active and access resources. We also want to achieve a change in the way that governments see themselves, and to reach a point where governments recognise their roles as primary duty bearers, and are willing to be held accountable by people living with HIV, marginalised people and wider civil society groups.
IndM3.1 (PWUD): Number of rights violation cases against KPs and AGYW brought to court
L2: Enabling legal and policy frameworks that are adequately resourced and implemented
With this outcome we want to understand the contribution of PITCH to legislation, and the implementation of this legislation, that is supportive of the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. This might involve the introduction of new policy and legislation in support of KPs and AGYW, as well as the blocking or retraction of laws and policies that restrict or prevent KPs and AGWY from accessing the services to which they have a right. We will look for evidence of decriminalisation, and of governments implementing existing laws and policies where they exist. Examples of new laws and policies might include, in Uganda, the implementation of the Antinarcotic Act, HIV Control Act, or Public Management Act, SRHR guidelines. In terms of reversing the application of restrictive laws and policies, this might include the removal of administrative sanctions (monetary penalties), which was reported in the context of Sex Workers in Ukraine.
IndL2.1 (LGBT) # of Policies formally proposed/accepted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies etc)
IndL2.1 (PWUD): # of Policies formally proposed/accepted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies etc)
S2: Advocacy agenda set
This outcome focuses on demonstrating the changing capacities of PITCH partners to influence the advocacy agenda in their countries in
relation to the specific advocacy asks and rights of KPs and AGYW. The ability to influence and ‘set’ advocacy agendas is based on the ability to develop
evidence-based, strategic and targeted advocacy plans and activities that include clear recommendations for decision makers and other advocacy
targets.
IndS2.1 (LGBT): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.1 (PWUD): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
IndS2.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
S3: Enhanced capacity to capture evidence
This outcome focuses on demonstrating increased capacity among PITCH partners to collect and use evidence (e.g. through reviews of reports
and other public documents, research using interviews and surveys, capturing data through monitoring activities etc.) to inform their advocacy. It is
important that the focus of partners’ reporting is on explaining in what ways their capacity to document evidence has improved, and what they have done
with this evidence. This should be described and analysed by partners from the perspective of planning and implementing their advocacy. Where partners
feel that their evidence-based advocacy has contributed toward a change in policy, when reporting against the indicators below, please provide evidence
that illustrates how your advocacy contributed to this policy change.
IndS3.1 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.1 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.2 (LGBT): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
IndS3.2 (PWUD): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
L1: With critical mass of support, civil society holds governments to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services
This outcome is concerned with achieving a long-term increase in the influence of civil society over government policy and funding of the national HIV response and, fundamentally, a reduction in barriers faced by Key Populations and AGYW to accessing services. Through this outcome PITCH will seek to achieve increased political commitment for HIV and SRHR services that target KPs and AGYW, and to develop the capacity of PITCH country partners to hold governments to account for the implementation of policies and other political commitments at all levels. With this outcome we hope to achieve a more informed and organised movement of community-led CSOs (KPs and AGYW) working together and engaging decision/opinion/policy makers, health care providers, religious leaders etc towards improving HIV and SRHR services (including implementation – funding, decriminalization, promoting harm reduction) for KPs and AGYW.
IndL1.2 (LGBT): Number of of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
GB-CHC-1038860-P-8801-270-IN
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Indonesia Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. The project is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of their “Dialogue and Dissent” programme. In Indonesia, our main focus areas include removing barriers to scaling up the coverage of HIV/AIDS and SRH testing and treatment and developing supportive social movements for acceptance and decriminalisation of key populations.
Country specific long-term outcomes include: 1) Inclusive and friendly HIV and SRHR services are accessible, affordable and provide appropriate services to SW, PWUD, LGBTI and AGYW. 2) Meaningful involvement of AGYW and LGBTI advocates in the national HIV and SRHR response. 3) Increased funding for PWID and AGYW programmes & CSOs from local, national and international budgets. 4) Enabling legal framework that reduces criminalisation, discrimination and violence against key populations and improves equal access to services.
In Indonesia, Frontline AIDS' target groups are: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people (LGBTI) and people who inject drugs (PWUD).
Aids Fonds - STOP AIDS NOW!
Frontline AIDS
Rumah Cemara
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
Frontline AIDS
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
+44(0)1273718900
mail@frontlineaids.org
https://frontlineaids.org/
154242
200000
267376
267376
154242
976546805.9
Frontline Aids
Rumah Cemara
3821.947778
Frontline Aids
1440223895
Frontline Aids
Rumah Cemara
1066247436
Frontline Aids
Rumah Cemara
6172.035556
2102547316
Frontline Aids
Rumah Cemara
21319.2
86758798
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
137257288
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
-1016188582
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
100261008
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
0
4485104358
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
982091240
Frontline AIDS
Rumah Cemara
1733.36
10.41
-5.16
3.56
2.18
4405.69
486.47
45.38
2164.85
8214.98
1082329758
Frontline AIDS
Rumah Cemara
3023.04
1461.74
2671650268
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
2266333414
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
2394
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
49500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
2622904471
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
2859
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
45975.28
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
46866.09
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
1864889752
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
2394
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
2859
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
41843.46
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
535064458.8
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
637239548
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
2374.85
3332213184
Frontline AIDS
Rumah Cemara
1551118844
Frontline AIDS
Rumah Cemara
572083596
Frontline AIDS
Rumah Cemara
1306.23
143716605
Frontline AIDS
Rumah Cemara
1514.73
1441765234
Frontline AIDS
Rumah Cemara
S1: (Self) Stigma addressed
For this outcome Stigma refers to both the internal stigma (self-stigma) experienced and expressed by KPs and AGYW themselves, as well as
external stigma and discrimination expressed by decision makers and those with widespread influence (government, media etc) as well as communities, religious and traditional leaders, service providers, families etc toward KPs and AGYW. This outcome focuses on achieving changes in the beliefs, attitudes and behaviour of those who express this external stigma and discrimination, in the hope that KPs and AGYW experience less stigma and discrimination because of their HIV status and/or gender and sexuality over the course of PITCH. Our assumption is that as levels of external stigma reduce, incidences of self-stigma also reduce, contributing to an increase in public demand for access to HIV-related services for KPs and AGYW.
IndS1.1 (LGBT): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.1 (PWUD): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.2 (LGBT): Percentage of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
Comment
IndS1.2 (PWUD): Percentage of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
S4: Engagement among stakeholders intensified
This outcome is designed to track the progress of PITCH partners in increasing their level of interaction with national level CSOs; social
justice networks; local, district and national level authorities; and international organisations including AU, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and WHO. We are
looking to better understand how PITCH is having an impact on the ability of partners to confidently engage in dialogue and collaborate with a range of
stakeholders that have an influence over changes in policy and practice in relations to meeting the needs of KPS and AGYW. Changes in the levels of
interaction are measured through the number of meetings etc between implementing partners and the stakeholders referred to here where advocacy is
carried out. Through this outcome we also seek to understand changes in the level of capacity and confidence to advocate with country, regional and
global level advocacy targets, and the impact this has on changes in levels of engagement between PITCH partners and these same stakeholders.
IndS4.1 (LGBT): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.1 (PWUD): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
S3: Enhanced capacity to capture evidence
This outcome focuses on demonstrating increased capacity among PITCH partners to collect and use evidence (e.g. through reviews of reports
and other public documents, research using interviews and surveys, capturing data through monitoring activities etc) to inform their advocacy. It is
important that the focus of partners’ reporting is on explaining in what ways their capacity to document evidence has improved, and what they have done
with this evidence. This should be described and analysed by partners from the perspective of planning and implementing their advocacy. Where partners
feel that their evidence-based advocacy has contributed toward a change in policy, when reporting against the indicators below, please provide evidence
that illustrates how your advocacy contributed to this policy change.
IndS3.1 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.1 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.2 (LGBT): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
IndS3.2 (PWUD): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
M2: Advocacy targets engaged
This outcome focuses on the experiences of PITCH partners when engaging advocacy targets that can influence decision-making processes. These advocacy targets will be global, regional, national, or local government representatives and politicians, as well as religious and traditional leaders and the police etc. We are looking for evidence of these advocacy targets listening to local and national civil society, including youth and KP-led organisations. We are also looking for evidence of these advocacy targets amending or introducing new policies and encouraging practice and behaviour that responds to the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. Moreover, we are looking to draw connections between the increased capacity of PITCH partners and the effective engagement of these advocacy targets.
IndM2.1 (LGBT): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
IndM2.1 (PWUD): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
IndM2.2 (LGBT): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.2 (PWUD): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.3 (LGBT): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
IndM2.3 (PWUD): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
M3: Demand for services and rights increased
This outcome relates to PITCH partners, through their advocacy work, having a measurable, positive impact on the ability of KPs and AGYW to enjoy the same human rights (with specific reference to equality of access to HIV-related services as well as access to broader SRHR rights) as others in their community and wider society. With this outcome we hope that PITCH advocacy will contribute to changes in government policy and practice that will enable communities and civil society to express themselves, be more active and access resources. We also want to achieve a change in the way that governments see themselves, and to reach a point where governments recognise their roles as primary duty bearers, and are willing to be held accountable by people living with HIV, marginalised people and wider civil society groups.
IndM3.2 (LGBT): Number of detentions/arrests of key populations (LGBT, PWUD, sex workers)
IndM3.2 (PWUD): Number of detentions/arrests of key populations (LGBT, PWUD, sex workers)
L2: Enabling legal and policy frameworks that are adequately resourced and implemented
With this outcome we want to understand the contribution of PITCH to legislation, and the implementation of this legislation, that is supportive of the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. This might involve the introduction of new policy and legislation in support of KPs and AGYW, as well as the blocking or retraction of laws and policies that restrict or prevent KPs and AGWY from accessing the services to which they have a right. We will look for evidence of decriminalisation, and of governments implementing existing laws and policies where they exist. Examples of new laws and policies might include, in Uganda, the implementation of the Antinarcotic Act, HIV Control Act, or Public Management Act, SRHR guidelines. In terms of reversing the application of restrictive laws and policies, this might include the removal of administrative sanctions (monetary penalties), which was reported in the context of Sex Workers in Ukraine.
IndL2.1 (LGBT): # of Policies formally proposed/accepted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies etc)
IndL2.1 (PWUD): # of Policies formally proposed/accepted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies etc)
IndL2.2 (LGBT): # of Policies formally blocked/retracted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies)
IndL2.2 (PWUD): # of Policies formally blocked/retracted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies)
IndL2.3 (LGBT): # of policies/ laws/strategies currently being implemented to meet the needs of KPs and AGYW as a result of programme contribution
IndL2.3 (PWUD): # of policies/ laws/strategies currently being implemented to meet the needs of KPs and AGYW as a result of programme contribution
M1: Inclusive coalitions organised
This outcome is focused on helping PITCH country partners to contribute toward the strengthening of coalitions that they are members of, by making these coalitions more inclusive of CSOs and others who advocate on behalf of KPs and AGYW. Where relevant coalitions do not already exist, PITCH helps partners to develop the skills they need in order to establish and facilitate coalitions that function effectively, have clear advocacy strategies in place, and that are genuinely inclusive. Inclusivity is measured both in terms of the coalitions’ membership as well as their ability to articulate the needs, rights and concerns of KPs and AGYW. We are measuring progress in line with this focus. We hope that by helping coalitions to become increasingly strategic, effective and inclusive that we will see evidence of increased collaboration among PITCH partners and coalition members as well as the enhanced coordination of advocacy activities with aligned messaging.
IndM1.1 (LGBT): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.1 (PWUD): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (LGBT): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (PWUD): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
S2: Advocacy agenda set
This outcome focuses on demonstrating the changing capacities of PITCH partners to influence the advocacy agenda in their countries in
relation to the specific advocacy asks and rights of KPs and AGYW. The ability to influence and ‘set’ advocacy agendas is based on the ability to develop
evidence-based, strategic and targeted advocacy plans and activities that include clear recommendations for decision makers and other advocacy
targets.
IndS2.1 (LGBT): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.1 (PWUD): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
IndS2.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
L1: With critical mass of support, civil society holds governments to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services
This outcome is concerned with achieving a long-term increase in the influence of civil society over government policy and funding of the national HIV response and, fundamentally, a reduction in barriers faced by Key Populations and AGYW to accessing services. Through this outcome PITCH will seek to achieve increased political commitment for HIV and SRHR services that target KPs and AGYW, and to develop the capacity of PITCH country partners to hold governments to account for the implementation of policies and other political commitments at all levels. With this outcome we hope to achieve a more informed and organised movement of community-led CSOs (KPs and AGYW) working together and engaging decision/opinion/policy makers, health care providers, religious leaders etc towards improving HIV and SRHR services (including implementation – funding, decriminalization, promoting harm reduction) for KPs and AGYW.
IndL1.1: (LGBT) Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting LGBT
IndL1.1: (PWUD) Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL1.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
GB-CHC-1038860-P-8801-270-NG
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Nigeria Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. The project is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of their “Dialogue and Dissent” programme. In Nigeria, the main focus will be towards promoting harm reduction within the law enforcement sector, addressing SRHR and health needs of LGBT, sex workers and AGYW, enhancing the capacity of partners on leadership and organisational capacity building based on needs so as to be better advocates; this will also be through promoting partnerships with key advocacy champions and strengthening the use of evidence for advocacy.
Country-specific long-term outcomes include: 1) Key Populations (KPs) and adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) have equal access to friendly, age-appropriate SRH, HIV and MNCH services, and harm reduction commodities. 2) Enabling legal and policy frameworks are in place and implemented through a human rights approach (LGBT) , a public health approach (PWID), and focus on domestic and international resources (AGYW).
In Nigeria, the Frontline AIDS' target groups are: people who inject drugs, adolescent girls and young women and LGBTI people.
Aids Fonds - STOP AIDS NOW!
Frontline AIDS
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
+44(0)1273718900
mail@frontlineaids.org
http://www.frontlineaids.org
17011
304556
220000
220000
175000
4500.55
16766.32
55195421
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Education As A Vaccine Against AIDS (EVA)
321584
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
EVA
8288.139999999999
27.08
995.37
6008.66
10179.89
6650.14
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Education As A Vaccine Against AIDS (EVA)
31607352
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Education As A Vaccine Against AIDS (EVA)
-31230.86
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Education As A Vaccine Against AIDS (EVA)
182128.43
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Education As A Vaccine Against AIDS (EVA)
38089.83
85380
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
EVA
58472.47
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
EVA
120764.69
Frontline AIDS
EVA
13590.42
89707.61
Frontline AIDS
EVA
94177
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Education As A Vaccine Against AIDS (EVA)
26597710.5
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Education As A Vaccine Against AIDS (EVA)
1663.31
5416.61
111797.56
Frontline AIDS
EVA
250316
Frontline AIDS
EVA
15604.68
19967.65
65673.71
Frontline Aids
EVA
392.3511111
Frontline Aids
-1066
Frontline Aids
EVA
146675.05
Frontline Aids
EVA
2838.88
72489
Frontline Aids
EVA
98161.28
Frontline Aids
EVA
2491.96
S1: (Self) Stigma addressed
For this outcome Stigma refers to both the internal stigma (self-stigma) experienced and expressed by KPs and AGYW themselves, as well as
external stigma and discrimination expressed by decision makers and those with widespread influence (government, media etc) as well as communities,
religious and traditional leaders, service providers, families etc toward KPs and AGYW. This outcome focuses on achieving changes in the beliefs, attitudes
and behaviour of those who express this external stigma and discrimination, in the hope that KPs and AGYW experience less stigma and discrimination
because of their HIV status and/or gender and sexuality over the course of PITCH. Our assumption is that as levels of external stigma reduce, incidences of
self-stigma also reduce, contributing to an increase in public demand for access to HIV-related services for KPs and AGYW.
IndS1.1 (LGBT): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.1 (PWUD): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.2 (LGBT): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
IndS1.2 (PWUD): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
S4: Engagement among stakeholders intensified
This outcome is designed to track the progress of PITCH partners in increasing their level of interaction with national level CSOs; social
justice networks; local, district and national level authorities; and international organisations including AU, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and WHO. We are
looking to better understand how PITCH is having an impact on the ability of partners to confidently engage in dialogue and collaborate with a range of
stakeholders that have an influence over changes in policy and practice in relations to meeting the needs of KPS and AGYW. Changes in the levels of
interaction are measured through the number of meetings etc between implementing partners and the stakeholders referred to here where advocacy is
carried out. Through this outcome we also seek to understand changes in the level of capacity and confidence to advocate with country, regional and
global level advocacy targets, and the impact this has on changes in levels of engagement between PITCH partners and these same stakeholders.
IndS4.1 (LGBT): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.1 (PWUD): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
M2: Advocacy targets engaged
This outcome focuses on the experiences of PITCH partners when engaging advocacy targets that can influence decision-making processes. These advocacy targets will be global, regional, national, or local government representatives and politicians, as well as religious and traditional leaders and the police etc. We are looking for evidence of these advocacy targets listening to local and national civil society, including youth and KP-led organisations. We are also looking for evidence of these advocacy targets amending or introducing new policies and encouraging practice and behaviour that responds to the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. Moreover, we are looking to draw connections between the increased capacity of PITCH partners and the effective engagement of these advocacy targets.
IndM2.1 (LGBT): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
IndM2.1 (PWUD): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
IndM2.2 (LGBT): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.2 (PWUD): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.3 (LGBT): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
IndM2.3 (PWUD): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
M3: Demand for services and rights increased
This outcome relates to PITCH partners, through their advocacy work, having a measurable, positive impact on the ability of KPs and AGYW to enjoy the same human rights (with specific reference to equality of access to HIV-related services as well as access to broader SRHR rights) as others in their community and wider society. With this outcome we hope that PITCH advocacy will contribute to changes in government policy and practice that will enable communities and civil society to express themselves, be more active and access resources. We also want to achieve a change in the way that governments see themselves, and to reach a point where governments recognise their roles as primary duty bearers, and are willing to be held accountable by people living with HIV, marginalised people and wider civil society groups.
IndM3.1 (LGBT): Number of rights violation cases against KPs and AGYW brought to court
IndM3.2 (LGBT): Number of detentions/arrests of key populations (LGBT, PWUD, sex workers)
IndM3.2 (PWUD): Number of detentions/arrests of key populations (LGBT, PWUD, sex workers)
L1: With critical mass of support, civil society holds governments to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services
This outcome is concerned with achieving a long-term increase in the influence of civil society over government policy and funding of the national HIV response and, fundamentally, a reduction in barriers faced by Key Populations and AGYW to accessing services. Through this outcome PITCH will seek to achieve increased political commitment for HIV and SRHR services that target KPs and AGYW, and to develop the capacity of PITCH country partners to hold governments to account for the implementation of policies and other political commitments at all levels. With this outcome we hope to achieve a more informed and organised movement of community-led CSOs (KPs and AGYW) working together and engaging decision/opinion/policy makers, health care providers, religious leaders etc towards improving HIV and SRHR services (including implementation – funding, decriminalization, promoting harm reduction) for KPs and AGYW.
IndL1.1 (LGBT): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.1 (PWUD): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL1.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL2.1 (PWUD): # of Policies formally proposed/accepted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies etc)
IndL2.2 (PWUD): # of Policies formally blocked/retracted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies)
IndL2.3 (LGBT): # of policies/ laws/strategies currently being implemented to meet the needs of KPs and AGYW as a result of programme contribution
IndL2.3 (PWUD): # of policies/ laws/strategies currently being implemented to meet the needs of KPs and AGYW as a result of programme contribution
S2: Advocacy agenda set
This outcome focuses on demonstrating the changing capacities of PITCH partners to influence the advocacy agenda in their countries in
relation to the specific advocacy asks and rights of KPs and AGYW. The ability to influence and ‘set’ advocacy agendas is based on the ability to develop
evidence-based, strategic and targeted advocacy plans and activities that include clear recommendations for decision makers and other advocacy
targets.
IndS2.1 (LGBT): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.1 (PWUD): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
IndS2.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
S3: Enhanced capacity to capture evidence
This outcome focuses on demonstrating increased capacity among PITCH partners to collect and use evidence (e.g. through reviews of reports
and other public documents, research using interviews and surveys, capturing data through monitoring activities etc) to inform their advocacy. It is
important that the focus of partners’ reporting is on explaining in what ways their capacity to document evidence has improved, and what they have done
with this evidence. This should be described and analysed by partners from the perspective of planning and implementing their advocacy. Where partners
feel that their evidence-based advocacy has contributed toward a change in policy, when reporting against the indicators below, please provide evidence
that illustrates how your advocacy contributed to this policy change.
IndS3.1 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.1 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.2 (LGBT): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
IndS3.2 (PWUD): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
M1: Inclusive coalitions organised
This outcome is focused on helping PITCH country partners to contribute toward the strengthening of coalitions that they are members of, by making these coalitions more inclusive of CSOs and others who advocate on behalf of KPs and AGYW. Where relevant coalitions do not already exist, PITCH helps partners to develop the skills they need in order to establish and facilitate coalitions that function effectively, have clear advocacy strategies in place, and that are genuinely inclusive. Inclusivity is measured both in terms of the coalitions’ membership as well as their ability to articulate the needs, rights and concerns of KPs and AGYW. We are measuring progress in line with this focus. We hope that by helping coalitions to become increasingly strategic, effective and inclusive that we will see evidence of increased collaboration among PITCH partners and coalition members as well as the enhanced coordination of advocacy activities with aligned messaging.
IndM1.1 (LGBT): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.1 (PWUD): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (LGBT): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (PWUD): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
GB-CHC-1038860-P-8801-270-UG
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Uganda Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. In Uganda, key advocacy and lobby interventions will include sensitisation campaigns on the health and rights of KPs and AGYW, lobbying for policy change, and building support for an improved, and uptake of, integrated quality healthcare services.
Country-specific long-term outcomes include: 1) Friendly, quality, comprehensive, integrated HIV, SRHR and harm reduction services are available, accessible and acceptable in public, private and NGO facilities countrywide. 2) Community structures promote and protect SRHR for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) and effectively eliminate gender based violence, sexual exploitation/abuse and harmful cultural practises (including early marriage and FGM). 3) Key Populations and AGYW actively participate in local and national civil and political spaces to influence law and policy development for the promotion and protection of their health and rights. 4) Enabling laws, policies and protocols are in place and implemented to support full realisation of SRHR and decriminalisation for KPs and AGYW.
In Uganda, the Frontline AIDS' target groups are: LGBTI people, people who use drugs and adolescent girls and young women.
Public Health Ambassadors Uganda (PHAU)
Uganda Youth Coaliti on on Adolescent SRHR and HIV (CYSRA)
Icebreakers Uganda (IB U)
Aids Fonds - STOP AIDS NOW! - Soa Aids Nederland
Frontline AIDS
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
Health Global Access Project Inc. (HealthGAP)
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
+44(0)1273718900
mail@frontlineaids.org
https://frontlineaids.org/
349574
350000
400000
400000
350000
50615.97
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
17511.52
80707726
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
CHAU
150324098
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
CYSRA
450915289
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
HRAPF
68997137
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
PHAU
88675289
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
TEU
142301504
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
UHRN
18481359
Frontline AIDS
TEU
8138.98
35912.2
66634009.24
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
CHAU
270697050
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
HRAPF
109202072
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
SMUG
-9756147
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
SMUG
-6363423
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN26
-126265510
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
UHRN
79481469.86
Frontline AIDS
CHAU
26585000
Frontline AIDS
CYSRA
105503368
Frontline AIDS
HRAPF
5045250
Frontline AIDS
PHAU
10500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
REPSSI
97529609.59999999
Frontline AIDS
SMUG
15871310
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN26
47890457
Frontline AIDS
UHRN
69861590
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF)
17277777
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Youth Coalition on Adolescent SRHR and HIV (CYSRA Uganda)
17277777
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Youth Coalition on Adolescent SRHR and HIV (CYSRA Uganda)
94349119
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
53999640
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Icebreakers Uganda
19351198
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
42561489
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Public Health Ambassadors Uganda (PHAU)
26532185
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Public Health Ambassadors Uganda (PHAU)
30204458
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
182852203
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
24591796
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF)
67127974
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
206682372
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
22290133
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
96967822
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
28218125
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
6.38
22.78
2293.25
3001.14
6217.67
2.13
1307.65
12849.3
32645000
Frontline AIDS
CYSRA
61021223
Frontline AIDS
HRAPF
42926738
Frontline AIDS
PHAU
4759
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN21
7603956
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN39
113784162
Frontline AIDS
SMUG
25233700
Frontline AIDS
TEU
19277160
Frontline AIDS
UHRN
34053.33
2772.32
3058.2
30219850
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
26526392
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Public Health Ambassadors Uganda (PHAU)
104999702
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF)
18781698
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Youth Coalition on Adolescent SRHR and HIV (CYSRA Uganda)
16605000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Youth Coalition on Adolescent SRHR and HIV (CYSRA Uganda)
125478580
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF)
11104500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Icebreakers Uganda
89408541
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
33489444
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Harm Reduction Network (UHRN)
233664875
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Harm Reduction Network (UHRN)
57205214
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Youth Coalition on Adolescent SRHR and HIV (CYSRA Uganda)
173510157
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF)
3054000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Icebreakers Uganda
161842810
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
23155000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Youth Coalition on Adolescent SRHR and HIV (CYSRA Uganda)
19608149
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Harm Reduction Network (UHRN)
139936928.6
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF)
129357349
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
-823389218
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
-525856083
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
31416.45
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
103503
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
34542750
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Youth Coalition on Adolescent SRHR and HIV (CYSRA)
34542798
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Public Health Ambassadors Uganda (PHAU)
26850863
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF)
30736400
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Icebreakers Uganda
17271399
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Public Health Ambassadors Uganda (PHAU)
35624447
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
54790543
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
79218.2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
5863.32
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
7835.76
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
26740761
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Harm Reduction Network (UHRN)
73023.59
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
18126
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
26740761
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Harm Reduction Network (UHRN)
861141279
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
1303726882
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
9037400
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
17271399
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Public Health Ambassadors Uganda (PHAU)
26850863
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF)
54790543
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
45999308
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
53481522
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Harm Reduction Network (UHRN)
53701726
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF)
22290133
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
26737407
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Harm Reduction Network (UHRN)
17273154
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Public Health Ambassadors Uganda (PHAU)
17637516
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Icebreakers Uganda
148236650
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF)
33584000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Harm Reduction Network (UHRN)
38015171.2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
69860028
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF)
24124776
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Icebreakers Uganda
17271984
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Public Health Ambassadors Uganda (PHAU)
22109180
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
26737407
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Uganda Harm Reduction Network (UHRN)
96967822
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
21469475
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
TEU
5630.87
1422469485
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN39
30781626
Frontline AIDS
CHAU
26875000
Frontline AIDS
CYSRA
154491370
Frontline AIDS
HRAPF
18466250
Frontline AIDS
PHAU
91154841.06
Frontline AIDS
SMUG
40721426
Frontline AIDS
TEU
25382049
Frontline AIDS
UHRN
10522.04
147090192.1
Frontline AIDS
SMUG
198482313
Frontline AIDS
HRAPF
46795000
Frontline AIDS
CYSRA
6247.14
22882057
Frontline AIDS
TEU
59963837
Frontline AIDS
UHRN
19743750
Frontline AIDS
PHAU
764937046
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN39
10656.57
Frontline Aids
346197509
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN39
778609675
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN39
8369.546667
459568899
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN39
608146683
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN39
11951.29
277155344
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
22109180
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
109581086
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
44580267
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
S1: (Self) Stigma addressed
For this outcome Stigma refers to both the internal stigma (self-stigma) experienced and expressed by KPs and AGYW themselves, as well as
external stigma and discrimination expressed by decision makers and those with widespread influence (government, media etc) as well as communities,
religious and traditional leaders, service providers, families etc toward KPs and AGYW. This outcome focuses on achieving changes in the beliefs, attitudes
and behaviour of those who express this external stigma and discrimination, in the hope that KPs and AGYW experience less stigma and discrimination
because of their HIV status and/or gender and sexuality over the course of PITCH. Our assumption is that as levels of external stigma reduce, incidences of
self-stigma also reduce, contributing to an increase in public demand for access to HIV-related services for KPs and AGYW.
IndS1.1 (LGBT): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.1 (PWUD): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.2 (LGBT): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
IndS1.2 (PWUD): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
S4: Engagement among stakeholders intensified
This outcome is designed to track the progress of PITCH partners in increasing their level of interaction with national level CSOs; social
justice networks; local, district and national level authorities; and international organisations including AU, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and WHO. We are
looking to better understand how PITCH is having an impact on the ability of partners to confidently engage in dialogue and collaborate with a range of
stakeholders that have an influence over changes in policy and practice in relations to meeting the needs of KPS and AGYW. Changes in the levels of
interaction are measured through the number of meetings etc between implementing partners and the stakeholders referred to here where advocacy is
carried out. Through this outcome we also seek to understand changes in the level of capacity and confidence to advocate with country, regional and
global level advocacy targets, and the impact this has on changes in levels of engagement between PITCH partners and these same stakeholders.
IndS4.1 (LGBT): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.1 (PWUD): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
M2: Advocacy targets engaged
This outcome focuses on the experiences of PITCH partners when engaging advocacy targets that can influence decision-making processes. These advocacy targets will be global, regional, national, or local government representatives and politicians, as well as religious and traditional leaders and the police etc. We are looking for evidence of these advocacy targets listening to local and national civil society, including youth and KP-led organisations. We are also looking for evidence of these advocacy targets amending or introducing new policies and encouraging practice and behaviour that responds to the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. Moreover, we are looking to draw connections between the increased capacity of PITCH partners and the effective engagement of these advocacy targets.
IndM2.1 (LGBT): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
IndM2.1 (PWUD): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
IndM2.2 (LGBT): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.2 (PWUD): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.3 (LGBT): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
IndM2.3 (PWUD): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
S3: Enhanced capacity to capture evidence
This outcome focuses on demonstrating increased capacity among PITCH partners to collect and use evidence (e.g. through reviews of reports
and other public documents, research using interviews and surveys, capturing data through monitoring activities etc) to inform their advocacy. It is
important that the focus of partners’ reporting is on explaining in what ways their capacity to document evidence has improved, and what they have done
with this evidence. This should be described and analysed by partners from the perspective of planning and implementing their advocacy. Where partners
feel that their evidence-based advocacy has contributed toward a change in policy, when reporting against the indicators below, please provide evidence
that illustrates how your advocacy contributed to this policy change.
IndS3.1 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.1 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.2 (LGBT): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
IndS3.2 (PWUD): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
M3: Demand for services and rights increased
This outcome relates to PITCH partners, through their advocacy work, having a measurable, positive impact on the ability of KPs and AGYW to enjoy the same human rights (with specific reference to equality of access to HIV-related services as well as access to broader SRHR rights) as others in their community and wider society. With this outcome we hope that PITCH advocacy will contribute to changes in government policy and practice that will enable communities and civil society to express themselves, be more active and access resources. We also want to achieve a change in the way that governments see themselves, and to reach a point where governments recognise their roles as primary duty bearers, and are willing to be held accountable by people living with HIV, marginalised people and wider civil society groups.
IndM3.1 (LGBT): Number of rights violation cases against KPs and AGYW brought to court
IndM3.1 (PWUD): Number of rights violation cases against KPs and AGYW brought to court
IndM3.2 (LGBT): Number of detentions/arrests of key populations (LGBT, PWUD, sex workers)
IndM3.2 (PWUD): Number of detentions/arrests of key populations (LGBT, PWUD, sex workers)
L1: With critical mass of support, civil society holds governments to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services
This outcome is concerned with achieving a long-term increase in the influence of civil society over government policy and funding of the national HIV response and, fundamentally, a reduction in barriers faced by Key Populations and AGYW to accessing services. Through this outcome PITCH will seek to achieve increased political commitment for HIV and SRHR services that target KPs and AGYW, and to develop the capacity of PITCH country partners to hold governments to account for the implementation of policies and other political commitments at all levels. With this outcome we hope to achieve a more informed and organised movement of community-led CSOs (KPs and AGYW) working together and engaging decision/opinion/policy makers, health care providers, religious leaders etc. towards improving HIV and SRHR services (including implementation – funding, decriminalization, promoting harm reduction) for KPs and AGYW.
IndL1.1 (LGBT): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.1 (PWUD): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL1.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL2.1 (PWUD): # of Policies formally proposed/accepted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies etc)
IndL2.3 (LGBT): # of policies/ laws/strategies currently being implemented to meet the needs of KPs and AGYW as a result of programme contribution
IndL2.3 (PWUD): # of policies/ laws/strategies currently being implemented to meet the needs of KPs and AGYW as a result of programme contribution
S2: Advocacy agenda set
This outcome focuses on demonstrating the changing capacities of PITCH partners to influence the advocacy agenda in their countries in
relation to the specific advocacy asks and rights of KPs and AGYW. The ability to influence and ‘set’ advocacy agendas is based on the ability to develop
evidence-based, strategic and targeted advocacy plans and activities that include clear recommendations for decision makers and other advocacy
targets.
IndS2.1 (LGBT): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.1 (PWUD): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
IndS2.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
M1: Inclusive coalitions organised
This outcome is focused on helping PITCH country partners to contribute toward the strengthening of coalitions that they are members of, by making these coalitions more inclusive of CSOs and others who advocate on behalf of KPs and AGYW. Where relevant coalitions do not already exist, PITCH helps partners to develop the skills they need in order to establish and facilitate coalitions that function effectively, have clear advocacy strategies in place, and that are genuinely inclusive. Inclusivity is measured both in terms of the coalitions’ membership as well as their ability to articulate the needs, rights and concerns of KPs and AGYW. We are measuring progress in line with this focus. We hope that by helping coalitions to become increasingly strategic, effective and inclusive that we will see evidence of increased collaboration among PITCH partners and coalition members as well as the enhanced coordination of advocacy activities with aligned messaging.
IndM1.1 (LGBT): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.1 (PWUD): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (LGBT): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (PWUD): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
GB-CHC-1038860-P-8801-270-UA
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Ukraine Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. The project is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of their “Dialogue and Dissent” programme. The HIV/AIDS epidemic in Ukraine centres around key populations. Key interventions include lobbying for the decriminalisation of key populations, and raising awareness on (self)stigma and human rights violations. Within PITCH, we will pay particular attention to the vulnerable position of young KPs.
Country-specific long-term outcomes include: 1) Political will supporting key populations (KPs) is expressed and realised through the implementation of a primary HIV prevention strategy, focusing on quality standardised needs-based services for KPs and awareness programmes. 2) Supportive, rights-based decriminalisation legislation is adopted and enforced through strategic litigation, leading to the decriminalisation of (young) sex workers, people who inject drugs and LGBTI people.
In Ukraine, the Frontline AIDS' target groups are: people who inject drugs and sex workers.
Aids Fonds - STOP AIDS NOW!
Frontline AIDS
Alliance for Public Health
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
+44(0)1273718900
mail@frontlineaids.org
https://frontlineaids.org/
45171
213276
225000
220000
130000
74655
Frontline Aids
Alliance for Public Health
90723.6
Frontline Aids
Alliance for Public Health
1940.63
Frontline Aids
94910
Frontline Aids
Alliance for Public Health
89637.21
Frontline Aids
Alliance for Public Health
2861.51
0
Frontline Aids
Alliance for Public Health
7756.45
171311.45
Frontline Aids
Alliance for Public Health
3120.52
268547
828.86
507499
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
50875
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN23
73339
Frontline AIDS
Alliance for Public Health
1177.76
96527.63
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
50615.97
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
91564
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
57664.27
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
APH
1044.12
4897.01
167536.6
Frontline AIDS
Alliance for Public Health
1675.02
79.79000000000001
1774.11
1307.65
33975
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
795
30023.1
Frontline AIDS
Alliance for Public Health
2146.37
16497.25
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
45366.09
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
56184.32
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
221539
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
4958.09
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
13659.24
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
16497.25
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
190041.02
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
221452
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
33907
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
1461.81
2676.98
140903.41
Frontline AIDS
Alliance for Public Health
S1: (Self) Stigma addressed
For this outcome Stigma refers to both the internal stigma (self-stigma) experienced and expressed by KPs and AGYW themselves, as well as
external stigma and discrimination expressed by decision makers and those with widespread influence (government, media etc) as well as communities,
religious and traditional leaders, service providers, families etc toward KPs and AGYW. This outcome focuses on achieving changes in the beliefs, attitudes
and behaviour of those who express this external stigma and discrimination, in the hope that KPs and AGYW experience less stigma and discrimination
because of their HIV status and/or gender and sexuality over the course of PITCH. Our assumption is that as levels of external stigma reduce, incidences of
self-stigma also reduce, contributing to an increase in public demand for access to HIV-related services for KPs and AGYW.
IndS1.1 (PWUD): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.1 (LGBT): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.2 (PWUD): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
IndS1.2 (LGBT): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
S4: Engagement among stakeholders intensified
This outcome is designed to track the progress of PITCH partners in increasing their level of interaction with national level CSOs; social
justice networks; local, district and national level authorities; and international organisations including AU, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and WHO. We are
looking to better understand how PITCH is having an impact on the ability of partners to confidently engage in dialogue and collaborate with a range of
stakeholders that have an influence over changes in policy and practice in relations to meeting the needs of KPS and AGYW. Changes in the levels of
interaction are measured through the number of meetings etc between implementing partners and the stakeholders referred to here where advocacy is
carried out. Through this outcome we also seek to understand changes in the level of capacity and confidence to advocate with country, regional and
global level advocacy targets, and the impact this has on changes in levels of engagement between PITCH partners and these same stakeholders.
IndS4.1 (PWUD): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.1 (LGBT): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
M2: Advocacy targets engaged
This outcome focuses on the experiences of PITCH partners when engaging advocacy targets that can influence decision-making processes. These advocacy targets will be global, regional, national, or local government representatives and politicians, as well as religious and traditional leaders and the police etc. We are looking for evidence of these advocacy targets listening to local and national civil society, including youth and KP-led organisations. We are also looking for evidence of these advocacy targets amending or introducing new policies and encouraging practice and behaviour that responds to the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. Moreover, we are looking to draw connections between the increased capacity of PITCH partners and the effective engagement of these advocacy targets.
IndM2.1 (PWUD): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
Representatives of the KPs are not included in the advisory bodies (coordinating committees, monitoring and evaluation committees or working groups for monitoring and program development). At best, NGO representatives are involved.There is a new development that representatives of KPs became members of the CCM.
KP NGOs participate in the formation of local and national policies and strategies in the field of HIV and SRHR, but their effectiveness is less than expected due to: 1) low level of advocacy skills; 2) bureaucracy; 3) hidden sabotage of officials.
IndM2.1 (LGBT): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
Representatives of the KPs are not included in the advisory bodies (coordinating committees, monitoring and evaluation committees or working groups for monitoring and program development). At best, NGO representatives are involved.There is a new development that representatives of KPs became members of the CCM.
KP NGOs participate in the formation of local and national policies and strategies in the field of HIV and SRHR, but their effectiveness is less than expected due to: 1) low level of advocacy skills; 2) bureaucracy; 3) hidden sabotage of officials.
IndM2.2 (PWUD): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.2 (LGBT): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.3 (PWUD): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
IndM2.3 (LGBT): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
L2: Enabling legal and policy frameworks that are adequately resourced and implemented
With this outcome we want to understand the contribution of PITCH to legislation, and the implementation of this legislation, that is supportive of the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. This might involve the introduction of new policy and legislation in support of KPs and AGYW, as well as the blocking or retraction of laws and policies that restrict or prevent KPs and AGWY from accessing the services to which they have a right. We will look for evidence of decriminalisation, and of governments implementing existing laws and policies where they exist. Examples of new laws and policies might include, in Uganda, the implementation of the Antinarcotic Act, HIV Control Act, or Public Management Act, SRHR guidelines. In terms of reversing the application of restrictive laws and policies, this might include the removal of administrative sanctions (monetary penalties), which was reported in the context of Sex Workers in Ukraine.
IndL2.1 (PWUD): # of Policies formally proposed/accepted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies
IndL2.2 (PWUD): # of Policies formally blocked/retracted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies)
IndL2.3 (PWUD): # of policies/ laws/strategies currently being implemented to meet the needs of KPs and AGYW as a result of programme contribution
M1: Inclusive coalitions organised
This outcome is focused on helping PITCH country partners to contribute toward the strengthening of coalitions that they are members of, by making these coalitions more inclusive of CSOs and others who advocate on behalf of KPs and AGYW. Where relevant coalitions do not already exist, PITCH helps partners to develop the skills they need in order to establish and facilitate coalitions that function effectively, have clear advocacy strategies in place, and that are genuinely inclusive. Inclusivity is measured both in terms of the coalitions’ membership as well as their ability to articulate the needs, rights and concerns of KPs and AGYW. We are measuring progress in line with this focus. We hope that by helping coalitions to become increasingly strategic, effective and inclusive that we will see evidence of increased collaboration among PITCH partners and coalition members as well as the enhanced coordination of advocacy activities with aligned messaging.
IndM1.1 (PWUD): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.1 (LGBT): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (PWUD): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
As there is no coalition with joint advocacy strategy it is not possible to measure the effectiveness of coalitions based on the joint advocacy strategy. The Coalition of PLWHA does not focussed on KPs issues, as mentioned earlier.
Speaking about the reasons for absence of advocacy strategy, key informants mention that there is a lack of communication, disagreement in action steps and a very high level of competition for financial resources among small NGOs. Cooperation is particularly weak in the sex workers' community.
NGOs working on PWUD and SW issues often do not have clear advocacy agenda developed.
IndM1.2 (LGBT): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
As there is no coalition with joint advocacy strategy it is not possible to measure the effectiveness of coalitions based on the joint advocacy strategy. The Coalition of PLWHA does not focussed on KPs issues, as mentioned earlier.
Speaking about the reasons for absence of advocacy strategy, key informants mention that there is a lack of communication, disagreement in action steps and a very high level of competition for financial resources among small NGOs. Cooperation is particularly weak in the sex workers' community.
NGOs working on PWUD and SW issues often do not have clear advocacy agenda developed.
S2: Advocacy agenda set
This outcome focuses on demonstrating the changing capacities of PITCH partners to influence the advocacy agenda in their countries in
relation to the specific advocacy asks and rights of KPs and AGYW. The ability to influence and ‘set’ advocacy agendas is based on the ability to develop
evidence-based, strategic and targeted advocacy plans and activities that include clear recommendations for decision makers and other advocacy
targets.
IndS2.1 (PWUD): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.1 (LGBT): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
IndS2.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
S3: Enhanced capacity to capture evidence
This outcome focuses on demonstrating increased capacity among PITCH partners to collect and use evidence (e.g. through reviews of reports
and other public documents, research using interviews and surveys, capturing data through monitoring activities etc) to inform their advocacy. It is
important that the focus of partners’ reporting is on explaining in what ways their capacity to document evidence has improved, and what they have done
with this evidence. This should be described and analysed by partners from the perspective of planning and implementing their advocacy. Where partners
feel that their evidence-based advocacy has contributed toward a change in policy, when reporting against the indicators below, please provide evidence
that illustrates how your advocacy contributed to this policy change.
IndS3.1 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.2 (PWUD): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
IndS3.2 (LGBT): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
L1: With critical mass of support, civil society holds governments to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services
This outcome is concerned with achieving a long-term increase in the influence of civil society over government policy and funding of the national HIV response and, fundamentally, a reduction in barriers faced by Key Populations and AGYW to accessing services. Through this outcome PITCH will seek to achieve increased political commitment for HIV and SRHR services that target KPs and AGYW, and to develop the capacity of PITCH country partners to hold governments to account for the implementation of policies and other political commitments at all levels. With this outcome we hope to achieve a more informed and organised movement of community-led CSOs (KPs and AGYW) working together and engaging decision/opinion/policy makers, health care providers, religious leaders etc towards improving HIV and SRHR services (including implementation – funding, decriminalization, promoting harm reduction) for KPs and AGYW.
IndL1.1 (PWUD): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting PWUD
IndL1.1 (LGBT): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting LGBT
IndL1.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL1.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
GB-CHC-1038860-P-8801-270-VN
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Vietnam Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. The project is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of their “Dialogue and Dissent” programme. In Vietnam, focus areas for lobby and advocacy are awareness raising about rights and needs, lobbying for meaningful community involvement in legislation, and policy and guidelines processes. Key in achieving this is constructive collaboration with the government at national and local level.
Country-specific long-term outcomes include: 1) Key populations (KPs) and adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) have improved access to social health insurance. 2) Meaningful involvement of sex workers and LGBTI CSOs by by the government to influence local and national HIV response. 3) Targeted services for KPs are available and accessible. 4) Key legal and policy frameworks that support KPs and AGYW are implemented, with particular focus on violence reduction.
In Vietnam, the Frontline AIDS' target group is Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people (LGBT) and people who inject drugs (PWUD).
Aids Fonds - STOP AIDS NOW!
Frontline AIDS
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
+44(0)1273718900
mail@frontlineaids.org
https://frontlineaids.org/
229909.85
200000
240000
240000
200000
3766111478
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN23
370466913
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN23
1641.8
462568005
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN23
1257902261
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN23
-13071.63
877580825.66
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN23
1311
Frontline Aids
325.39
998638009.6
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN23
2013869368
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN23
1051.715556
3285806631
Frontline Aids
Local CSO/PTN23
1025.44
1752925982.93
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
355578568
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
4882170784
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
4885453346
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
1480031854
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local / National CSO
14.07
5828500000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN23
540.02
379394009
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN23
46450.74
64
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN23
8.029999999999999
5.93
3.87
22.58
1949.74
382.87
-1929.09
1416474160
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
360.39
3191361798
Frontline AIDS
Local CSO/PTN23
1291.72
1403.97
636.26
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
125791.52
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
49500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
125944.9
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
1220278973
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
S1: (Self) Stigma addressed
For this outcome Stigma refers to both the internal stigma (self-stigma) experienced and expressed by KPs and AGYW themselves, as well as
external stigma and discrimination expressed by decision makers and those with widespread influence (government, media etc) as well as communities, religious and traditional leaders, service providers, families etc toward KPs and AGYW. This outcome focuses on achieving changes in the beliefs, attitudes and behaviour of those who express this external stigma and discrimination, in the hope that KPs and AGYW experience less stigma and discrimination because of their HIV status and/or gender and sexuality over the course of PITCH. Our assumption is that as levels of external stigma reduce, incidences of self-stigma also reduce, contributing to an increase in public demand for access to HIV-related services for KPs and AGYW.
IndS1.1 (PWUD): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.1 (LGBT): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.2 (LGBT): % of LGBT who report to have recently experienced
stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
IndS1.2 (PWUD): % of LGBT who report to have recently experienced
stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
S3: Enhanced capacity to capture evidence
This outcome focuses on demonstrating increased capacity among PITCH partners to collect and use evidence (e.g. through reviews of reports
and other public documents, research using interviews and surveys, capturing data through monitoring activities etc) to inform their advocacy. It is
important that the focus of partners’ reporting is on explaining in what ways their capacity to document evidence has improved, and what they have done
with this evidence. This should be described and analysed by partners from the perspective of planning and implementing their advocacy. Where partners
feel that their evidence-based advocacy has contributed toward a change in policy, when reporting against the indicators below, please provide evidence
that illustrates how your advocacy contributed to this policy change.
IndS3.1 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.1 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.2 (LGBT): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
IndS3.2 (PWUD): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
S4: Engagement among stakeholders intensified
This outcome is designed to track the progress of PITCH partners in increasing their level of interaction with national level CSOs; social
justice networks; local, district and national level authorities; and international organisations including AU, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and WHO. We are
looking to better understand how PITCH is having an impact on the ability of partners to confidently engage in dialogue and collaborate with a range of
stakeholders that have an influence over changes in policy and practice in relations to meeting the needs of KPS and AGYW. Changes in the levels of
interaction are measured through the number of meetings etc between implementing partners and the stakeholders referred to here where advocacy is
carried out. Through this outcome we also seek to understand changes in the level of capacity and confidence to advocate with country, regional and
global level advocacy targets, and the impact this has on changes in levels of engagement between PITCH partners and these same stakeholders.
IndS4.1 (PWUD): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
M2: Advocacy targets engaged
This outcome focuses on the experiences of PITCH partners when engaging advocacy targets that can influence decision-making processes. These advocacy targets will be global, regional, national, or local government representatives and politicians, as well as religious and traditional leaders and the police etc. We are looking for evidence of these advocacy targets listening to local and national civil society, including youth and KP-led organisations. We are also looking for evidence of these advocacy targets amending or introducing new policies and encouraging practice and behaviour that responds to the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. Moreover, we are looking to draw connections between the increased capacity of PITCH partners and the effective engagement of these advocacy targets.
IndM2.1 (LGBT): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
IndM2.1 (PWUD): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
IndM2.2 (LGBT): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.2 (PWUD): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.3 (PWUD): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
M1: Inclusive coalitions organised
This outcome is focused on helping PITCH country partners to contribute toward the strengthening of coalitions that they are members of, by making these coalitions more inclusive of CSOs and others who advocate on behalf of KPs and AGYW. Where relevant coalitions do not already exist, PITCH helps partners to develop the skills they need in order to establish and facilitate coalitions that function effectively, have clear advocacy strategies in place, and that are genuinely inclusive. Inclusivity is measured both in terms of the coalitions’ membership as well as their ability to articulate the needs, rights and concerns of KPs and AGYW. We are measuring progress in line with this focus. We hope that by helping coalitions to become increasingly strategic, effective and inclusive that we will see evidence of increased collaboration among PITCH partners and coalition members as well as the enhanced coordination of advocacy activities with aligned messaging.
IndM1.1 (LGBT): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.1 (PWUD): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (PWUD): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (LGBT): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
S2: Advocacy agenda set
This outcome focuses on demonstrating the changing capacities of PITCH partners to influence the advocacy agenda in their countries in
relation to the specific advocacy asks and rights of KPs and AGYW. The ability to influence and ‘set’ advocacy agendas is based on the ability to develop
evidence-based, strategic and targeted advocacy plans and activities that include clear recommendations for decision makers and other advocacy
targets.
IndS2.1 (PWUD): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
L1: With critical mass of support, civil society holds governments to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services
This outcome is concerned with achieving a long-term increase in the influence of civil society over government policy and funding of the national HIV response and, fundamentally, a reduction in barriers faced by Key Populations and AGYW to accessing services. Through this outcome PITCH will seek to achieve increased political commitment for HIV and SRHR services that target KPs and AGYW, and to develop the capacity of PITCH country partners to hold governments to account for the implementation of policies and other political commitments at all levels. With this outcome we hope to achieve a more informed and organised movement of community-led CSOs (KPs and AGYW) working together and engaging decision/opinion/policy makers, health care providers, religious leaders etc towards improving HIV and SRHR services (including implementation – funding, decriminalization, promoting harm reduction) for KPs and AGYW.
IndL1.1 (LGBT): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.1 (PWUD): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL1.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL2.3 (PWUD): # of policies/ laws/strategies currently being implemented to meet the needs of KPs and AGYW as a result of programme contribution
GB-CHC-1038860-P-8801-270-ZW
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Zimbabwe Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. The project is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of their “Dialogue and Dissent” programme. In Zimbabwe, key advocacy interventions include sensitisation campaigns on the rights and needs of SW, LGBT and AGYW, informed by structural evidence building on stigma, discrimination and human rights violations.
Country-specific long-term outcomes include: 1) Increased and improved targeted health, HIV and SRHR services that are friendly and accessible for all LGBTI people, sex workers (SW) and adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) 2) Improved human rights and political accountability from the government of Zimbabwe on rights-based health, HIV and SRHR services for LGBTI people, SW and AGYW. 3) Availability and implementation of key enabling laws and policies that support the rights of LGBTI, SW and AGYW with adequate budget allocation.
In Zimbabwe, Frontline AIDS' target groups are: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Intersex (LGBTI) people and people who use drugs (PWUD).
Aids Fonds - STOP AIDS NOW!
Health Global Access Project Inc. (HealthGAP)
Frontline AIDS
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
+44(0)1273718900
mail@frontlineaids.org
https://frontlineaids.org/
88330
244333
280000
274571
274571
13145.57
49954
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
FACT
125060
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
GALZ
44000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ZCLDN
3008.59
Frontline AIDS
FACT
30172
Frontline AIDS
GALZ
14597
Frontline AIDS
ZCLDN
1427.73
7342.09
76788
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN08
14993
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN28
9260.25
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN07
38620
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN08
21433
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local CSO/PTN28
10340
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous organisation
35032
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
9640
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ZCLDN
5650
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ZCLDN
3926.05
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
FACT
2322.58
728.16
4673.73
117.15
-279.96
59620
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
53.21
28304.93
Frontline AIDS
FACT
44938.64
Frontline AIDS
GALZ
29341.39
Frontline AIDS
ZCLDN
7011.01
2114.61
45697
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
4845.38
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
FACT
21651.5
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
23625.75
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
56930
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Local / National CSO
2690
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ZCLDN
36285
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
94142
Frontline AIDS
GALZ
39841
Frontline AIDS
FACT
23825
Frontline AIDS
ZCLDN
8430.49
Frontline AIDS
FACT
7700
Frontline AIDS
GALZ
20191.58
Frontline AIDS
ZCLDN
2551.13
12650
Frontline AIDS
ZCLDN
8688.02
Frontline AIDS
FACT
15822.97
Frontline AIDS
GALZ
9270
Frontline AIDS
ZCLDN
576.39
28639
Frontline AIDS
GALZ
5168.18
1353.78
Frontline AIDS
ZCLDN
12242.03
Frontline AIDS
FACT
4629.48
53969.44
Frontline Aids
ZCLDN
27924.16
Frontline Aids
FACT
15622.45
Frontline Aids
ZCLDN
38101.71
Frontline Aids
GALZ
18615
Frontline Aids
FACT
2567
Frontline Aids
4337.004444
23380
Frontline Aids
GALZ
31857
Frontline Aids
ZCLDN
25569.10
Frontline Aids
FACT
65809.20
Frontline Aids
GALZ
28746.92
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
20000
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
FACT
136477
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anonymous Organisation
S1: (Self) Stigma addressed
For this outcome Stigma refers to both the internal stigma (self-stigma) experienced and expressed by KPs and AGYW themselves, as well as
external stigma and discrimination expressed by decision makers and those with widespread influence (government, media etc) as well as communities, religious and traditional leaders, service providers, families etc toward KPs and AGYW. This outcome focuses on achieving changes in the beliefs, attitudes and behaviour of those who express this external stigma and discrimination, in the hope that KPs and AGYW experience less stigma and discrimination because of their HIV status and/or gender and sexuality over the course of PITCH. Our assumption is that as levels of external stigma reduce, incidences of self-stigma also reduce, contributing to an increase in public demand for access to HIV-related services for KPs and AGYW.
IndS1.1 (LGBT): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.1 (PWUD): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.2 (LGBT): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
IndS1.2 (PWUD): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
S4: Engagement among stakeholders intensified
This outcome is designed to track the progress of PITCH partners in increasing their level of interaction with national level CSOs; social
justice networks; local, district and national level authorities; and international organisations including AU, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and WHO. We are
looking to better understand how PITCH is having an impact on the ability of partners to confidently engage in dialogue and collaborate with a range of
stakeholders that have an influence over changes in policy and practice in relations to meeting the needs of KPS and AGYW. Changes in the levels of
interaction are measured through the number of meetings etc between implementing partners and the stakeholders referred to here where advocacy is
carried out. Through this outcome we also seek to understand changes in the level of capacity and confidence to advocate with country, regional and
global level advocacy targets, and the impact this has on changes in levels of engagement between PITCH partners and these same stakeholders.
IndS4.1 (LGBT): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.1 (PWUD): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
M2: Advocacy targets engaged
This outcome focuses on the experiences of PITCH partners when engaging advocacy targets that can influence decision-making processes. These advocacy targets will be global, regional, national, or local government representatives and politicians, as well as religious and traditional leaders and the police etc. We are looking for evidence of these advocacy targets listening to local and national civil society, including youth and KP-led organisations. We are also looking for evidence of these advocacy targets amending or introducing new policies and encouraging practice and behaviour that responds to the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. Moreover, we are looking to draw connections between the increased capacity of PITCH partners and the effective engagement of these advocacy targets.
IndM2.1 (LGBT): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
IndM2.1 (PWUD): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
IndM2.2 (LGBT): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.2 (PWUD): Number of advocacy submissions made by country partners to influence decision makers
IndM2.3 (LGBT): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
IndM2.3 (PWUD): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
M3: Demand for services and rights increased
This outcome relates to PITCH partners, through their advocacy work, having a measurable, positive impact on the ability of KPs and AGYW to enjoy the same human rights (with specific reference to equality of access to HIV-related services as well as access to broader SRHR rights) as others in their community and wider society. With this outcome we hope that PITCH advocacy will contribute to changes in government policy and practice that will enable communities and civil society to express themselves, be more active and access resources. We also want to achieve a change in the way that governments see themselves, and to reach a point where governments recognise their roles as primary duty bearers, and are willing to be held accountable by people living with HIV, marginalised people and wider civil society groups.
IndM3.1 (LGBT): Number of rights violation cases against KPs and AGYW brought to court
IndM3.2 (LGBT): Number of detentions/arrests of key populations (LGBT, PWUD, sex workers)
IndM3.2 (PWUD): Number of detentions/arrests of key populations (LGBT, PWUD, sex workers)
L1: With critical mass of support, civil society holds governments to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services
This outcome is concerned with achieving a long-term increase in the influence of civil society over government policy and funding of the national HIV response and, fundamentally, a reduction in barriers faced by Key Populations and AGYW to accessing services. Through this outcome PITCH will seek to achieve increased political commitment for HIV and SRHR services that target KPs and AGYW, and to develop the capacity of PITCH country partners to hold governments to account for the implementation of policies and other political commitments at all levels. With this outcome we hope to achieve a more informed and organised movement of community-led CSOs (KPs and AGYW) working together and engaging decision/opinion/policy makers, health care providers, religious leaders etc. towards improving HIV and SRHR services (including implementation – funding, decriminalization, promoting harm reduction) for KPs and AGYW.
IndL1.1 (LGBT): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.1 (PWUD): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
One PITCH partner has the capacity to do advocacy work and make governments accountable. The results can be seen in the form of the establishment of a KP desk in the Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Care and pledges providing more facilities, staff and messages around SRHR issues that are KP friendly. However there is no capacity to carry the watchdog role that focuses on multiple issues and requires skills and more financial resources and succinct evidence for action. There are still many gaps that still need attention and government actions hence the need for these organisations to be able to document evidence for action.
IndL1.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
The PITCH partner still needs to improve its capacity to conduct advocacy for it to be recognised fully as a player representing drug users. Further to this, the organisation needs to establish linkages between drug abuse and HIV through research and synthesizing existing evidence.
IndL2.1 (PWUD): # of Policies formally proposed/accepted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies etc)
IndL2.3 (LGBT): # of policies/ laws/strategies currently being implemented to meet the needs of KPs and AGYW as a result of programme contribution
S2: Advocacy agenda set
This outcome focuses on demonstrating the changing capacities of PITCH partners to influence the advocacy agenda in their countries in
relation to the specific advocacy asks and rights of KPs and AGYW. The ability to influence and ‘set’ advocacy agendas is based on the ability to develop
evidence-based, strategic and targeted advocacy plans and activities that include clear recommendations for decision makers and other advocacy
targets.
IndS2.1 (LGBT): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.1 (PWUD): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
IndS2.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
S3: Enhanced capacity to capture evidence
This outcome focuses on demonstrating increased capacity among PITCH partners to collect and use evidence (e.g. through reviews of reports
and other public documents, research using interviews and surveys, capturing data through monitoring activities etc) to inform their advocacy. It is
important that the focus of partners’ reporting is on explaining in what ways their capacity to document evidence has improved, and what they have done
with this evidence. This should be described and analysed by partners from the perspective of planning and implementing their advocacy. Where partners
feel that their evidence-based advocacy has contributed toward a change in policy, when reporting against the indicators below, please provide evidence
that illustrates how your advocacy contributed to this policy change.
IndS3.1 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.1 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.2 (LGBT): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
None
IndS3.2 (PWUD): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
None
M1: Inclusive coalitions organised
This outcome is focused on helping PITCH country partners to contribute toward the strengthening of coalitions that they are members of, by making these coalitions more inclusive of CSOs and others who advocate on behalf of KPs and AGYW. Where relevant coalitions do not already exist, PITCH helps partners to develop the skills they need in order to establish and facilitate coalitions that function effectively, have clear advocacy strategies in place, and that are genuinely inclusive. Inclusivity is measured both in terms of the coalitions’ membership as well as their ability to articulate the needs, rights and concerns of KPs and AGYW. We are measuring progress in line with this focus. We hope that by helping coalitions to become increasingly strategic, effective and inclusive that we will see evidence of increased collaboration among PITCH partners and coalition members as well as the enhanced coordination of advocacy activities with aligned messaging.
IndM1.1 (LGBT): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
None
IndM1.2 (LGBT): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
Scorecard: No results achieved by the coalition
IndM1.2 (PWUD): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
Scorecard: No results achieved by the coalition
GB-CHC-1038860-P-8801-270-MM
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Myanmar Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. The project is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of their “Dialogue and Dissent” programme. In Myanmar, focus areas for lobby and advocacy are awareness raising about rights and needs, scaling-up access to treatment and services, and lobbying for meaningful community involvement in legislation, policy and guidelines processes.
Country-specific long-term outcomes include: 1) Increased access to friendly and quality health, HIV and SRHR services by KPs (including young KPs) and AGYW. 2) KP networks and key advocates become part of relevant country structures and are regarded as useful and equal partners by the government in decision-making processes. 3) Enabling legal and policy frameworks promoting and protecting KPs (including young KPs) and AGYW are adequately resourced and implemented.
In Myanmar, the Frontline AIDS' target groups are: sex workers, people who inject drugs, adolescent girls and young women, and LGBTI people
Aids Fonds - STOP AIDS NOW!
Frontline AIDS
Mahamate
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
+44(0)1273718900
mail@frontlineaids.org
http://www.frontlineaids.org
131121
250000
250000
275000
130000
149404314.1
Frontline Aids
Mahamate
-287.1766667
Frontline Aids
94059800
Frontline Aids
Mahamate
104622440.8
Frontline Aids
Mahamate
4311.066667
94516689.81
Frontline Aids
Mahamate
4453
109683320.5
Frontline AIDS
Mahamate
74253866.21000001
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Myanmar
556.6799999999999
574585765
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Mahamate
1103.11
46821.24
43120164
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Mahamate
15983872.63
Frontline AIDS
Mahamate
3111.82
1815.03
3514.63
6318.53
2778.78
5476.72
345758736
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Mahamate
31315580
16500
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Myanmar
49736714.05
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Mahamate
12042712.5
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Myanmar
63770523.29
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Myanmar
371819050
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Myanmar
51131152.58
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Mahamate
69646.05
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Myanmar
237168842.12
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Mahamate
1823.3
10250.71
670.63
177334832.2
Frontline AIDS
Mahamate
409495436
Frontline AIDS
Mahamate
99563327.91
Frontline AIDS
Mahamate
4957.15
9792.67
204617563.1
Frontline AIDS
Mahamate
S1: (Self) Stigma addressed
For this outcome Stigma refers to both the internal stigma (self-stigma) experienced and expressed by KPs and AGYW themselves, as well as
external stigma and discrimination expressed by decision makers and those with widespread influence (government, media etc) as well as communities,
religious and traditional leaders, service providers, families etc toward KPs and AGYW. This outcome focuses on achieving changes in the beliefs, attitudes
and behaviour of those who express this external stigma and discrimination, in the hope that KPs and AGYW experience less stigma and discrimination
because of their HIV status and/or gender and sexuality over the course of PITCH. Our assumption is that as levels of external stigma reduce, incidences of
self-stigma also reduce, contributing to an increase in public demand for access to HIV-related services for KPs and AGYW.
IndS1.1 (LGBT): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.1 (PWUD): Decision makers/ implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
S1.2 (LGBT): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
IndS1.2 (PWUD): % of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
S4: Engagement among stakeholders intensified
This outcome is designed to track the progress of PITCH partners in increasing their level of interaction with national level CSOs; social
justice networks; local, district and national level authorities; and international organisations including AU, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and WHO. We are
looking to better understand how PITCH is having an impact on the ability of partners to confidently engage in dialogue and collaborate with a range of
stakeholders that have an influence over changes in policy and practice in relations to meeting the needs of KPS and AGYW. Changes in the levels of
interaction are measured through the number of meetings etc between implementing partners and the stakeholders referred to here where advocacy is
carried out. Through this outcome we also seek to understand changes in the level of capacity and confidence to advocate with country, regional and
global level advocacy targets, and the impact this has on changes in levels of engagement between PITCH partners and these same stakeholders.
IndS4.1 (LGBT): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.1 (PWUD): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
M2: Advocacy targets engaged
This outcome focuses on the experiences of PITCH partners when engaging advocacy targets that can influence decision-making processes. These advocacy targets will be global, regional, national, or local government representatives and politicians, as well as religious and traditional leaders and the police etc. We are looking for evidence of these advocacy targets listening to local and national civil society, including youth and KP-led organisations. We are also looking for evidence of these advocacy targets amending or introducing new policies and encouraging practice and behaviour that responds to the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. Moreover, we are looking to draw connections between the increased capacity of PITCH partners and the effective engagement of these advocacy targets.
IndM2.1 (LGBT): Extent to which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndM2.1 (PWUD): Extent to which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndM2.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
IndM2.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
M3: Demand for services and rights increased
This outcome relates to PITCH partners, through their advocacy work, having a measurable, positive impact on the ability of KPs and AGYW to enjoy the same human rights (with specific reference to equality of access to HIV-related services as well as access to broader SRHR rights) as others in their community and wider society. With this outcome we hope that PITCH advocacy will contribute to changes in government policy and practice that will enable communities and civil society to express themselves, be more active and access resources. We also want to achieve a change in the way that governments see themselves, and to reach a point where governments recognise their roles as primary duty bearers, and are willing to be held accountable by people living with HIV, marginalised people and wider civil society groups.
IndM3.1 (LGBT): Number of rights violation cases against KPs and AGYW brought to court
IndM3.1 (PWUD): Number of rights violation cases against KPs and AGYW brought to court
IndM3.2 (LGBT): Number of detentions/arrests of key populations (LGBT, PWUD, sex workers)
IndM3.2 (PWUD): Number of detentions/arrests of key populations (LGBT, PWUD, sex workers)
L2: Enabling legal and policy frameworks that are adequately resourced and implemented
With this outcome we want to understand the contribution of PITCH to legislation, and the implementation of this legislation, that is supportive of the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. This might involve the introduction of new policy and legislation in support of KPs and AGYW, as well as the blocking or retraction of laws and policies that restrict or prevent KPs and AGWY from accessing the services to which they have a right. We will look for evidence of decriminalisation, and of governments implementing existing laws and policies where they exist. Examples of new laws and policies might include, in Uganda, the implementation of the Antinarcotic Act, HIV Control Act, or Public Management Act, SRHR guidelines. In terms of reversing the application of restrictive laws and policies, this might include the removal of administrative sanctions (monetary penalties), which was reported in the context of Sex Workers in Ukraine.
L2.1 (LGBT): Number of Policies formally proposed/accepted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies
L2.1 (PWUD): Number of Policies formally proposed/accepted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies
IndL2.2 (PWUD): # of Policies formally blocked/retracted (bills, bonds, ballot measures, regulations, administrative policies)
IndL2.3 (PWUD): # of policies/ laws/strategies currently being implemented to meet the needs of KPs and AGYW as a result of programme contribution
M1: Inclusive coalitions organised
This outcome is focused on helping PITCH country partners to contribute toward the strengthening of coalitions that they are members of, by making these coalitions more inclusive of CSOs and others who advocate on behalf of KPs and AGYW. Where relevant coalitions do not already exist, PITCH helps partners to develop the skills they need in order to establish and facilitate coalitions that function effectively, have clear advocacy strategies in place, and that are genuinely inclusive. Inclusivity is measured both in terms of the coalitions’ membership as well as their ability to articulate the needs, rights and concerns of KPs and AGYW. We are measuring progress in line with this focus. We hope that by helping coalitions to become increasingly strategic, effective and inclusive that we will see evidence of increased collaboration among PITCH partners and coalition members as well as the enhanced coordination of advocacy activities with aligned messaging.
IndM1.1 (LGBT): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.1 (PWUD): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (PWUD): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
S2: Advocacy agenda set
This outcome focuses on demonstrating the changing capacities of PITCH partners to influence the advocacy agenda in their countries in
relation to the specific advocacy asks and rights of KPs and AGYW. The ability to influence and ‘set’ advocacy agendas is based on the ability to develop
evidence-based, strategic and targeted advocacy plans and activities that include clear recommendations for decision makers and other advocacy
targets.
IndS2.1 (LGBT): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.1 (PWUD): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
IndS2.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
S3: Enhanced capacity to capture evidence
This outcome focuses on demonstrating increased capacity among PITCH partners to collect and use evidence (e.g. through reviews of reports
and other public documents, research using interviews and surveys, capturing data through monitoring activities etc) to inform their advocacy. It is
important that the focus of partners’ reporting is on explaining in what ways their capacity to document evidence has improved, and what they have done
with this evidence. This should be described and analysed by partners from the perspective of planning and implementing their advocacy. Where partners
feel that their evidence-based advocacy has contributed toward a change in policy, when reporting against the indicators below, please provide evidence
that illustrates how your advocacy contributed to this policy change.
IndS3.1 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.1 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.2 (LGBT): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
IndS3.2 (PWUD): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
L1: With critical mass of support, civil society holds governments to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services
This outcome is concerned with achieving a long-term increase in the influence of civil society over government policy and funding of the national HIV response and, fundamentally, a reduction in barriers faced by Key Populations and AGYW to accessing services. Through this outcome PITCH will seek to achieve increased political commitment for HIV and SRHR services that target KPs and AGYW, and to develop the capacity of PITCH country partners to hold governments to account for the implementation of policies and other political commitments at all levels. With this outcome we hope to achieve a more informed and organised movement of community-led CSOs (KPs and AGYW) working together and engaging decision/opinion/policy makers, health care providers, religious leaders etc towards improving HIV and SRHR services (including implementation – funding, decriminalization, promoting harm reduction) for KPs and AGYW.
IndL1.1 (LGBT): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.1 (PWUD): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.2 (LGBT): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL1.2 (PWUD): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
GB-CHC-1038860-28437-04
Frontline AIDS
Core funding to support the Frontline AIDS strategy: PR04 Foundations for Impact
We are a global movement igniting innovations that break through social, political and legal barriers that stand in the way of a future free from AIDS. This is one of six child projects under the Frontline AIDS core funding project. For more information on the parent project, please refer to 'Core funding to support the Frontline AIDS Strategy'. Under this area of work, we will use core funding provided to support our Strategy to support a stronger Frontline AIDS partnership that is evidence-based and accountable to communities. To achieve an impact on the epidemic, we need to ensure quality in our programmes, capacity strengthening and organisational resilience in our partner organisations, and a united and collaborative partnership.
Linking Organisations and networks
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
This activity ended early as a new strategy for the organisation was developed a year earlier than originally planned. Therefore a new activity has been set up for the new strategy.
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
mail@aidsalliance.org
http://www.aidsalliance.org
672000
9700
PR04 MENAHARA disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
MENAHARA
72207.98
PR04 Secretariat spend July-September 2017
86739.49
PT04 Secretariat spend 2018 Q2
31455.09
PT04 Alliance India disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance India
54595.76
PT04 Secretariat spend 2018 Q3
55248.99
PT04 Secretariat spend 2018 Q1
104682.58
PR04 Secretariat spend April-June 2017
80636.21000000001
PR04 Secretariat spend January-March 2017
144568.38
PT04 Secretariat spend 2017 Q4
3945.93
PR04 ANPUD disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asian Network of People who Use Drugs (ANPUD)
8539.82
PR04 APCOM disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asia Pacific Coalition on Male Sexual Health (APCOM)
10707.64
PR04 APTN disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asia-Pacific Transgender Network (APTN)
2682
PR04 SIDC disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
SIDC
8396
PR04 Y+ disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Y+
2657.98
PR04 REDLACTRANS disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
REDLACTRANS
13363.7
PR04 ANCS disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
1533.33
PR04 Alliance for Public Health disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
5022.2
PR04 South Asia Hub disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Regional Technical Support Hub South Asia
4428.32
PR04 ASWA disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ASWA
6360.54
PR04 ANCS disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
1489.42
PR04 APTN disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asia-Pacific Transgender Network (APTN)
6324.43
PR04 RedTraSex disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
RedTraSex
23299.94
PR04 Alliance for Public Health disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
25564.76
PR04 ANCS disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
5662.29
PR04 ASWA disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ASWA
1688
PR04 MENAHARA disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
MENAHARA
4921.59
PR04 REDLACTRANS disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
REDLACTRANS
4827.14
PR04 RedTraSex disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
RedTraSex
4231
PR04 SIDC disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
SIDC
6664.89
PR04 South Asia Hub disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Regional Technical Support Hub South Asia
6562.93
PR04 Via Libre disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Via Libre
2817
PR04 Y+ disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Y+
148.87
PR04 Alliance for Public Health disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
4511.05
PR04 ANPUD disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asian Network of People who Use Drugs (ANPUD)
2866.19
PR04 REDLACTRANS disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
REDLACTRANS
10421.86
PR04 South Asia Hub disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Regional Technical Support Hub South Asia
5790.19
PR04 ANPUD disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asian Network of People who Use Drugs (ANPUD)
-12025.5
PT04 India HIV/AIDS Alliance disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
6253.25
PT04 Rumah Cemara disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
1622.92
PT04 ANCS disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
13756.52
PT04 ANPUD disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asian Network of People who Use Drugs (ANPUD)
11460.18
PT04 APCOM disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asia Pacific Coalition on Male Sexual Health (APCOM)
7802.94
PT04 APTN disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asia-Pacific Transgender Network (APTN)
8416.690000000001
PT04 ASWA disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ASWA
8495
PT04 MENAHARA disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
MENAHARA
9047.23
PT04 REDLACTRANS disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
REDLACTRANS
8673.98
PT04 RedTraSex disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
RedTraSex
9509
PT04 SIDC disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
SIDC
10708.37
PT04 Via Libre disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Via Libre
5181
PT04 Y+ disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Y+
GB-CHC-1038860-28437-02
Frontline AIDS
Core funding to support the Frontline AIDS strategy: PR02 Health and Community Systems Strengthening
We are a global movement igniting innovations that break through social, political and legal barriers that stand in the way of a future free from AIDS. This is one of six child projects under the Frontline AIDS core funding project. For more information on the parent project, please refer to 'Core funding to support the Frontine AIDS Strategy'. Under this area of work, we will use core funding provided to support our Strategy to support community-based organisations to be connected and effective elements of health systems. Frontline AIDS will continue to focus on strengthening the community response, supporting organisations to strengthen their impact on HIV. It is our intention that wherever we work, strong community-based organisations will address the HIV and SRHR needs of their communities by working to build resilient and sustainable systems for health.
Linking Organisations and community-based organisations in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe, and Latin America and the Caribbean
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
This activity ended early as a new strategy for the organisation was developed a year earlier than originally planned. Therefore a new activity has been set up for the new strategy.
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
mail@aidsalliance.org
http://www.aidsalliance.org
715000
203773.88
PT02 Secretariat spend 2018 Q2
142668.81
PT02 Secretariat spend 2018 Q3
5245.28
PT02 SCDI disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
SCDI
2895
PT02 KHANA disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KHANA
10590.08
PT02 ANPUD disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ANPUD
66375.96000000001
PR02 Via Libre disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Via Libre
81435.37
PT02 Secretariat spend 2018 Q1
10000
PT02 Via Libre disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Via Libre
10000
PT02 VMM disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Vasavya Mahila Mandali (VMM)
317437.9
PT02 Secretariat spend 2017 Q4
10000
PT02 AAA disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anti-AIDS Association (AAA)
10000
PT02 ABS disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
10000
PT02 AIDS Care China disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Care China
10000
PT02 Alliance for Public Health disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
10000
PT02 ALN disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
10000
PT02 AMSED disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AMSED
10000.01
PT02 ANCS disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
10000
PT02 ANS-CI disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale Contre le SIDA en Cote d'Ivoire (ANS CI)
10000
PT02 Atlacatl disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Atlacatl
10000
PT02 Colectivo Sol disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Colectivo Sol
10000
PT02 IDH disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Instituto para el Desarrollo Humano (IDH)
10000
PT02 IPC disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Initiative Privée et Communautaire de lutte contre le VIH/SIDA (IPC)
10000
PT02 KANCO disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO)
10000
PT02 KHANA disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KHANA
10000
PT02 Kimirina disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Kimirina
10000
PT02 LEPRA disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
LEPRA Society
10000
PT02 MAMTA disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
MAMTA
10000
PT02 NACOSA disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
NACOSA
10000
PT02 OSSHD disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD)
10000
PT02 Positive Vibes disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Positive Vibes
10000
PT02 POZ disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Promoteurs Objectif Zerosida (POZ)
10000
PT02 Tacosode disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
TACOSODE
-962.94
PT02 APTN disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asia-Pacific Transgender Network (APTN)
18724.04
PR02 Via Libre disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Via Libre
19694.7
PR02 ANCS disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
-200.74
PR02 Alliance For Public Health disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
8273
PR02 AAA disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anti-AIDS Association (AAA)
10000
PR02 ABS disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
10000
PR02 ACS/AMO Congo disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ACS/AMO Congo
10000
PR02 AIDS Care China disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Care China
61393.94
PR02 Alliance for Public Health disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
10000
PR02 ANCS disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
10000
PR02 ANS-CI disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale Contre le SIDA en Cote d'Ivoire (ANS CI)
10000
PR02 BONELA disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Botswana Network on Ethics, Law and HIV/AIDS (BONELA)
10000
PR02 Colectivo Sol disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Colectivo Sol
7489.39
PR02 IDH disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Instituto para el Desarrollo Humano (IDH)
10000
PR02 KANCO disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO)
10000
PR02 KHANA disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KHANA
10000
PR02 Kimirina disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Corporación Kimirina
10000
PR02 LEPRA disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
LEPRA Society
10000
PR02 NACOSA disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
NACOSA
10000
PR02 Positive Vibes disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Positive Vibes
10000
PR02 POZ disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Promoteurs Objectif Zerosida (POZ)
33140.6
PR02 Alliance For Public Health disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
3941.61
PR02 ALN disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
19391.02
PR02 ANCS disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
10000
PR02 CANGO disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Co-ordinating Assembly of Non-Governmental Organisations (CANGO)
10000
PR02 Rumah Cemara disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
-1481.4
PR02 Alliance Myanmar disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
10000
PR02 AMSED disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Association Marocaine de Solidarité et Développement (AMSED)
10000
PR02 Atlacatl disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asociacion Atlacatl Vivo Positivo
10000
PR02 CHAU disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
10000
PR02 IPC disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Initiative Privée et Communautaire de lutte contre le VIH/SIDA (IPC)
10000
PR02 MAC disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Malaysian AIDS Council (MAC)
10000
PR02 OSSHD disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD)
10000
PR02 SCDI disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Centre for Supporting Community Development Initiatives (SCDI)
10000
PR02 Alliance India disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
10000
PR02 Humsafar Trust disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Humsafar Trust (HST)
-8097.88
PR02 Alliance Myanmar disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
3907.57
PT02 ANS-CI disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ANS-CI
10000
PT02 CANGO disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
CANGO
10000
PT02 BONELA disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
BONELA
19831.31
PT02 SCDI disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
SCDI
7035
PT02 KHANA disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KHANA
10000
PT02 Alliance India disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance India
10000
PT02 Humsafar Trust disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Humsafar Trust
10477.68
PT02 Rumah Cemara disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
5416.08
PT02 ANPUD disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ANPUD
17750
PT02 MENAHARA disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
MENAHARA
1000
PT02 SIDC disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
SIDC
7579.45
PT02 RedTraSex disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
RedTraSex
3227.57
PT02 ASWA disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ASWA
1608.72
PT02 MAHAMATE disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
MAHAMATE
3175.35
PT02 OSSHD disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
OSSHD
2508.57
PT02 AMSED disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AMSED
-42825.47
PT02 India HIV/AIDS Alliance disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
4089.96
PT02 Rumah Cemara disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
11595.36
PT02 APTN disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
APTN
10500
PT02 SIDC disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
SIDC
3933.74
PT02 RedTraSex disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
RedTraSex
54924.3
PT02 MAHAMATE disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
MAHAMATE
3939
PT02 FACT disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
FACT
-5259.39
PT02 ABS disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
15647.62
PT02 AIDS Care China disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Care China
-10000
PT02 Alliance for Public Health disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
7940.34
PT02 Alliance India disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
29923.61
PT02 Alliance Myanmar disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
2350
PT02 ALN disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
26005.19
PT02 ANCS disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
2000
PT02 Atlacatl disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asociacion Atlacatl Vivo Positivo
-10000
PT02 Humsafar Trust disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Humsafar Trust (HST)
-7489.39
PT02 IDH disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Instituto para el Desarrollo Humano (IDH)
12145.07
PT02 IPC disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Initiative Privée et Communautaire de lutte contre le VIH/SIDA (IPC)
-10000
PT02 KANCO disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO)
7115.47
PT02 KHANA disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KHANA
6000
PT02 Kimirina disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Corporación Kimirina
21375.11
PT02 MAMTA disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
MAMTA
2839.82
PT02 OSSHD disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD)
20066.6
PT02 Positive Vibes disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Positive Vibes
-9999.799999999999
PT02 SCDI disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Centre for Supporting Community Development Initiatives (SCDI)
139715.28
PR02 Secretariat spend January-March 2017
10000
PR02 Tacosode disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
TACOSODE
10000
PR02 Via Libre disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Via Libre
10000
PR02 VMM disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Vasavya Mahila Mandali (VMM)
2549.3
PR02 ABS disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
120730.16
PR02 Secretariat spend April-June 2017
-3076.25
PR02 Alliance Myanmar disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
5981.6
PR02 Positive Vibes disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Positive Vibes
10000
PR02 ALN disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
10000
PR02 MAMTA disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
MAMTA
2710.09
PR02 ABS disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
147682.69
PR02 Secretariat spend July-September 2017
5975.24
PR02 ANS-CI disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale Contre le SIDA en Cote d'Ivoire (ANS CI)
GB-CHC-1038860-28437-01
Frontline AIDS
Core funding to support Frontline AIDS' strategy: PR01 Healthy people
We are a global movement igniting innovations that break through social, political and legal barriers that stand in the way of a future free from AIDS. This is one of six child projects under the Frontline AIDS core funding project. For more information on the parent project, please refer to 'Core funding to support the Frontline AIDS Strategy'. Under this area of work, we will use core funding provided to support our Strategy to increase access to quality HIV and health programmes. We will do this by focusing on the people most in need using an HIV continuum of care framework, increasing capacity to manage co-infections and co-morbidities, and taking a rights-based approach.
Children, adolescents, adults, key populations, women, and men in Africa, Asia and Easter Europe, and Latin America and the Caribbean.
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
The Frontline AIDS strategy period ended a year early as it was felt a new strategy was needed sooner than originally planned.
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
mail@aidsalliance.org
http://www.aidsalliance.org
1526000
-132.54
PT01 COYAA disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
COYAA
213148.94
PT01 Secretariat spend 2018 Q4
16336
PT01 ABS disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ABS
7437.49
PT01 CHAU disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
CHAU
19129.5
PT01 India HIV/AIDS Alliance disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
6995.55
PT01 Rumah Cemara disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
11964.63
PT01 KANCO disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
3071.9
PT01 Mahamate disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Mahamate
151467.67
PT01 Secretariat spend 2018 Q2
2398.96
PR01 NYIMBWA disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
NYIMBWA
114636.6
PR01 Secretariat spend July-September 2017
7732.81
PR01 COYAA disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
COYAA
0
PT01 NIFAED disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
NIFAED
-46.74
PT01 Alliance for Public Health disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
291.74
PT01 APH disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
APH
15023.62
PT01 ANCS disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ANCS
43758.27
PT01 OSSHD disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
OSSHD
0
PT01 Alliance Myanmar disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Myanmar
0
PT01 PEERU disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
PEERU
45136.89
PT01 AIDS Care China disbursement 2018 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Care China
104445.15
PR01 Secretariat spend January-March 2017
144727.96
PR01 Secretariat spend April-June 2017
12024.69
PR01 ABS disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
15171.06
PR01 ANCS disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
33772.07
PT01 OSSHD disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
OSSHD
42686.41
PT01 Rumah Cemara disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
215285.86
PT01 Secretariat spend 2018 Q3
35671.25
PT01 CHAU disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
CHAU
179.39
PT01 COYAA disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
COYAA
26643.33
PT01 OSSHD disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
OSSHD
10318.67
PT01 ABS disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
22842.74
PT01 AIDS Care China disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
11414.23
PT01 Alliance India disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
1320.06
PT01 ANCS disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
3633.78
PT01 COYAA disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
COYAA
7310.67
PT01 OSSHD disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD)
3303.6
PT01 Rumah Cemara disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
886.94
PT01 Mahamate disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Mahamate
-12221.24
PR01 ABS disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
31211.46
PR01 AIDS Care China disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Care China
25748.73
PR01 OSSHD disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD)
33807.82
PR01 Alliance India disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
-36223.37
PR01 CHAU disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
10244.72
PR01 Rumah Cemara disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
6002.81
PR01 KANCO disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO)
6312.55
PR01 MAC disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Malaysian AIDS Council (MAC)
19183.76
PR01 ANCS disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
4068.39
PR01 PEERU disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
PEERU
35664.32
PR01 Alliance Myanmar disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
4622.44
PR01 NIFAED disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
NIFAED
21399.92
PR01 RNJ+ disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
RNJ+
31774.45
PR01 Alliance India disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
6890.17
PR01 ANCS disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
30673.59
PR01 CHAU disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
24958.93
PR01 OSSHD disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD)
84604.05
PR01 ABS disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
55651.6
PR01 AIDS Care China disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Care China
35206.24
PR01 Alliance Myanmar disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
57745
PR01 CHAU disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
68074.67999999999
PR01 KANCO disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO)
19823.91
PR01 MAC disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Malaysian AIDS Council (MAC)
-5315.62
PR01 Rumah Cemara disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
44326.48
PR01 Alliance Myanmar disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
12233.88
PR01 KANCO disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO)
61784.02
PR01 Rumah Cemara disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
37847.56
PR01 Alliance India disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
30225.3
PR01 OSSHD disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD)
21190.49
PT01 CHAU disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
CHAU
38865.9
PT01 AIDS Care China disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Care China
62004.35
PT01 Alliance India disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance India
62164.13
PT01 KANCO disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
36905.14
PT01 Mahamate disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Mahamate
10515.54
PT01 PEERU disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
PEERU
8986.20
PT01 ANCS disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ANCS
311495.55
PT01 Secretariat spend 2017 Q4
113894.38
PT01 Secretariat spend 2018 Q1
6871.31
PT01 Mahamate disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Mahamate
23793.66
PT01 ANCS disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ANCS
46.74
PT01 Alliance for Public Health disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
73280.15
PT01 ABS disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ABS
-886.94
PT01 Alliance Myanmar disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Myanmar
17959.01
PT01 ABS disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
46799.82
PT01 AIDS Care China disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Care China
50277.68
PT01 Alliance India disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
30083.65
PT01 Alliance Myanmar disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
894.8200000000001
PT01 ANCS disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
7848.52
PT01 CHAU disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
4961.71
PT01 COYAA disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
COYAA
24879.06
PT01 KANCO disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO)
-1198.49
PT01 MAC disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Malaysian AIDS Council (MAC)
7139.88
PT01 NIFAED disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
NIFAED
38365.03
PT01 OSSHD disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD)
4070.55
PT01 PEERU disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
PEERU
18777.81
PT01 RNJ+ disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
RNJ+
12413.25
PT01 Rumah Cemara disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
43211.98
PT01 AIDS Care China disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Care China
30108.67
PT01 India HIV/AIDS Alliance disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
5529.35
PT01 Rumah Cemara disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
-4746.1
PT01 KANCO disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KANCO
6863.96
PT01 NIFAED disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
NIFAED
4619.26
PT01 COYAA disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
COYAA
17426.43
PT01 Alliance for Public Health disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
14001.77
PT01 ABS disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ABS
GB-CHC-1038860-28437-03
Frontline AIDS
Core funding to support the Frontline AIDS strategy: PR03 Inclusive Societies
We are a global movement igniting innovations that break through social, political and legal barriers that stand in the way of a future free from AIDS. This is one of six child projects under the Frontline AIDS core funding project. For more information on the parent project, please refer to 'Core funding to support the Frontline AIDS Strategy'. Under this area of work, we will use core funding provided to support our Strategy to advocate for HIV, health, gender and human rights. Frontline AIDS will continue to address harmful social norms including stigma, discrimination and social attitudes. We will advocate for structural and policy changes that will improve access to and availability, affordability and quality of health services, and that promote gender equity and human rights. We will focus on driving change at all levels and building broader coalitions. We will expand our services in countries with some of the most hostile and challenging policy environments.
Adolescents, women, Key Populations, Linking Organisations
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
The Frontline AIDS strategy period ended a year early as it was felt a new strategy was needed sooner than originally planned.
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
mail@aidsalliance.org
http://www.aidsalliance.org
465000
199604.6
PR03 Secretariat spend January-March 2017
243811.05
PR03 Secretariat spend July-September 2017
226479.5
PR03 Secretariat spend April-June 2017
525599.39
PT03 Secretariat spend 2017 Q4
451341.65
PT03 Secretariat spend 2018 Q2
172064.11
PT03 Secretariat spend 2018 Q1
301531.13
PT03 Secretariat spend 2018 Q3
8077.92
PR03 ANCS disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
4153.32
PR03 ANCS disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
9188.309999999999
PT03 Alliance For Public Health disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance For Public Health
415
PT03 KHANA disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KHANA
5950
PT03 RedTraSex disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
RedTraSex
3549
PT03 NACOSA disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
NACOSA
GB-CHC-1038860-28437-05
Frontline AIDS
Core funding to support the Frontline AIDS strategy: PR05 Income
We are a global movement igniting innovations that break through social, political and legal barriers that stand in the way of a future free from AIDS. This is one of six child projects under the Frontline AIDS core funding project. For more information on the parent project, please refer to 'Core funding to support the Frontline AIDS Strategy'. Under this area of work, we will use core funding provided to support our Strategy to maintain and raise funds from governments, trusts and foundations, and new income streams.
The Frontline AIDS Secretariat will cover its operational costs, raise funds to accelerate key areas of the Strategy in order to meet targets by 2020, and diversify its funding base.
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
This activity ended early as a new strategy for the organisation was developed a year earlier than originally planned. Therefore a new activity has been set up for the new strategy.
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
mail@aidsalliance.org
http://www.aidsalliance.org
766000
254620.34
PR05 Secretariat spend July-September 2017
400922.87
PR05 Secretariat spend April-June 2017
659618.9
PT05 Secretariat spend 2017 Q4
300453.87
PR05 Secretariat spend January-March 2017
564754.13
PT05 Secretariat spend 2018 Q2
436147.25
PT05 Secretariat spend 2018 Q3
594.54
PT05 Alliance USA disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA
2144.47
PT05 Rumah Cemara disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
51283.84
PR05 Alliance India disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
2176.06
PR05 Rumah Cemara disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
7390.21
PR05 USA disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA
35198.38
PR05 Alliance India disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
13237.65
PR05 Rumah Cemara disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
5030.01
PR05 USA disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA
59762.66
PR05 Alliance India disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
10899.52
PR05 USA disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA
3955.21
PR05 MAF disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Malaysian AIDS Foundation (MAF)
-6749.43
PR05 Rumah Cemara disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
36338.47
PT05 Alliance India disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance India
312.5
PT05 International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA
27712.77
PT05 India HIV/AIDS Alliance disbursement 2018 Q3
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
93749.89999999999
PT05 Alliance India disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
3228.67
PT05 Rumah Cemara disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
7377.36
PT05 USA disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA
22156.03
PT05 Alliance India disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
192006.94
PT05 Secretariat spend 2018 Q1
GB-CHC-1038860-28437-06
Frontline AIDS
Core funding to support the Frontline AIDS strategy: PR06 Operations
We are a global movement igniting innovations that break through social, political and legal barriers that stand in the way of a future free from AIDS. This is one of six child projects under the Frontline AIDS core funding project. For more information on the parent project, please refer to 'Core funding to support the Frontline AIDS strategy'. Under this area of work, we will use core funding provided to support our Strategy to support Business Processes, Human Resources, Finance, Legal Risk and Compliance, Security, and Linking Organisation Crisis Fund.
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
This activity ended early as a new strategy for the organisation was developed a year earlier than originally planned. Therefore a new activity has been set up for the new strategy.
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
mail@aidsalliance.org
http://www.aidsalliance.org
2057000
353441.73
PR06 Secretariat spend July-September 2017
1276161.65
PT06 Secretariat spend 2018 Q2
535065.99
PR06 Secretariat spend January-March 2017
290589.17
PR06 Secretariat spend April-June 2017
-8757.209999999999
PR06 Alliance Myanmar disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
721409.75
PT06 Secretariat spend 2018 Q3
481583.21
PT06 Secretariat spend 2018 Q1
913401.24
PT06 Secretariat spend 2017 Q4
-2859.94
PT06 Alliance Myanmar disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
4932.36
PT06 Alliance USA disbursement 2018 Q1
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA
387.15
PR06 Alliance Myanmar disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
60303.78
PR06 CHAU disbursement July-September 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
32249.89
PR06 Positive Vibes disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Positive Vibes
4788.9
PR06 ALN disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
55637.42
PR06 CHAU disbursement April-June 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
-17711.91
PR06 Alliance Myanmar disbursement January-March 2017
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
10463.17
PT06 International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA disbursement 2018 Q2
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA
15030.32
PT06 CHAU disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
25000
PT06 Positive Vibes disbursement 2017 Q4
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Positive Vibes
GB-CHC-1038860-PITCHGlobalPolicy
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Global Policy Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. The project is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of their “Dialogue and Dissent” programme. The Global Policy element of PITCH involves the delivery of strategic advocacy at the European Union in Brussels, the United Nations in New York and Geneva, and at the U.S. Government in Washington D.C., as well as other key locations. This is carried out both by staff from Aidsfonds and Frontline AIDS, as well as by the following Global Policy partners contracted through PITCH: Free Space Process (a global network initiated by International Civil Society Support), International Drug Policy Consortium, Harm Reduction International, and the Robert Carr Civil Society Networks Fund. The focus of this global policy work is on three key themes: Human Rights (broadening the space for civil society, particularly AGYW and key populations and building a stronger voice); Sustainable Development Goals (HIV remains a priority on the global agenda); and Financing (ensuring sustained funding for HIV/AIDS, civil society and KPs/AGYW, both from donor and domestic resources). Moreover, PITCH funding as part of the Global Policy component of the programme has also been used to support research and advocacy work carried out by Frontline AIDS and PITCH partners in support of the development of a series of HIV Prevention shadow reports. These reports analyse the HIV prevention response of some of the countries with the highest HIV burden in the world. The reports track countries’ progress against key barriers outlined in the HIV prevention 2020 road map agreed by the Global HIV Prevention Coalition, and include specific recommendations to governments. Developed in partnership with community organisations each year, they shed light on areas often neglected by official HIV reporting. From the perspective of the global policy work of Aidsfonds and Frontline AIDS, both organisations allocate funding toward this work, in addition to the work of the members of the Free Space Process.
Harm Reduction International (HRI)
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC)
International Civil Society Support (ICSS)
Frontline AIDS
mail@frontlineaids.org
https://frontlineaids.org/
71852.89
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN12
33938
Frontline Aids
IDPC
421035.38
Frontline Aids
50000
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN12
18126
Frontline Aids
IDPC
170817
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN12
66689.21
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN40
75235
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN41
71392.98075
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN42
27557.62223
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN43
26400.2
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN44
61394
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN45
35686.01848
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN46
10118.41
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN41
26766
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN42
188066.57
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN12
14193
Frontline Aids
IDPC
10707
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN44
342968.1956
5905
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN12
66689
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN40
71269.88
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN41
44627
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN42
37906
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN12
27558
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN43
46384.84
Frontline Aids
IDPC
12984.76
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN44
60578.02
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN45
29866.66
Frontline Aids
International CSO/PTN46
600968.78
S2: Advocacy agenda set
This outcome focuses on demonstrating the changing capacities of PITCH partners to influence the advocacy agenda in their countries in
relation to the specific advocacy asks and rights of KPs and AGYW. The ability to influence and ‘set’ advocacy agendas is based on the ability to develop
evidence-based, strategic and targeted advocacy plans and activities that include clear recommendations for decision makers and other advocacy
targets.
IndS2.1 (HIV Prevention): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.1 (IDPC): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
M2: Advocacy targets engaged
This outcome focuses on the experiences of PITCH partners when engaging advocacy targets that can influence decision-making processes. These advocacy targets will be global, regional, national, or local government representatives and politicians, as well as religious and traditional leaders and the police etc. We are looking for evidence of these advocacy targets listening to local and national civil society, including youth and KP-led organisations. We are also looking for evidence of these advocacy targets amending or introducing new policies and encouraging practice and behaviour that responds to the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. Moreover, we are looking to draw connections between the increased capacity of PITCH partners and the effective engagement of these advocacy targets.
IndM2.1 (HRI): # of instances that global partners succeed in creating space to push PITCH advocacy priorities
IndM2.1 (PITCH/FSP): # of instances that global partners succeed in creating space to push PITCH advocacy priorities
IndM2.1 (IDPC): # of instances that partners succeed in creating space to push their advocacy agenda
IndM2.3 (IDPC): # of supportive communications made by decision makers in support of KP and AGYW health and rights including SRHR and gender equality
L2: Enabling legal and policy frameworks that are adequately resourced and implemented
With this outcome we want to understand the contribution of PITCH to legislation, and the implementation of this legislation, that is supportive of the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. This might involve the introduction of new policy and legislation in support of KPs and AGYW, as well as the blocking or retraction of laws and policies that restrict or prevent KPs and AGWY from accessing the services to which they have a right. We will look for evidence of decriminalisation, and of governments implementing existing laws and policies where they exist. Examples of new laws and policies might include, in Uganda, the implementation of the Antinarcotic Act, HIV Control Act, or Public Management Act, SRHR guidelines. In terms of reversing the application of restrictive laws and policies, this might include the removal of administrative sanctions (monetary penalties), which was reported in the context of Sex Workers in Ukraine.
IndL2.1 (PITCH/FSP): Number of existing and new policies and strategies influenced to meet the health needs and rights of those most affected by HIV
S3: Enhanced capacity to capture evidence
This outcome focuses on demonstrating increased capacity among PITCH partners to collect and use evidence (e.g. through reviews of reports
and other public documents, research using interviews and surveys, capturing data through monitoring activities etc) to inform their advocacy. It is
important that the focus of partners’ reporting is on explaining in what ways their capacity to document evidence has improved, and what they have done
with this evidence. This should be described and analysed by partners from the perspective of planning and implementing their advocacy. Where partners
feel that their evidence-based advocacy has contributed toward a change in policy, when reporting against the indicators below, please provide evidence
that illustrates how your advocacy contributed to this policy change.
IndS3.1: (HIV Prevenion) # country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.1: (FSP) # country partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.2: (HIV Prevention) # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by global partners to inform evidence-based dialogue
IndS3.2: (HRI) # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by global partners to inform evidence-based dialogue
IndS3.2: (PITCH/FSP) # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by global partners to inform evidence-based dialogue
S5: Local and national groups connected to regional and global bodies (e.g. African Union, ASEAN, Global Fund, UNAIDS etc)
Through this outcome we look to create space and opportunities for local and national CSOs in the nine target PITCH countries to inform the policy and advocacy work of PITCH colleagues at the regional (African Union and ASEAN) level and the global (Brussels, Geneva, London, The Hague, Washington DC and New York) level. In doing so, we strive to ensure that regional and global policy debates are informed by the realities of the challenges and experiences of KPs and AGYW at the national and local level (this is what we mean by evidence-based policy). PITCH Global level advocacy is focused on supporting civil society engagement with the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in particular aspects related to HIV, SRHR, key populations and ‘inequality within and between’ countries. PITCH Global level advocacy is also focused on supporting the realisation of the human rights of KPs and AGYW and broadening the space for civil society to advocate for those rights, as well as on ensuring sustained funding for HIV/AIDS, civil society and KPs/AGYW, both from donor and domestic resources.
IndS5.1 (IDPC): Global, regional and country partners meaningfully engage with regional and global policy processes and institutions
IndS5.1 (FSP): Global, regional and country partners meaningfully engage with regional and global policy processes and institutions
IndS5.2 (FSP): Amount of evidence of positive political changes at regional and global levels
S4: Engagement among stakeholders intensified
This outcome is designed to track the progress of PITCH partners in increasing their level of interaction with national level CSOs; social
justice networks; local, district and national level authorities; and international organisations including AU, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and WHO. We are
looking to better understand how PITCH is having an impact on the ability of partners to confidently engage in dialogue and collaborate with a range of
stakeholders that have an influence over changes in policy and practice in relations to meeting the needs of KPS and AGYW. Changes in the levels of
interaction are measured through the number of meetings etc between implementing partners and the stakeholders referred to here where advocacy is
carried out. Through this outcome we also seek to understand changes in the level of capacity and confidence to advocate with country, regional and
global level advocacy targets, and the impact this has on changes in levels of engagement between PITCH partners and these same stakeholders.
IndS4.1 (HIV Prevention): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (Global Policy/UHC) : # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level
M1: Inclusive coalitions organised
This outcome is focused on helping PITCH country partners to contribute toward the strengthening of coalitions that they are members of, by making these coalitions more inclusive of CSOs and others who advocate on behalf of KPs and AGYW. Where relevant coalitions do not already exist, PITCH helps partners to develop the skills they need in order to establish and facilitate coalitions that function effectively, have clear advocacy strategies in place, and that are genuinely inclusive. Inclusivity is measured both in terms of the coalitions’ membership as well as their ability to articulate the needs, rights and concerns of KPs and AGYW. We are measuring progress in line with this focus. We hope that by helping coalitions to become increasingly strategic, effective and inclusive that we will see evidence of increased collaboration among PITCH partners and coalition members as well as the enhanced coordinati
IndM1.1 (FSP): # of coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (IDPC): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
L1: With critical mass of support, civil society holds governments to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services
This outcome is concerned with achieving a long-term increase in the influence of civil society over government policy and funding of the national HIV response and, fundamentally, a reduction in barriers faced by Key Populations and AGYW to accessing services. Through this outcome PITCH will seek to achieve increased political commitment for HIV and SRHR services that target KPs and AGYW, and to develop the capacity of PITCH country partners to hold governments to account for the implementation of policies and other political commitments at all levels. With this outcome we hope to achieve a more informed and organised movement of community-led CSOs (KPs and AGYW) working together and engaging decision/opinion/policy makers, health care providers, religious leaders etc towards improving HIV and SRHR services (including implementation – funding, decriminalization, promoting harm reduction) for KPs and AGYW.
IndL1.1 (PITCH/FSP): Number of instances where global partners succeed to influence bilateral and multi-lateral donor commitments on sustained or increased funding for the AIDS response and key populations
IndL1.2: # of partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
GB-CHC-1038860-PITCHRegionalProgramme
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Regional Programme Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. The project is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of their “Dialogue and Dissent” programme. The Southern Africa Regional Programme element of PITCH is focused on lobbying and advocacy with a view to expanding HIV combination prevention services across the Southern Africa region. The regional programme was launched toward the end of 2018, and results data will therefore be published for 2019 and 2020 only. Two organisations are currently funded to implement this work as part of PITCH: the Aids and Rights Alliance for Southern Africa (ARASA) and the SRHR Africa Trust (SAT). ARASA is a regional partnership, working to reduce inequality, especially gender inequality and promote health, dignity and wellbeing in southern and east Africa. SAT is working to achieve sexual and reproductive health rights and gender equality across southern and eastern Africa. Frontline AIDS is responsible for managing the contractual relationships with ARASA and SAT.
Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights Africa Trust
AIDS and Rights Alliance for Southern Africa
mail@frontlineaids.org
https://frontlineaids.org/
453770.4
Frontline Aids
ARASA
39564.17
Frontline Aids
Regional CSO/PTN31
202729.61
Frontline Aids
ARASA
29000
Frontline Aids
Regional CSO/PTN31
665817.67
Frontline Aids
ARASA
29687.23
Frontline Aids
Regional CSO/PTN31
625943.32
Frontline Aids
ARASA
37381.77
Frontline Aids
Regional CSO/PTN31
S1: (Self) Stigma addressed
For this outcome Stigma refers to both the internal stigma (self-stigma) experienced and expressed by KPs and AGYW themselves, as well as
external stigma and discrimination expressed by decision makers and those with widespread influence (government, media etc) as well as communities, religious and traditional leaders, service providers, families etc toward KPs and AGYW. This outcome focuses on achieving changes in the beliefs, attitudes and behaviour of those who express this external stigma and discrimination, in the hope that KPs and AGYW experience less stigma and discrimination because of their HIV status and/or gender and sexuality over the course of PITCH. Our assumption is that as levels of external stigma reduce, incidences of self-stigma also reduce, contributing to an increase in public demand for access to HIV-related services for KPs and AGYW.
IndS1.1 (SAT): Decision makers/implementers demonstrate changed attitude towards KPs and AGYW on an issue or claim
IndS1.2 (SAT): Percentage of KP and AGYW who report to have recently experienced stigma and discrimination in relation to their HIV status and/or gender/sexuality
IndS1.3 (SAT): % Adolescent & Young People Living with HIV who express equitable gender norms with regard to decision making around sex and relationships
S3: Enhanced capacity to capture evidence
This outcome focuses on demonstrating increased capacity among PITCH partners to collect and use evidence (e.g. through reviews of reports
and other public documents, research using interviews and surveys, capturing data through monitoring activities etc) to inform their advocacy. It is
important that the focus of partners’ reporting is on explaining in what ways their capacity to document evidence has improved, and what they have done
with this evidence. This should be described and analysed by partners from the perspective of planning and implementing their advocacy. Where partners
feel that their evidence-based advocacy has contributed toward a change in policy, when reporting against the indicators below, please provide evidence
that illustrates how your advocacy contributed to this policy change.
IndS3.1 (SAT): # of partners with improved capacity to capture evidence aligned to their advocacy work
IndS3.2 (SAT): # of new evidence produced or existing evidence synthesised by country partners to inform their advocacy efforts
S4: Engagement among stakeholders intensified
This outcome is designed to track the progress of PITCH partners in increasing their level of interaction with national level CSOs; social
justice networks; local, district and national level authorities; and international organisations including AU, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and WHO. We are
looking to better understand how PITCH is having an impact on the ability of partners to confidently engage in dialogue and collaborate with a range of
stakeholders that have an influence over changes in policy and practice in relations to meeting the needs of KPS and AGYW. Changes in the levels of
interaction are measured through the number of meetings etc between implementing partners and the stakeholders referred to here where advocacy is
carried out. Through this outcome we also seek to understand changes in the level of capacity and confidence to advocate with country, regional and
global level advocacy targets, and the impact this has on changes in levels of engagement between PITCH partners and these same stakeholders.
IndS4.1 (SAT): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.1 (ARASA): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (SAT): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
IndS4.2 (ARASA): # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level.
M2: Advocacy targets engaged
This outcome focuses on the experiences of PITCH partners when engaging advocacy targets that can influence decision-making processes. These advocacy targets will be global, regional, national, or local government representatives and politicians, as well as religious and traditional leaders and the police etc. We are looking for evidence of these advocacy targets listening to local and national civil society, including youth and KP-led organisations. We are also looking for evidence of these advocacy targets amending or introducing new policies and encouraging practice and behaviour that responds to the needs and rights of KPs and AGYW. Moreover, we are looking to draw connections between the increased capacity of PITCH partners and the effective engagement of these advocacy targets.
IndM2.1 (ARASA): Level of involvement by country partners in local and national strategy and policy formation
L1: With critical mass of support, civil society holds governments to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services
This outcome is concerned with achieving a long-term increase in the influence of civil society over government policy and funding of the national HIV response and, fundamentally, a reduction in barriers faced by Key Populations and AGYW to accessing services. Through this outcome PITCH will seek to achieve increased political commitment for HIV and SRHR services that target KPs and AGYW, and to develop the capacity of PITCH country partners to hold governments to account for the implementation of policies and other political commitments at all levels. With this outcome we hope to achieve a more informed and organised movement of community-led CSOs (KPs and AGYW) working together and engaging decision/opinion/policy makers, health care providers, religious leaders etc towards improving HIV and SRHR services (including implementation – funding, decriminalization, promoting harm reduction) for KPs and AGYW.
IndL1.1: (SAT) Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting LGBT
IndL1.2 (SAT): # of partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
S2: Advocacy agenda set
This outcome focuses on demonstrating the changing capacities of PITCH partners to influence the advocacy agenda in their countries in
relation to the specific advocacy asks and rights of KPs and AGYW. The ability to influence and ‘set’ advocacy agendas is based on the ability to develop
evidence-based, strategic and targeted advocacy plans and activities that include clear recommendations for decision makers and other advocacy
targets.
IndS2.1 (SAT): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.1 (ARASA): Extent which country partners utilize advocacy opportunities to share policy positions and strategies with relevant stakeholders
IndS2.2 (SAT): # of country partners with evidence based advocacy strategy or plan with clear policy targets and recommendations
M1: Inclusive coalitions organised
This outcome is focused on helping PITCH country partners to contribute toward the strengthening of coalitions that they are members of, by making these coalitions more inclusive of CSOs and others who advocate on behalf of KPs and AGYW. Where relevant coalitions do not already exist, PITCH helps partners to develop the skills they need in order to establish and facilitate coalitions that function effectively, have clear advocacy strategies in place, and that are genuinely inclusive. Inclusivity is measured both in terms of the coalitions’ membership as well as their ability to articulate the needs, rights and concerns of KPs and AGYW. We are measuring progress in line with this focus. We hope that by helping coalitions to become increasingly strategic, effective and inclusive that we will see evidence of increased collaboration among PITCH partners and coalition members as well as the enhanced coordination of advocacy activities with aligned messaging.
IndM1.1 (ARASA): # of country coalitions with a joint advocacy strategy
GB-CHC-1038860-28437
Frontline AIDS
Core funding to support Frontline AIDS' strategy
We are a global movement igniting innovations that break through social, political and legal barriers that stand in the way of a future free from AIDS. This programme provides core funding to support activities by the Frontline AIDS Secretariat and Linking Organisations to achieve the results set out in the Frontline AIDS results framework. Results reported under this activity are achieved with all Frontline AIDS funding including core funding from this activity, restricted funding for programmes, and funding from other donors.
We focus our investment in countries where we can make the biggest impact, and we concentrate our efforts on those most affected but often ignored. In all of the countries where we work, we focus on those most vulnerable to HIV. This includes marginalised or criminalised people such as LGBT people, sex workers and people who use drugs. In countries where women and girls are disproportionately affected, this is where we direct our attention, alongside the marginalised groups. Another strong focus of our work is young people (0-19 years) who account for 40% of all new HIV infections globally. Most people living with HIV, as well as some of the world’s poorest, live in middle-income countries. This poses a significant challenge, as overseas aid is rapidly being withdrawn from many of the countries where we work. With millions of people still not accessing the services they need we cannot afford to shy away from this challenge. Key populations are groups that are vulnerable to, or affected by, HIV and AIDS. Their involvement is vital to an effective response. Key populations vary according to the local context but are usually marginalised or stigmatised because of their HIV status or social identities. They include people living with HIV, their partners and families, people who sell sex, men who have sex with men, transgender people, people who use drugs, children affected by HIV and AIDS, refugees, migrants, displaced people and prisoners. We believe the lives of all human beings are equal and everyone has the right to access the HIV information and services they need for a healthy life. That’s why our programmes and our advocacy take a human rights response.
Strategic Response 1: Increase access to quality HIV and health programmes Strategic Response 2: Support community-based organisations to be connected and effective elements of health systems Strategic Response 3: Advocate for HIV, health, gender, and human rights Strategic Response 4: A stronger partnership that is evidence-based and accountable to communities
Frontline AIDS
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
ACS/AMO Congo
AIDS Care China
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
Alliance for Public Health (APH)
Alliance Nationale Contre le SIDA en Cote d'Ivoire (ANS CI)
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
Alliance Regional Technical Support Hub South Asia
Anti-AIDS Association (AAA)
Asian Network of People who Use Drugs (ANPUD)
Asia-Pacific Transgender Network (APTN)
Asociacion Atlacatl Vivo Positivo
Association Marocaine de Solidarité et Développement (AMSED)
African Sex Worker Alliance (ASWA)
Botswana Network on Ethics, Law and HIV/AIDS (BONELA)
Centre for Supporting Community Development Initiatives (SCDI)
Colectivo Sol
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
Co-ordinating Assembly of Non-Governmental Organisations (CANGO)
Corporación Kimirina
The Humsafar Trust (HST)
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
Initiative Privée et Communautaire de lutte contre le VIH/SIDA (IPC)
Instituto para el Desarrollo Humano (IDH)
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO)
KHANA
LEPRA Society
Malaysian AIDS Council (MAC)
Malaysian AIDS Foundation (MAF)
MENAHRA
NACOSA
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD)
Positive Vibes
Promoteurs Objectif Zerosida (POZ)
REDLACTRANS
RedTraSex
Rumah Cemara
SIDC
TACOSODE
Vasavya Mahila Mandali (VMM)
Via Libre
Global Network of Young People Living with HIV (Y+)
Netherlands-Ministry of Foreign Affairs
This activity ended early as a new strategy for the organisation was developed a year earlier than originally planned. Therefore a new activity has been set up for the new strategy.
Frontline AIDS
mail@frontlineaids.org
http://www.frontlineaids.org
9989000
9980
Anti-AIDS Association (AAA) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anti-AIDS Association (AAA)
19966.59
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
17509.57
ACS/AMO Congo disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ACS/AMO Congo
29233.01
AIDS Care China disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Care China
274485.4
Alliance for Public Health disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
229307.77
India HIV/AIDS Alliance disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
27750.49
AIDS Legal Network (ALN) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
13607.22
Association Marocaine de Solidarité et Développement (AMSED) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Association Marocaine de Solidarité et Développement (AMSED)
284521.55
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
17606.23
Asian Network of People who Use Drugs (ANPUD) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asian Network of People who Use Drugs (ANPUD)
43249.83
Alliance Nationale Contre le SIDA en Cote d'Ivoire (ANS CI) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale Contre le SIDA en Cote d'Ivoire (ANS CI)
18000
Asia Pacific Coalition on Male Sexual Health (APCOM) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asia Pacific Coalition on Male Sexual Health (APCOM)
18000
Asia-Pacific Transgender Network (APTN) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asia-Pacific Transgender Network (APTN)
17770.93
International HIV/AIDS Alliance Foundation disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance Foundation
20000
Asociacion Atlacatl Vivo Positivo disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asociacion Atlacatl Vivo Positivo
55865.75
Botswana Network on Ethics, Law and HIV/AIDS (BONELA) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Botswana Network on Ethics, Law and HIV/AIDS (BONELA)
5080.62
Co-ordinating Assembly of Non-Governmental Organisations (CANGO) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Co-ordinating Assembly of Non-Governmental Organisations (CANGO)
19731.15
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
48033.46
Colectivo Sol disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Colectivo Sol
23385.92
Fundación Huésped disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Fundación Huésped
9890.469999999999
Humsafar Trust (HST) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Humsafar Trust (HST)
23328.11
Instituto para el Desarrollo Humano (IDH) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Instituto para el Desarrollo Humano (IDH)
40592.74
International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA
26828.28
Initiative Privée et Communautaire de lutte contre le VIH/SIDA (IPC) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Initiative Privée et Communautaire de lutte contre le VIH/SIDA (IPC)
95071.83
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO)
26884.26
KHANA disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KHANA
84039.87
Corporación Kimirina disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Corporación Kimirina
19780.94
LEPRA Society disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
LEPRA Society
66536.56
Malaysian AIDS Council (MAC) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Malaysian AIDS Council (MAC)
66148.86
MAMTA Health Institute for Mother and Child disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
MAMTA Health Institute for Mother and Child
8621.98
NACOSA disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
NACOSA
8227.41
Network for the Enhacement of Life and Health (NELAH) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Network for the Enhacement of Life and Health (NELAH)
8621.98
NACOSA commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
NACOSA
19901.72
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD)
234026.87
Positive Vibes disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Positive Vibes
41000
Promoteurs Objectif Zerosida (POZ) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Promoteurs Objectif Zerosida (POZ)
19980.57
REDLACTRANS disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
REDLACTRANS
29942.27
RedTraSex disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
RedTraSex
39015.9
Rumah Cemara disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
4987.42
Centre for Supporting Community Development Initiatives (SCDI) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Centre for Supporting Community Development Initiatives (SCDI)
42423.13
Alliance Regional Technical Support Hub South Asia disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Regional Technical Support Hub South Asia
3159.89
TACOSODE disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
TACOSODE
28400.16
UHAI disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
UHAI
208116.74
Via Libre disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Via Libre
29942.27
RedTraSex commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
RedTraSex
19806.13
Vasavya Mahila Mandali (VMM) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Vasavya Mahila Mandali (VMM)
22233.48
Y+ disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Y+
9980
Anti-AIDS Association (AAA) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Anti-AIDS Association (AAA)
19966.59
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
17509.57
ACS/AMO Congo commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
ACS/AMO Congo
29233.01
AIDS Care China commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Care China
274485.4
Alliance for Public Health commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance for Public Health
229307.77
India HIV/AIDS Alliance commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
27750.49
AIDS Legal Network (ALN) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
AIDS Legal Network (ALN)
13607.22
Association Marocaine de Solidarité et Développement (AMSED) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Association Marocaine de Solidarité et Développement (AMSED)
284521.55
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
17606.23
Asian Network of People who Use Drugs (ANPUD) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asian Network of People who Use Drugs (ANPUD)
43249.83
Alliance Nationale Contre le SIDA en Cote d'Ivoire (ANS CI) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Nationale Contre le SIDA en Cote d'Ivoire (ANS CI)
18000
Asia Pacific Coalition on Male Sexual Health (APCOM) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asia Pacific Coalition on Male Sexual Health (APCOM)
18000
Asia-Pacific Transgender Network (APTN) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asia-Pacific Transgender Network (APTN)
17770.93
International HIV/AIDS Alliance Foundation commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance Foundation
20000
Asociacion Atlacatl Vivo Positivo commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Asociacion Atlacatl Vivo Positivo
55865.75
Botswana Network on Ethics, Law and HIV/AIDS (BONELA) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Botswana Network on Ethics, Law and HIV/AIDS (BONELA)
5080.62
Co-ordinating Assembly of Non-Governmental Organisations (CANGO) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Co-ordinating Assembly of Non-Governmental Organisations (CANGO)
19731.15
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU)
48033.46
Colectivo Sol commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Colectivo Sol
23385.92
Fundación Huésped commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Fundación Huésped
9890.469999999999
Humsafar Trust (HST) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Humsafar Trust (HST)
23328.11
Instituto para el Desarrollo Humano (IDH) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Instituto para el Desarrollo Humano (IDH)
40592.74
International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance USA
26828.28
Initiative Privée et Communautaire de lutte contre le VIH/SIDA (IPC) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Initiative Privée et Communautaire de lutte contre le VIH/SIDA (IPC)
95071.83
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium (KANCO)
26884.26
KHANA commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
KHANA
84039.87
Corporación Kimirina commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Corporación Kimirina
19780.94
LEPRA Society commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
LEPRA Society
66536.56
Malaysian AIDS Council (MAC) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Malaysian AIDS Council (MAC)
66148.86
MAMTA Health Institute for Mother and Child commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
MAMTA Health Institute for Mother and Child
8227.41
Network for the Enhacement of Life and Health (NELAH) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Network for the Enhacement of Life and Health (NELAH)
19901.72
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD)
234026.87
Positive Vibes commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Positive Vibes
41000
Promoteurs Objectif Zerosida (POZ) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Promoteurs Objectif Zerosida (POZ)
19980.57
REDLACTRANS commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
REDLACTRANS
39015.9
Rumah Cemara commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Rumah Cemara
4987.42
Centre for Supporting Community Development Initiatives (SCDI) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Centre for Supporting Community Development Initiatives (SCDI)
42423.13
Alliance Regional Technical Support Hub South Asia commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Alliance Regional Technical Support Hub South Asia
3159.89
TACOSODE commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
TACOSODE
28400.16
UHAI commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
UHAI
208116.74
Via Libre commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Via Libre
19806.13
Vasavya Mahila Mandali (VMM) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Vasavya Mahila Mandali (VMM)
22233.48
Y+ commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Y+
-5977.23
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar) disbursement 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
-5977.23
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar) commitment 2016
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Myanmar (Alliance Myanmar)
8032288.36
Secretariat spend 2016
3913043.56
Netherlands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
3913043
Netherlands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
-10800.58
20000000
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
972905
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
20000000
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
972905.66
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
972905.66
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
39000000
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
3913043
Netherlands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
15000000
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
15000000
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
3913043
Netherlands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
972905.66
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
972905.66
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
972905.66
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Report and Accounts 2017
Our impact in 2017
HIV, Health and Rights: Sustaining Community Action
Annual Report and Accounts 2018
Reports and Accounts 2016
Frontline AIDS: Organisation web page
Annual Report and Accounts 2019
Strategic Response 1: Increase access to HIV and health programmes
Frontline AIDS will increase the coverage, scope and quality of HIV, harm reduction and SRHR programmes. We will do this by focusing on those people most in need and using an HIV continuum of care framework. We remain resolutely focused on having an impact on HIV. Using a person-centred approach, it is essential we increase our capacity to manage co-infections and co-morbidities, with increased focus on SRHR. In all that we do we will take a human rights-based approach. Our focus will be on key populations, adolescents affected by and at risk of HIV, women and girls in all their diversity, and people whose HIV vulnerability and health is impacted by gender-based violence.
OUTPUT INDICATOR 1.1: Number of adults, adolescents and children accessing HIV treatment, care and support
This indicator measures enrollment in HIV care related to timely initiation and monitoring of ART for adults and children and key population groups. HIV care is a lifelong care that helps to identify when to start ART, monitor treatment success and address other patient health needs, thus contributing to reduction of mortality among people living with HIV.
In general, the data tells a positive story about how Frontline AIDS has moved forward with its treatment agenda. Since 2014, the scale of our treatment work has improved substantially. For the fourth year running, community-led support to people enrolled in care and treatment programmes was largely driven by the Global Fund Vihaan programme in India. The programme is implemented by India HIV/AIDS Alliance and reached 1,100,483 people in 2016.
Since 2014, the scale of our treatment, care and support work has increased substantially. For the fifth year running, community-led support to people enrolled in care and treatment programmes was largely driven by the Global Fund Vihaan programme in India. The programme is implemented by India HIV/AIDS Alliance and in 2017 reached 1,212,547 people. The Organisation for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD) in Ethiopia is the second largest provider of treatment, care and support services, with 67,602 people living with HIV benefiting from their outreach, an 86% increase from 2016. Of those reached with HIV treatment, care, and support services, 10% were children and adolescents (aged 19 or under). Substantial numbers were reached by India HIV/AIDS Alliance, and OSSHD (Ethiopia) and IPC (Burkina Faso), while FACT (Zimbabwe) led the way in reaching young people aged 20–24 in Africa. In addition to service delivery, Linking Organisations have contributed to several policy and advocacy achievements in 2017 relating to treatment, care and support.
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context.
Where disaggregated data is available, the group most commonly reached were sex workers (almost 11,000) followed by men who have sex with men (MSM) (over 5,000). 17% of those reached were under 24 years. As in previous years, the total reach figure was largely driven by the Global Fund Vihaan programme in India implemented by India HIV/AIDS Alliance. Whilst 15 LOs reported increases on this indicator compared with 2017, overall global reach has decreased (outside of the Indian Vihaan programme). This is mainly attributed to the ending of a number of programmes (such as those funded by the Global Fund or USAID). The reduction in our reach is sometimes as a result of governments taking over service provision. Whilst on the face of it this is a positive development, questions remain about the quality of services. We fear that, in some settings, services are being scaled back to very basic levels, with a possible negative impact on long term retention in care and therefore on people’s survival.
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context.
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context.
OUTPUT INDICATOR 1.2 Number of people provided with integrated HIV/Sexual and Reproductive Health services
This indicator shows the total number of people reached who are at an elevated risk of HIV, and people living with HIV by: (i) one or more interventions listed under intervention areas described in the Link Up Standard Intervention Package and (ii) any other defined HIV/SRH intervention package e.g. Integra Initiative
One factor behind the reduced reach on this indicator was the 2016 closing-out of the multi-country SRHR programme, Link Up. However, globally, our coverage under this indicator expanded from 23 countries in 2015 to 26 countries in 2016. We anticipate that the re-imposition of the United States’ Mexico City Policy may have an adverse impact on this indicator in 2017, whilst the implementation of our new SRHR programmes in 2017 (READY Teens, READY+ and the SRHR Umbrella programme in Uganda) should help increase our reach.
For the second year running, MAMTA (India) is the largest contributor towards this indicator and in 2017 their reach increased by almost one million people. This is a result of the Ahana programme, which aims to improve access to prevention of parent-to-child transmission (PPTCT) services amongst pregnant women. Ahana is a national programme supported by the Global Fund that MAMTA is implementing in 38 districts in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Despite the end of the multi-country SRHR programme Link Up in 2016 and the re-imposition of the Global Gag Rule, the READY portfolio is ensuring young people continue to receive services in eastern, central, and southern Africa. These projects (READY Teens and READY+) are working with adolescents and young people on SRHR and HIV. In addition to service delivery, LOs are creating a more enabling environment for young people to access services. Mahamate (formerly Alliance Myanmar) together with the Myanmar Youth Stars Network engaged in the development of a National Youth Policy. They worked to ensure that youth representatives from key populations were able to participate in the consultation, and in 2017 this policy was endorsed and launched by the government. As well as referencing LGBT youth as a category with specific needs, it also provides a space to discuss SRHR issues affecting young people.
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context.
This is an increase on our 2017 reach, although MAMTA in India remains by far the largest contributor to this figure, reaching more than 1.2 million people. Sixteen LOs reported increases on this indicator compared with 2017, and six Linking Organisations reached more than 100,000 people with integrated HIV/SRHR services. Of those reached globally with integrated HIV/SRHR services, 48% were under the age of 24. More than 200,000 people living with HIV and 143,000 sex workers were reached.
This indicator was discountinued in 2019
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context.
OUTPUT INDICATOR 1.3 Number of people from key population groups reached with a defined package of targeted HIV prevention activities
This indicator provides information on the total number of individuals from key populations groups (sex workers, men who have sex with men, transgender people and people who use drugs) that receive a basic (minimum) package of HIV prevention interventions. Packages will vary with context.
For this indicator the reduction in people reached was almost entirely due to the ending of Pehchan, the biggest Global Fund prevention programme with MSM and transgender individuals. This had been run by India HIV/AIDS Alliance in consortium with the Humsafar Trust and other partners. Some of the services have been taken over by the Government of India and we are exploring ways to better monitor their continuation. Frontline AIDS Linking Organisations remain global leaders in mobilising key populations. Under this indicator, people who use drugs were the largest group (303,456), closely followed by sex workers (301,068) MSM (218,421) and transgender people (17,662).
Frontline AIDS Linking Organisations continue to be global leaders in reaching key populations with HIV prevention activities. Although we have not met our target under this indicator, in comparison with 2016 figures we have achieved a 5% increase in the number of people from key populations reached with HIV prevention services. The main reason we did not meet this target is that some of the assumptions behind the target have changed. For example, when we set the target at the beginning of the strategy period in 2015, it was on the basis that two large Global Fund projects managed by Linking Organisations in Senegal and India would focus on delivering prevention services to key populations. However, this is no longer the case. The Alliance was successful in promoting a more coherent approach to key population programming in Africa, in particular through the KP Connect programme. In 2017, we reached 206,158 people from key population groups in Africa with a defined package of HIV prevention services, representing a steady increase from the 97,592 people reached at the start of the Frontline AIDS strategy, and a 14% increase from 2016. This is all the more remarkable given the increasingly hostile policy environment for LGBT people in Africa. In addition to service delivery, advocacy in 2017 aimed to create a more enabling environment for key populations.
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context.
In total we reached 5,188,969 people with HIV prevention activities in 2018, one-third of whom were under the age of 24. Of the four key population groups this indicator counts, sex workers was the largest group reached.
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context.
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context..
OUTPUT INDICATOR 1.4: Number and percentage of Linking Organisations scaling up the use of prevention, biomedical and ICT technologies that increase access to, and use of, HIV services contributing to improved health outcomes
This indicator is a proxy for innovation within Frontline AIDS, where innovation is defined as the provision of, or referral to, the following services: medical male circumcision, preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for Hepatitis C treatment, and ICT technologies.
Sixteen Linking Organisations provided at least one of the innovations directly and 23 either provided directly or referred people to at least one innovation: 14 Linking Organisations provided or referred people to PEP treatment; 14 Linking Organisations were involved in ICT interventions; and 12 provided or referred people to DAA’s for Hepatitis C
This indicator is a proxy for innovation within the Alliance, where innovation is defined as the provision of, or referral to, the following services: voluntary medical male circumcision; pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP); post exposure prophylaxis (PEP); HIV self-testing; direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for Hepatitis C treatment; ICT technologies; and differentiated ART delivery models. Nineteen LOs have reported providing at least one of these services or referring individuals to a service. Seventeen of those LOs have either started service provision or have scaled up their activities from 2016.
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context.
Fifteen Linking Organisations were counted as contributing to this indicator, ten of whom provided at least one of these services for the first time. For example, in 2018 CANGO (Coordinating Assembly of NGOs, in Swaziland) reached 445 people with a differentiated ART delivery strategy involving support groups and community ART strategies. For example, one member of a group can collect ART from the health facility on behalf of other members. All members get a chance to collect ART on a rotation basis, which gives each member a chance to go through a health practitioner’s assessment to promote adherence. The most common innovations provided by LOs are mobile and/or web-based initiatives, provision of PrEP and PEP. There was no scale up of DAAs for Hepatitis C treatment in 2018, but VMMC services were provided by Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU) in 2018 (in 2017 no LOs provided VMMC).
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context.
This indicator was discountinued in 2019
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context.
OUTPUT INDICATOR 1.5: Number and percentage of Linking Organisations who have documented ability to track their contribution along the HIV care cascade
The HIV continuum of care, also known as the HIV treatment cascade or HIV care cascade, is a conceptual framework used to describe and monitor the consecutive steps, from initial diagnosis to sustained viral suppression, which people living with HIV go through.
24 Linking Organisations were able to track their contribution along at least two steps in the care cascade, and of these, nine Linking Organisations were able to track their contribution along the whole continuum of care. Viral load testing is not routine in many places and providing data for this step is less common and a challenge for some Linking Organisations.
The HIV continuum of care, also known as the HIV treatment cascade or HIV care cascade, is a framework used to describe and monitor the consecutive steps, from initial diagnosis to sustained viral suppression. Twenty LOs reported being able to track their contribution for at least two steps on the care cascade. Thirteen LOs reported tracking individuals along the entire care cascade: from the first stage of being tested and diagnosed as HIV positive, to being linked to HIV care for a first assessment, to starting ART, and then to achieving viral suppression. Unless organisations run their own clinic, it can be challenging to track individuals along the whole care cascade. For example, one LO commented that while they conduct HIV tests, people who have tested positive are then entered into the public health information system and the data is not shared with civil society organisations.
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context.
Twenty-three Linking Organisations reported that they are able to track their contribution to at least two steps on the care cascade. Of those, six LOs reported that they can track individuals along the whole care cascade: from the first stage of being tested and diagnosed as HIV positive, to being linked to HIV care for a first assessment, to starting ART, and where possible, to achieving viral suppression.
Target revised in 2018 due to changes in context.
This indicator was discountinued in 2019
Strategic Response 1: Increase access to HIV and health programmes
Frontline AIDS will increase the coverage, scope and quality of HIV, harm reduction and SRHR programmes. We will do this by focusing on those people most in need and using an HIV continuum of care framework. We remain resolutely focused on having an impact on HIV. Using a person-centred approach, it is essential we increase our capacity to manage co-infections and co-morbidities, with increased focus on SRHR. In all that we do we will take a human rights-based approach. Our focus will be on key populations, adolescents affected by and at risk of HIV, women and girls in all their diversity, and people whose HIV vulnerability and health is impacted by gender-based violence. Results are achieved under SR1 with all Frontline AIDS funding including core funding, restricted funding for programmes, and funding from other donors.
OUTCOME INDICATOR 1a: Number and percentage of Frontline AIDS countries contributing 10% or more of the national coverage for HIV prevention, care or treatment, as reported to national HIV coordinating bodies or based on population size estimation
This figure is made up of two different types of data: the contribution of each Linking Organisation to national HIV targets and the percentage of key populations they reach (based on population size estimates). They are counted if they report 10% or more to either of these measures.
Overall, in 16 countries Linking Organisations demonstrate contributing to the national HIV response: Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cote d’Ivoire, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Morocco, Myanmar, Senegal, South Africa, Uganda and Ukraine. This represents 59% of the 27 countries where the Alliance has a Linking Organisation. This shows that over half of Alliance Linking Organisations are very significant in the national HIV response, especially in reaching key populations. Of these 16 countries, 8 are Global Fund PRs and 7 are Global Fund SRs.
This indicator shows that more than half of Alliance Linking Organisations are significant actors in their respective national HIV responses, particularly in reaching key populations. Some Linking Organisations are contributing far more than 10% to national coverage indicators: AMSED (Morocco), ANS-CI (Cote d’Ivoire), APH (Ukraine), IPC (Burkina Faso) and KHANA (Cambodia) are contributing more than 50% to national targets.
Target revised in 2018 due to context changes.
In more than half 5 of the 24 countries where we have a Linking Organisation (LO), those organisations are significant actors in the HIV response. Prevention with key populations is where the Partnership is making the largest contribution to national targets. Sex workers are the population group most commonly reached in significant numbers. However, this might be because there are far fewer population size estimations for men who have sex with men and transgender people.
Target revised in 2018 due to context changes.
This indicator was discountinued in 2019
Target revised in 2018 due to context changes.
Strategic Response 3: Inclusive & Engaged Societies
We will continue to address harmful social norms, including stigma, discrimination and social attitudes. We will advocate for structural and policy changes that will improve access to – and availability, affordability and quality of – health services without discrimination, and also promote gender equity, sexual and reproductive rights (SRH) and human rights. We will focus on driving change at all levels and building broader coalitions. Within this strategy period, we will expand our services in countries with some of the most hostile and challenging legal and policy environments.
OUTPUT INDICATOR 3.1: Number of countries where Frontline AIDS has technical or financially fostered advocacy with organisations and representatives of adolescents, women and girls and key populations
The indicator measures the level of support of Frontline AIDS to the advocacy work of organisations and representatives of adolescents, women and girls, and key population to influence policy processes on HIV to be rights and evidence based.
31 Frontline AIDS partners (including Linking Organisations and recipients of the Rapid Response Fund) in 26 countries said they had technically or financially fostered advocacy with organisations and representatives of adolescents, women and girls and key populations.
Our achievements range from securing office spaces for sex worker organisations to delivering radical new policies and legislation which shapes national debates on issues facing key populations globally. Achievements within the Partnership to Inspire, Transform and Connect the HIV response (PITCH) programme range from securing health-focused language in draft drug and sex work legislation in Myanmar, to a landmark authorisation by the Ugandan Ministry of Health to Community Health Alliance Uganda (CHAU) and the Ugandan Harm Reduction Network (UHRN) to launch the first ever needle and syringe programme in Uganda. In addition to supporting emergency responses, the Rapid Response Fund has supported CBOs to advocate for improved legal and policy environments for LGBT. Results of these efforts are reported under other indicators.
Target updated in 2018 to reflect changes in context.
Target updated in 2018 to reflect changes in context.
This indicator was discontinued for 2019
Target updated in 2018 to reflect changes in context.
OUTPUT INDICATOR 3.2: Number of countries where Frontline AIDS has documented and responded to individual cases of violence and discrimination through emergency responses, legal services or other
17 Linking Organisations in 14 countries provided data on the number of cases of violence and discrimination they have documented and provided emergency responses to in 2016. The Rapid Response Fund supported emergency responses in 13 countries. REAct and the Rapid Response Fund are examples of systems or processes in use by Frontline AIDS in addition to a range of other approaches by Linking Organisations. The most common type of human rights interventions undertaken by Linking Organisations in 2016 were stigma and discrimination-related activities and legal literacy.
The most common type of human rights interventions undertaken by Linking Organisations in 2017 were stigma and discrimination-related activities and legal literacy. REAct and the Rapid Response Fund are examples of systems or processes used by Frontline AIDS in addition to a range of other approaches by LOs.
Target updated in 2018 due to changed context.
In 20 countries, 38 Frontline AIDS partners have documented and responded to individual cases of violence and discrimination through emergency responses, legal services or other responses. REAct and the Rapid Response Fund are examples of systems or processes used by Frontline AIDS' in addition to a range of other approaches by LOs.
This indicator was discontinued for 2019
OUTPUT INDICATOR 3.3: Number of countries where Frontline AIDS is playing a role in holding governments to account in upholding human rights, enabling universal access to services and increasing domestic financing of the national HIV response
In 28 countries, Frontline AIDS has played a role in holding governments to account through upholding human rights, enabling universal access to services or increasing domestic financing of the national HIV response. This includes work done by 33 organisations (both Linking Organisations and recipients of the Rapid Response Fund).
Universal health coverage (UHC) has been an expanding area of work for the Frontline AIDS. The governments of Senegal and Vietnam have made UHC a key priority for their health reform policies. As national aid is declining, the Alliance has supported ANCS and SCDI, to conduct research and hold national dialogues to better understand the current health policy and the financing context of their countries, and how the implementation of social health insurance supports people living with HIV and key populations. As a result, the Senegalese government initiated a policy for inclusion of key populations into the national UHC strategy and in Vietnam the government initiated a dialogue with civil society on current gaps identified in the research. Positive Vibes and the Open Society Foundation co-coordinated a global meeting on the decriminalisation of same-sex sexual conduct, bringing together 54 international human rights organisations, activists and government representatives to share good practices. Following this, Diversity Alliance Namibia attended a Public Hearing on Racism, Racial Discrimination and Discrimination in General to request the removal of antiquated sodomy laws from the Penal Code. This was followed by a week-long advocacy campaign, Out Right Namibia and LifeLine/ChildLine, which celebrated the lived experience of LGBT persons in Namibia.
Target updated in 2018 due to changing context.
As part of holding governments to account for providing universal access to services, we engaged in dialogue about Universal Health Coverage (UHC) at the national, regional and global level. Supported by PITCH, we organised a UHC Workshop in Hanoi, Vietnam in November 2018, which was attended by 40 participants from 22 countries. The workshop offered an opportunity for civil society participants to identify the risk and opportunities of UHC and discuss strategies and advocacy actions to ensure that the HIV response and the needs of the most marginalised are addressed in the provision of UHC.
Target updated in 2018 due to changing context.
This indicator was discontinued for 2019
Target updated in 2018 due to changing context.
OUTPUT INDICATOR 3.4: Number of people reached by programmes addressing stigma, discrimination and social exclusion.
This indicator measures the number of persons reached with community initiatives focused on reducing stigma and discrimination towards people living with, or vulnerable to HIV infection. For reporting on 2017 onwards we slightly changed how we define this indicator, which previously only counted countries with high levels of stigma as rated by the PLHIV stigma index. We have changed this to recognise that stigma and discrimination does not just affect PLHIV, but all key populations, which results in barriers to accessing HIV services and other human rights abuses.
In 2016, Frontline AIDS reached 379,429 people with programmes addressing stigma and discrimination in countries with high levels of stigma. This indicator includes only the reach of Linking Organisations in countries with high levels of stigma (as measured in the PLHIV stigma index). Linking Organisations reached 6,009 health workers, 2,121 police, 1,976 community leaders and 1,332 government officials with activities designed to reduce the incidence of stigma and discrimination.
In total, 42% of those reached with activities intended to help people address stigma and discrimination, or cope with the consequences of it, were people living with HIV, 29% were MSM and 10% were sex workers. Of those who might enact stigma or have discriminatory practices, LOs reached 6,691 health workers, 1,951 police, 2,305 community leaders and 2,748 government officials.
Target updated in 2018 to reflect changing context.
In 2018 the Partnership reached 353,168 people with programmes addressing stigma and discrimination; this includes programmes reaching those coping with stigma and discrimination, and individuals who are key to reducing stigma and discrimination, such as police. More than 96,000 people living with HIV, 43,000 men who have sex with men and 30,000 sex workers were reached globally. Police and health workers were the most commonly reached groups of state actors.
Target updated in 2018 to reflect changing context.
This indicator was discontinued for 2019
Strategic Response 3: Inclusive & Engaged Societies
We will continue to address harmful social norms, including stigma, discrimination and social attitudes. We will advocate for structural and policy changes that will improve access to – and availability, affordability and quality of – health services without discrimination, and also promote gender equity, sexual and reproductive rights (SRH) and human rights. We will focus on driving change at all levels and building broader coalitions. Within this strategy period, we will expand our services in countries with some of the most hostile and challenging legal and policy environments. Results are achieved under SR3 with all Alliance funding including core funding, restricted funding for programmes, and funding from other donors.
OUTCOME INDICATOR 3a: Number and percentage of Frontline AIDS countries where Linking Organisations and implementing partners are making significant, evidence based contribution to developing or improving policies which impact the lives of people affected by HIV
This indicator serves to analyse Frontline AIDS' ability to influence HIV, health, and rights policies with the aim of creating enabling environments for PLHIV. Indicator wording updated in 2018 to also count implementing partners to reflect Frontline AIDS' changing partnership model.
In 2016, 15 Linking Organisations and Frontline AIDS partners in 12 countries contributed to developing or improving policies that impact the lives of people living with HIV. Across Frontline AIDS, Linking Organisations were involved in a range of advocacy activities that included contributing to new legislation, guidance and strategic plans; advocating for new treatments and litigating for access to antiretroviral drugs; challenging the way key populations are treated by the police and authorities; and campaigning for the use of PrEP in the public health sector and improved access to treatment, health insurance and legal services for people living with HIV.
Changes in policy and the enabling environment often take years. Across Frontline AIDS we are seeing organisations at different stages of the process, from starting up a pilot demonstration project and seeing it funded and taken on by government, to bringing civil society together to review a bill and seeing that bill reflect their needs.
Target updated in 2018 due to changing context.
Examples of some of the advocacy successes Frontline AIDS' partners contributed to in 2018 include: ● Our advocacy and support for LGBT rights around the world brought heartening success in three countries in 2018. The Rapid Response Fund supported campaigners in Guyana to challenge a cross-dressing law that had been used to criminalise transgender people. The Fund also helped Jason Jones in his case against the Government of Trinidad and Tobago, which led to the country’s High Court removing laws prohibiting same-sex relationships. In India, a landmark ruling announced by the country’s Supreme Court decriminalised homosexuality between consenting adults. Both Humsafar Trust and India HIV/AIDS Alliance campaigned for this and a writ petition was submitted. ● In Cote d’Ivoire the platform of civil society organisations working on HIV and health, led by Alliance Nationale Contre le SIDA en Côte d’Ivoire (ANS-CI), successfully advocated to prevent the demolition of one of the main treatment centres for TB in Abidjan. ● Through PITCH in Mozambique, LAMBDA (an organisation advocating for the rights of LGBT) has become a member of the Ministry of Health and National AIDS Council technical working group for key populations, where they are now involved in the development of policy and national strategy formation at the national level. ● FACT contributed to the new public health act in Zimbabwe. They successfully lobbied for recognition of the need to decriminalise HIV transmission. ● In Vietnam a decree on voluntary addiction treatment was released as a result of SCDI’s advocacy efforts over almost two years. People who are enrolled in voluntary drug treatment will now have 70% of their costs covered, with a simplified enrolment and a minimum treatment period reduced from one year to six months. SCDI worked closely with the Department of Social Vices Prevention to input into the decree.
Target updated in 2018 due to changing context.
This indicator was discontinued for 2019
Target updated in 2018 due to changing context.
Strategic Response 2: Stronger health and community systems
We will continue our focus on strengthening community responses to end AIDS. Frontline AIDS will work with others to build national ‘systems for health’ that integrate community systems, public health and private sectors, recognising that all actors are supporting a national response that is broader than the government response alone. In order to achieve resilient and sustainable systems for health we will place even greater emphasis on linking to the formal health system, task shifting where communities are properly remunerated, new business models and product lines, and collaborating with the private sector where goals are shared. It is our intention that, wherever we work, strong community-based organisations will address the HIV and health needs of their communities, while both working with governments and holding them to account. Frontline AIDS will continue to support organisations to strengthen their impact on HIV, whether through direct service delivery, providing technical assistance or monitoring both human rights violations and service delivery as a watchdog. Results are achieved under SR2 with all Frontline AIDS funding including core funding, restricted funding for programmes, and funding from other donors.
OUTCOME INDICATOR 2a: Number and percentage of Frontline AIDS Linking Organisations making documented improvements to their organisational capacity, governance and programme quality as a result of Alliance capacity building and OD initiatives (including Accreditation and internal audit)
This is a proxy indicator for capacity strengthening, and measures the number of Linking Organisations making improvements to their governance, organisational development and programming as evidenced by passing the Frontline AIDS accreditation peer review process. This indicator was updated in 2018 to also include improvements made due to internal audit.
Frontline AIDS is making an ever-greater imprint in supporting the capacity building of Southern organisations (both Linking Organisations and CBOs). 7 Linking Organisations were accredited in 2016, bringing the total accredited since 2013 to 25 out of the 29 who have initiated the accreditation process.
This is a cumulative indicator tracked since the start of the strategy. Frontline AIDS accreditation system promotes good governance, organisational management and good practice HIV programming across our Linking Organisations. It guides the admission of new organisations and maintains standards for existing LOs. Using assessment teams from peer organisations, we rigorously assess national organisations against the highest standards. The accreditation process is designed to guarantee quality in service delivery and promote South-to-South learning and development. The process helps us to identify capacity issues and track whether they have been addressed. Two LOs were accredited in 2017 (NACOSA and AIDS Legal Network in South Africa). Since implementing the strategy in 2013, a total of 34 LOs have initiated the accreditation process and 26 have been accredited. Since 2013, a total of 324 capacity issues have been identified, and 278 capacity issues addressed, across governance and sustainability, organisational management, HIV programming and technical areas through the accreditation process. South learning throughout the process, especially during the LO-to-LO peer review team visits. In 2017, staff from nine LOs took part in an accreditation peer review visit.
Target updated in 2018 due to context changes.
Fifteen LOs documented improvements in areas of organisational capacity, governance and programming through accreditation and audit in 2018. Three LOs were accredited in 2018: CANGO, MAMTA and APH. This comes to a total of 29 LOs accredited since the start of Cycle 2, and 315 areas for improvement that have been addressed. During 2018 LOs addressed 37 accreditation standards. In addition, as a result of internal audits, 163 recommendations were made, of which 138 have already been addressed by LOs. For 2018 we changed this indicator to focus on annual improvements made, rather than cumulative improvements made since the start of the strategy. Our target of 22 organisations making improvement therefore may have been ambitious given that the majority of LOs have already passed Cycle 2 of accreditation, and thus already demonstrate good practice in governance, management and programming.
Target updated in 2018 due to context changes.
This indicator was discontinued for 2019
Target updated in 2018 due to context changes.
Strategic Response 2: Stronger health and community systems
We will continue our focus on strengthening community responses to end AIDS. The Frontline AIDS will work with others to build national ‘systems for health’ that integrate community systems, public health and private sectors, recognising that all actors are supporting a national response that is broader than the government response alone. In order to achieve resilient and sustainable systems for health we will place even greater emphasis on linking to the formal health system, task shifting where communities are properly remunerated, new business models and product lines, and collaborating with the private sector where goals are shared. It is our intention that, wherever we work, strong community-based organisations will address the HIV and health needs of their communities, while both working with governments and holding them to account. Frontline AIDS will continue to support organisations to strengthen their impact on HIV, whether through direct service delivery, providing technical assistance or monitoring both human rights violations and service delivery as a watchdog.
OUTPUT INDICATOR 2.1: Percentage of CBOs receiving grants through Frontline AIDS that achieved planned programme and financial targets.
This is a proxy indicator for increasing CBO capacity, and measures CBO performance as defined by their ability to spend an allocated budget within a specified time period and achieve programmatic objectives for all programmes.
17 Linking Organisations reported that on average 82% of the CBOs they support achieved their programme and financial targets. This indicator continues to be a barometer of how well Alliance-supported CBOs are performing, and is a proxy measure for whether these organisations have the appropriate capacity. Linking Organisations provide capacity building on a huge range of topics; from programming and technical knowledge (such as HIV, SRHR, gender-sensitive approaches, parenting programmes, psychological support, outreach, life skills, vocational skills, harm reduction) to organisational and leadership capacity (such as grant and financial management, monitoring and evaluation, legal literacy and fundraising).
Twenty LOs reported that on average 85% of the CBOs they support achieved their programme and financial targets. This indicates how well Frontline AIDS -supported CBOs are performing and is a proxy measure for whether these organisations have the capacity they need to be effective. LOs provide capacity-building on a huge range of topics from programming and technical knowledge (HIV, SRHR, gender-sensitive approaches, parenting programmes, psychological support, outreach, life skills, vocational skills, harm reduction) to organisational and leadership capacity (grant and financial management, monitoring and evaluation, legal literacy and fundraising).
This indicator was discontinued for 2019
OUTPUT INDICATOR 2.2: Total Frontline AIDS global expenditure in the last 12 months
Global income refers to all income by Frontline AIDS as a whole – including the Secretariat and Linking Organisations. Indicator was updated in 2018: from measuring income to measuring expenditure as this is what is reported.
In 2016, total global Frontline AIDS family expenditure is $132 million. The actual and forecasted expenditure for 2016 and 2017 continues two trends that started in 2015; a lowering year-on-year of total family expenditure and a reduction in the level of expenditure within the Secretariat compared with the rest of the Family, albeit Secretariat expenditure broadly staying level. The primary reason for the year on year reductions since 2014 has been a more challenging external funding environment. In particular, there has been a decline in funding to MICs, where the Alliance global partnership has a sizeable presence through its Linking Organisations. The biggest overall driver of reduced family expenditure is the continuing lowering of Global Fund funding/expenditure to MICs. However, the share of funds channelled through the Secretariat in Brighton to Linking Organisations has decreased, which represents progress in increasing the capacity of Linking Organisations to become strong, effective, financially independent organisations.
The amount recorded is in USD.
There has been a year-on-year decline in total Frontline AIDS partnership expenditure since 2014. The key driver of this decline has been an increasingly challenging external environment and, in particular, a reduction in funding for HIV/AIDS-related causes. For a number of years, there has been a decline in HIV/AIDS funding to middle-income countries from institutional donors; a geographical area where the Frontline AIDS global partnership has a sizeable presence. Coupled with this, global funding for HIV/AIDS across all countries has declined for three consecutive years from 2015 to 2017.
The amount recorded is in USD.
Target updated in 2018 due to context changes.
The amount recorded is in USD.
This result reversed a four-year decline from 2014 to 2017. Over this period, an increasingly challenging external environment and a reduction in donor funding for HIV/AIDS-related causes had reduced Frontline AIDS partnership income and expenditure. The decline in global funding was particularly focussed on middle-income countries - a geographical area where the Frontline AIDS global partnership has a sizeable presence. In 2018 however, the size of Frontline AIDS partnership grew. A new linking organisation in Zimbabwe joined the partnership and submitted its first financial report for 2018, contributing $9.4 million of expenditure to the partnership accounts. A slight decline in total income is forecasted for 2019, to $135 million. This again reflects the general trend of tightening overseas development funding for HIV, particularly in middle-income countries.
The amount recorded is in USD.
Target updated in 2018 due to context changes.
The amount recorded is in USD.
OUTPUT INDICATOR 2.3: Number of peer review journal articles that inform programming or analyse Frontline AIDS' contribution to improved health outcomes for key populations, young people (15-24) and women and girls
This is a proxy indicator for Frontline AIDS' ability to generate and use evidence (links to objectives of the global Frontline AIDS Research Strategy). Indicator wording updated in 2018 to include articles that inform programming as well as those that analyse our contribution to health outcomes.
Frontline AIDS continues to share its experience at the community level in order to inform practice and improve technical capacity. Thirty-three articles were published in peer-reviewed journals, a threefold increase compared to 2015. The main contributor to this indicator is KHANA’s Centre for Population Health Research, which contributed 42% of all Frontline AIDS peer-reviewed articles.
In 2017, a total of 45 peer reviewed journal articles were published by Frontline AIDS LOs or the secretariat. The studies not only include those which analysed the Frontline AIDS' contribution to health outcomes (previously the wording of this indicator), but also needs assessments, acceptability studies and baselines. We have therefore changed the definition of the indicator to reflect this. A key achievement in 2017 was a Supplement on the Link Up project which was published in the Journal of Adolescent Health and explored SRHR services for young people most affected by HIV. This featured evaluations and other research generated through the Link Up project.
Target changed in 2018 to reflect our investment in research capacity.
See the Frontline AIDS evidence map for an overview of our research: https://frontlineaids.org/evidence-map/
Target changed in 2018 to reflect our investment in research capacity.
This indicator was discontinued in 2019
Target changed in 2018 to reflect our investment in research capacity.
OUTPUT INDICATOR 2.4: Percentage of CBOs receiving grants through Frontline AIDS to deliver programmes that submitted timely reports according to national guidelines
This indicator measures the extent to which CBOs are connected with the government and contributing to the national response through sharing of data or receiving funding. This is another proxy to show the capacity of CBOs who received support from LOs.
On average, 79% of CBOs receiving grants from Linking Organisations submit timely reports to the government according to national guidelines.
Fifteen LOs reported data against this indicator in 2018.
This indicator was discontinued in 2019
GB-CHC-1038860-PITCHStrategicFlexibleInvestments
Frontline AIDS
PITCH Strategic Flexible Investments DRM Frontline AIDS
We know that those most affected by HIV are best placed to influence and shape the policies, laws and practices needed to end the AIDS epidemic in their country. PITCH is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs working with those most affected by HIV in enabling these groups to transform (inter)national HIV responses by strengthening their advocacy skills and capacities and promoting innovative evidence-informed practice. This will enable them to sustainably advocate for a more effective response to ensure all people have equal access to sexual and reproductive health services, including HIV-related services. For five years, these partners will jointly works towards ending the AIDS epidemic in the regions and countries most affected by HIV through an inclusive, in-country, in-depth approach to national and international lobbying and advocacy. The project is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of their “Dialogue and Dissent” programme. Today, millions of people do not access services due to the cost. Many others receive poor quality of services even when they pay out-of-pocket. Carefully designed and implemented health financing policies can help to address these issues. A key element of a sustainable health financing is robust public budgeting and domestic resources mobilization (DRM) process in countries. The latter is how a country raises, allocates, and spends their own funds to finance services, including health. DRM is often discussed in the context of increasing tax revenue, but financial resources for health can be mobilized from many other sources as well and through efficiency gains. In 2020, Frontline AIDS provided funding and technical assistance to partner organisations across Sub Saharan Africa and in Indonesia, in order to support their advocacy for this robust public budgeting and DRM process.
AIDS and Rights Alliance for Southern Africa
Rumah Cemara
01273718900
mail@frontlineaids.org
https://frontlineaids.org/
993225.75
Frontline Aids
ARASA(2)
211203595
Frontline Aids
Rumah Cemara(2)
320000
Frontline Aids
ARASA(2)
515546.34
Frontline Aids
ARASA(2)
76658693
Frontline Aids
Rumah Cemara(2)
455219.09
Frontline Aids
ARASA(2)
416031671
Frontline Aids
Rumah Cemara(2)
312675186
Frontline Aids
Rumah Cemara(2)
391299841
1679992
S4: Engagement among stakeholders intensified
This outcome is designed to track the progress of PITCH partners in increasing their level of interaction with national level CSOs; social
justice networks; local, district and national level authorities; and international organisations including AU, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and WHO. We are
looking to better understand how PITCH is having an impact on the ability of partners to confidently engage in dialogue and collaborate with a range of
stakeholders that have an influence over changes in policy and practice in relations to meeting the needs of KPS and AGYW. Changes in the levels of
interaction are measured through the number of meetings etc between implementing partners and the stakeholders referred to here where advocacy is
carried out. Through this outcome we also seek to understand changes in the level of capacity and confidence to advocate with country, regional and
global level advocacy targets, and the impact this has on changes in levels of engagement between PITCH partners and these same stakeholders.
IndS4.1 (DRM Indonesia): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level
IndS4.1 (DRM Kenya): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level
IndS4.1 (DRM Zimbabwe): # of meetings/foras/symposiums with decision makers in which country partners represent themselves and share their positions/advocacy asks at country, regional and global level
IndS4.2 (DRM Indonesia) : # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level
IndS4.2 (DRM Kenya) : # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level
IndS4.2 (DRM Nigeria) : # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level
IndS4.2 (DRM Zimbabwe) : # of country partners with improved capacity to engage with stakeholders at country, regional and global level
M1: Inclusive coalitions organised
This outcome is focused on helping PITCH country partners to contribute toward the strengthening of coalitions that they are members of, by making these coalitions more inclusive of CSOs and others who advocate on behalf of KPs and AGYW. Where relevant coalitions do not already exist, PITCH helps partners to develop the skills they need in order to establish and facilitate coalitions that function effectively, have clear advocacy strategies in place, and that are genuinely inclusive. Inclusivity is measured both in terms of the coalitions’ membership as well as their ability to articulate the needs, rights and concerns of KPs and AGYW. We are measuring progress in line with this focus. We hope that by helping coalitions to become increasingly strategic, effective and inclusive that we will see evidence of increased collaboration among PITCH partners and coalition members as well as the enhanced coordination of advocacy activities with aligned messaging.
IndM1.2 (DRM Indonesia): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (DRM Kenya): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (DRM Nigeria): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
IndM1.2 (DRM Zimbabwe): Level of influence by the country coalitions based on a joint advocacy strategy
L1: With critical mass of support, civil society holds governments to account, uses evidence from constituencies, shapes an effective funded national HIV response, and reduces barriers to services
This outcome is concerned with achieving a long-term increase in the influence of civil society over government policy and funding of the national HIV response and, fundamentally, a reduction in barriers faced by Key Populations and AGYW to accessing services. Through this outcome PITCH will seek to achieve increased political commitment for HIV and SRHR services that target KPs and AGYW, and to develop the capacity of PITCH country partners to hold governments to account for the implementation of policies and other political commitments at all levels. With this outcome we hope to achieve a more informed and organised movement of community-led CSOs (KPs and AGYW) working together and engaging decision/opinion/policy makers, health care providers, religious leaders etc towards improving HIV and SRHR services (including implementation – funding, decriminalization, promoting harm reduction) for KPs and AGYW.
IndL1.1 (DRM Indonesia): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.1 (DRM Kenya): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.1 (DRM Zimbabwe): Level of political commitment for HIV and SRHR services targeting KPs and AGYW
IndL1.2 (DRM Indonesia): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL1.2 (DRM Kenya): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL1.2 (DRM Nigeria): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
IndL1.2 (DRM Zimbabwe): # of country partners with improved capacity to hold their governments accountable for the implementation of national (such as reform agenda), global and regional commitments
GB-CHC-1038860-strategicfunding
Frontline AIDS
Core funding to support delivery of Frontline AIDS' Global Plan of Action
The Global Plan of Action drives the work of the Frontline AIDS partnership between 2020 and 2025. The Plan sets out ten critical actions that we will prioritise to help the world secure a future free from AIDS for everyone, everywhere.
We believe that if the 10 actions in this plan are successful, they will make a significant contribution towards global efforts to reduce new HIV infections and AIDS-related deaths.
No single organisation can end AIDS alone. We must work collectively, bringing our skills and experience in HIV, health and human rights to address the challenges that drive the epidemic.
Our Global Plan of Action is a call to action for everyone who wants a future free from AIDS.
We work with marginalised people who are denied HIV prevention, treatment and care simply because of who they are and where they live. This includes people living with HIV, sex workers, people who use drugs, transgender people, gay men and other men who have sex with men, as well as adolescent girls and women.
- Speak truth: Our global and national engagement will galvanise urgent action on AIDS, particularly around the crisis in HIV prevention.
- Unlock barriers: Our advocacy with communities will challenge social and gender norms and influence governments and other institutions to develop and implement laws, plans and policies to ensure full access to services.
- Invest in solutions: We will tailor our innovative solutions to respond to the needs of the most marginalised people.
- Build a sustainable future: Our technical assistance for civil society and governments will enhance the delivery, governance and monitoring of comprehensive national HIV responses.
Frontline AIDS
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
AIDS Care China
Alliance Burundaise Contre le SIDA (ABS)
Alliance for Public Health (APH)
Alliance Nationale Contre le SIDA en Cote d'Ivoire (ANS CI)
Alliance Nationale des Communautés pour la Santé (ANCS)
Association Marocaine de Solidarité et Développement (AMSED)
Botswana Network on Ethics, Law and HIV/AIDS (BONELA)
Centre for Supporting Community Development Initiatives (SCDI)
Co-ordinating Assembly of Non-Governmental Organisations (CANGO)
Corporación Kimirina
The Humsafar Trust (HST)
India HIV/AIDS Alliance
Initiative Privée et Communautaire de lutte contre le VIH/SIDA (IPC)
Instituto para el Desarrollo Humano (IDH)
KHANA
LEPRA Society
NACOSA
Organization for Social Services, Health and Development (OSSHD)
Positive Vibes
Promoteurs Objectif Zerosida (POZ)
REDLACTRANS
RedTraSex
Rumah Cemara
SIDC
Vasavya Mahila Mandali (VMM)
Via Libre
Global Network of Young People Living with HIV (Y+)
Associação Comunitária Ambiente da Mafalala (ACAM)
Arab foundation for freedoms and equality
Association de Lutte Contre le Sida (ALCS)
Alive Medical Services (AMS)
Frontline AIDS
mail@frontlineaids.org
http://www.frontlineaids.org
7845628
802663.78
PD01 Frontline AIDS spend 2021
47360.24
PD02 Frontline AIDS spend 2021
305428.36
PD03 Frontline AIDS spend 2021
324830.96
PD04 Frontline AIDS spend 2021
696247.75
SD05 Frontline AIDS spend 2021
269978.57
SD06 Frontline AIDS spend 2021
1226350.8
SD07 Frontline AIDS spend 2021
321386.05
SD08 Frontline AIDS spend 2021
2878341.38
CC Frontline AIDS spend 2021
25000
PD04 Accountability International disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Accountability International
23075.15
PD01 ANCS disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
ANCS
25128.1
PD01 Alive Medical Services - Not Umbrella disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Alive Medical Services - Not Umbrella
0
CC CEDO - SIDASRHR partner disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
CEDO - SIDASRHR partner
187.55
CC ANCS disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
ANCS
10000
SD05 ICASO USD disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
ICASO USD
10449.31
SD05 Education As A Vaccine Against AIDS (EVA disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Education As A Vaccine Against AIDS (EVA
24990
PD01 Gays And Lesbians Of Zimbabwe disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Gays And Lesbians Of Zimbabwe
2531.69
CC Frontline AIDS - South Africa disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Frontline AIDS - South Africa
5843.16
PD03 Int'l Drug Policy Consortium (GBP) disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Int'l Drug Policy Consortium (GBP)
19000
PD01 INPUD USD disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
INPUD USD
20594.49
PD01 Alliance India disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Alliance India
0
CC Int'l Drug Policy Consortium (GBP) disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Int'l Drug Policy Consortium (GBP)
10137.35
SD05 LEPRA disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
LEPRA
9918.41
SD05 Corporacion Kimirina disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Corporacion Kimirina
17241.38
PD01 NACOSA disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
NACOSA
24235.22
PD01 LVCT Health disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
LVCT Health
54500.05
PD04 SafAIDS disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
SafAIDS
37633.72
PD04 Rumah Cemara disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Rumah Cemara
23800.49
PD01 REPSSI disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
REPSSI
177.62
CC Redlactrans disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Redlactrans
461997.62
Outgoing committment - unrestricted partner grants
Frontline AIDS
0
Frontline AIDS
Frontline AIDS
3932584
BuZa final year strategic funding
Frontline AIDS
0
CC Alive Medical Services UGANDA disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Alive Medical Services UGANDA
1337.7
SD08 Equal International disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Equal International
9683.5
SD05 Redtrasex disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Redtrasex
10491.5
SD05 MAMTA disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
MAMTA
10167.69
SD05 Alliance India disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Alliance India
3952.96
SD05 Alliance for Public Health (Ukraine) disbursement 2021
Frontline AIDS
Alliance for Public Health (Ukraine)
Global Plan of Action 2020-2025
This Global Plan of Action drives the work of the Frontline AIDS partnership between 2020 and 2025. The Plan sets out ten critical actions that we will prioritise to help the world secure a future free from AIDS for everyone, everywhere.
Our Impact in 2020: Annual Report
2021 Report and Accounts
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs SRHR Results Framework (4): The sexual and reproductive rights of all people, including those belonging to marginalized groups, are institutionally respected & protected.
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs SRHR Results Framework 4H: Changes in (inter)national laws, policies, norms and practices leading to decrease of barriers to SRHR and HIV/AIDS services
Note this also includes 5 changes reported under the PITCH programme
Examples include:
The Zimbabwe government’s latest National HIV/AIDS Strategic Plan IV 2021–2025 commits the Government to promote private–public partnerships in health, such as social contracting with civil society organizations and using revenues from the AIDS Levy. Frontline AIDS supported the development of Prevention Shadow reports which made recommendations to the National AIDS Council about including social contracting as a mechanism. Frontline AIDS also funded SAFAIDS to support CSOs in in discussions around the National Social Contracting Framework for HIV.
In Malawi – the launch of oral PrEP guidelines was a win for civil society after years of concerted advocacy supported through the Frontline AIDS partnership.
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs SRHR Results Framework 4I: Description of effective use of accountability mechanisms by citizens / communities and civil society organizations towards SRHR of all people
This includes 40 changes reported already under the READY programme, and 7 reported under the PITCH programme
Examples of accountability mechanisms include:
SAfAIDS in Zimbabwe: Through a process that saw CSOs trained and capacitated in understanding HIV health financing and budget advocacy, community-led organization in Zimbabwe are effectively influencing budget discussions and decision-making at a regional and national level.
Frontline AIDS supported partner Rumah Cemara to support Budget Advocacy Forums in Indonesia. These are made up of community led organisations who have collected and used data to identify gaps and develop policy papers to make recommendations. They are now effectively influencing decision making at the district and regional level on health financing, domestic resource mobilisation and strengthen community responses to health
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs SRHR Results Framework 4J: Number of communities, CSOs and advocacy networks with increased lobby and advocacy capacities
Changes reported in communities and CSOs. This includes 4 reported under the Dutch funded READY+ programme, 1 from a Swedish SIDA funded programme, and 199 reported under the Dutch funded PITCH programme.
Please note this information is not consistently collected across our work, so this is likely to be an underestimate. Examples include:
Frontline AIDS supported SAfAIDS to train and support 41 community led organisations in Zimbabwe to participate in budget meetings. They were trained on HIV health financing and budget advocacy and developed action plans that include identifying local budget priorities.
Through the READY+ programme Her Voice Zimbabwe Youth Network has been working with 12 key population youth led networks to ensure that together they shape an amplified response from different communities to advance advocacy relating to challenges faced within their communities in access to services.
Through READY+ inception visits in 2021 resulted in strengthened Y+ networks in Malawi and Zambia. Y+ Global in collaboration with country networks then reached 159 young leaders with training and mentorship to advocate at national, regional and global level.
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs SRHR Results Framework (2D): Improved access to SRH and HIV/AIDS medicines and commodities
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs SRHR Results Framework 2D: Number of innovative SRH (incl. HIV/AIDS) medicines and commodities or production/distribution options that have proof of concept or have successfully been brought to scale, according to own project definition.
For example:
Due to the formation of the Female Genital Schistosomiasis Integration group (FIG), convened by Frontline AIDS, Avert (Frontline AIDS partner and FIG core partner) received donor funding to integrate Female Genital Schistosomiasis into their Boost App for community health workers. FIG is an innovative health partnership focused on integration of FGS, HIV, cervical cancer and SRHR
The Netherlands MoFA funded READY+ programme supported the development of a caseload planner to track beneficiaries along the testing, care and treatment cascade to improve the efficiency of Community Adolescent Treatment Supporters (CATS) work and improve caseload planning.
ACTION 2 – COINFECTION: Drive conversations with governments and donors to secure integrated testing, treatment and care for HIV-TB/HIV-Hepatitis C to stop people living with HIV from dying.
Percentage of 'expect to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Following the onset of COVID-19 in early 2020, we developed a Call to Action on HIV, TB and COVID-19, which was endorsed by almost 200 civil society partners, from global coalitions to frontline community organisations. The Call urges the international community to sustain progress on HIV and TB, to adapt HIV and TB programmes to also address COVID-19, and to protect human rights. We have used it to sound the alarm in key spaces like the UNAIDS PCB, the AIDS 2020 conference and in the UNAIDS strategy process. At the June 2020 Programme Coordinating Board, the UNAIDS Executive Director Winnie Byanyima specifically referenced the Call in her opening address and called on governments and donors to sustain their commitments to the AIDS response despite the new pandemic. Ms Byanyima has been an increasingly vocal advocate for HIV prevention and the newly finalised global AIDS strategy reflects an increased focus on the prevention crisis and the need to break down barriers to access for key populations, adolescents and women.
Percentage of 'like to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
ACTION 3 PREVENTING VIOLENCE: Work with marginalised people and their communities to prevent and respond to violence to improve access to and uptake of HIV services.
Percentage of 'expect to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
In response to the increase in gender-based violence brought about by COVID-19, we developed resources for partners to support them to address gender and HIV in the context of COVID-19. This is a lens that has been largely missing from other resources looking at either the gender dynamics of COVID-19 or its impact on the HIV response.
During 2020, we continued to advocate for stronger investment in addressing the linkages between violence against women and girls and HIV, and to strengthen commitments to gender equality and human rights in the new UNAIDS and Global Fund strategies. To mark the 25th anniversary of the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, we highlighted the Unfinished Business19 of the Beijing agreement to protect women and girls from HIV. We joined with feminist organisations to push the agenda around violence against women and HIV at AIDS 2020 where we launched our report "Violence is everywhere". At AIDS 2020 we also focused on the harmful and disruptive nature of US foreign policies, in particular the negative impact of the Global Gag Rule on communities affected by HIV and joined advocates around the world in calling for its permanent repeal.
Percentage of 'like to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
ACTION 4 HUMAN RIGHTS: Convene community networks to document and respond to human rights violations to hold governments and the private sector to account.
Percentage of 'expect to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Reports of human rights violations increased as COVID-19 spread, throwing up new questions about rights and restrictions during an emergency. Our partners wanted to use REAct – our flagship community-led human rights monitoring and response programme – to support their communities, but first we needed to adapt it to make it fit for purpose during COVID-19 times. We had to support existing users to continue to implement REAct in this new environment and find ways to provide training and technical support virtually.
Six countries were due to start implementing REAct when the COVID-19 crisis struck and, determined not to delay, we converted the usual four-day face-to-face training workshop into a series of webinars with an accompanying training manual. Documentation tools were adjusted to better capture gender-based violence incidents and to assist partners to provide linkages to services. The need for stronger support systems led to us creating an online community of practice – a space for organisations that are implementing REAct to share information, opportunities and experiences.
In 2020, REAct went live in six new countries: Uganda, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Lebanon, Uzbekistan and Russia. It is now being actively implemented in 12 countries in total. Altogether, 2,233 clients were registered, and 2,345 cases documented across the REAct portfolio in 2020. One outcome worth highlighting was in Moldova where legislation related to marginalised people remains repressive and discriminatory. REAct evidence recorded that in the city of Orhei, 27 cases of people who use drugs were having to travel to another city 50km away to receive opioid agonist treatment. This data has enabled partners to enter into negotiations with the Ministry of Health about the opening of an OAT site closer to home.
Percentage of 'like to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Action 5 SOCIAL NORMS: Challenge harmful and discriminatory social and gender norms that prevent marginalised people from claiming their right to health.
Percentage of 'expect to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
We strengthened gender-transformative approaches in several of our programmes including PITCH where we built the capacity of partners to apply a gender-transformative lens in their advocacy, helped by our guides "What does it take to achieve a gender-transformative HIV response?" and "Engendering universal health coverage". Under the SRHR Umbrella programme, we started to build a stronger focus on preventing and responding to gender-based violence through awarding grants that aim to accelerate community-led innovation in this area.
In Zimbabwe, we contributed to mainstreaming gender equality and social inclusion within the organisations and institutions that are part of the four-year Evidence and Collaboration for Inclusive Development (ECID) programme. We did this by embedding the Looking In Looking Out (LILO) methodology originally developed by our partner Positive Vibes to address negative attitudes towards people with diverse sexual orientation, sex workers and people who use drugs. Participants reported a significant improvement in understanding concepts related to gender, marginalisation and diversity, and indicated a commitment to working more inclusively – especially with and for people with disabilities – and to addressing internalised gender biases and prejudices.
Percentage of 'like to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Action 6 INNOVATIVE PROGRAMMING: Innovate, evidence and promote tailored, sustainable and inclusive prevention, treatment and care programmes* to reach marginalised people living with, or at risk of acquiring, HIV which can be taken to scale by governments.
Percentage of 'expect to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Communities affected by HIV have been the driving force behind some of the most inspiring responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Together with our partners, we have extensively redesigned how we serve and support people with HIV programmes when it is not possible to meet them face to face or unsafe to attend clinical services. All over the world, our partners flexed swiftly and decisively to find different ways of reaching their clients, from organising home deliveries of antiretrovirals by bicycle and take-out methadone doses to telephone counselling, online outreach and more. We are proud to say that, despite many restrictions, people are still being reached with lifesaving HIV and SRHR services. Indeed, our flagship SRHR Umbrella Grant programme in Uganda managed to reach more than 600,000 people in its lifetime, with most of that taking place in the past year.
In the first integrated HIV and neglected tropical disease (NTD) programme of its kind, together with our Kenyan partner LVCT we are addressing the intersection between HIV and female genital schistosomiasis (FGS). Through a pilot programme that has the potential to radically reduce HIV risk for women and girls, we are developing new ways of screening and support for both issues. In another first, the pilot has involved LVCT working with the Kenyan Ministry of Health’s NTD department from inception and the organisation is now looking at ways to include FGS strategies in its USAID-funded DREAMS project that focuses on HIV prevention among adolescent girls and young women.
Throughout 2020, we have continued to develop and advocate for innovative packages of support for people who use drugs. Important advocacy wins were the significant increase in harm reduction funding in Mozambique, and the opening of Uganda’s first OAT programme, which was a result of years of advocacy by the Ugandan Harm Reduction Network (UHRN), supported by PITCH. The programme opened at Butabika hospital in Kampala in October 2020 and, with funding from PEPFAR, the clinic has been integrated into a public health facility. All referrals are made from UHRN’s drop-in centres where psychosocial support officers prepare people to enrol in the OAT programme and offer support once they are enrolled.
In Myanmar, our Integrated Harm Reduction Programme funded our partner Mahamate to appoint 12 peer counsellors in government-run drug treatment centres. Their role is to improve people who use drugs’ adherence to OAT (including new clients), support their involvement in HIV prevention and treatment and to offer psychosocial support. They also play an important administrative role assisting with data entry, restocking supplies and packaging take-home doses of OAT which became an essential function during the pandemic.
Percentage of 'like to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
ACTION 1 HIV PREVENTION: Engage and influence governments and donors to improve access to comprehensive HIV prevention services (including comprehensive sexuality education and harm reduction) to stop marginalised people acquiring HIV.
Percentage of 'expect to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Using platforms like the Commission on the Status of Women, the UNAIDS Programme Coordinating Board meetings and the Global HIV Prevention Coalition, we have been vocal in demanding political leadership for HIV prevention, full funding, and action to remove discriminatory laws, end harmful gender norms and roll out comprehensive sexuality education. As a result, during the course of 2020, we have seen increased recognition with UNAIDS, the Global Fund and other donors now acknowledging HIV prevention as an urgent priority. Whilst Frontline AIDS cannot claim to have singlehandedly brought about such a shift, our unrelenting focus on fighting back for prevention has undoubtedly helped to influence opinion.
With the Global Fund in the process of preparing its next strategy, Frontline AIDS and partners produced a series of regional papers for Fund board members making the case for prioritising HIV prevention, especially among marginalised populations, as well as investing in community responses. In January 2021, we organised a series of regional meetings to ensure that partners had the opportunity to continue inputting to the Global Fund strategy process in detail.
From our attention-grabbing "Don’t You Forget About Me" video for World AIDS Day and our noisy and determined online presence at AIDS 20209 to shadow reports tracking progress on prevention, together with our partners we have seized every opportunity to bang the drum for HIV prevention. Providing a community perspective, the seven shadow reports have catalysed significant policy changes at national level. In Malawi, HIV prevention advocates used the 2020 shadow report alongside those from the previous two years to get the government to update or establish size estimates for men who have sex with men, trans people and sex workers, and develop programmatic targets and HIV service packages for these groups. In Zimbabwe, advocacy off the back of the past three years’ shadow reports contributed to the development of the country’s first national drug masterplan, which includes a focus on harm reduction. In Nigeria, the first-ever harm reduction programme got off the ground under the country’s Global Fund grant thanks to Frontline AIDS’ efforts. In Kenya, the work of our partners resulted in there finally being official recognition at a policy level of trans people having specific HIV-related needs.
Percentage of 'like to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Action 7 ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES: Invest in partnerships to create tailored economic and educational opportunities for people living with HIV in order to improve their quality of life as well as HIV prevention and treatment outcomes.
Percentage of 'expect to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Although this area of work was deprioritised in 2020 due to Covid-19, there are still examples of progress, such as increasing economic opportunities for the most marginalised through the READY+ and SRHR Umbrella programmes and the huge efforts that have gone into providing livelihood support and basic food security that were needed due to COVID-19 across the partnership.
Percentage of 'like to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Action 8 MENTAL HEALTH: Invest in, and advocate for greater recognition of and research into, mental health services for people living with HIV in order to improve their quality of life as well as HIV prevention and treatment outcomes.
Percentage of 'expect to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
In our SRHR Umbrella programme in Uganda, a mid-term review in 2019 taught us that we needed to invest more in support for mental health and livelihoods, so during 2020 we trialled new packages of support in these areas. Community-based screening and referrals and training of peer supporters in understanding mental health were delivered in 2020 and will help us understand how we can leave behind a sustainable service. We have also ramped up our work on mental health in our READY+ programme, which reached 20,000 young people with holistic and integrated HIV care in 2020. This programme carried out an evidence review into ‘What works’ to support the Mental Health of Young People Living with HIV in 2020. The community adolescent treatment supporters (CATS) model, which the READY approach builds upon and was pioneered by our partner Africaid-Zvandiri, has been recognised as being significantly more effective in preventing viral load failure than standard models.
Percentage of 'like to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Action 9 COMMUNITY SYSTEMS: Strengthen community and national health systems and structures to ensure that sustainable, inclusive and evidence-based HIV prevention, treatment and care services are integral to Universal Health Coverage and social support programmes, with full financing by national governments following transition from donor support.
Percentage of 'expect to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Through our PITCH programme we have supported communities to make their voices heard in key Univeral Health Coverage (UHC) decision-making spaces so that national UHC health plans and policies consider their particular needs and circumstances.
Under PITCH, we worked with 31 community-based organisations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria and Zimbabwe to strengthen their knowledge on health financing and budget advocacy. This included the development of policy briefs and situational analyses to better understand how resources are being allocated. The partners were then able to take part in round table discussions with key decision makers to engage more closely with national and regional processes, thereby widening their sphere of influence.
Percentage of 'like to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Action 10 DEVELOPING LEADERS: Develop a new generation of leaders and activities who advocate for the right to good health and well-being for all and who meaningfully participate in, and lead, the HIV response.
Percentage of 'expect to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
Due to COVID-19, this action was deprioritised in 2020
Percentage of 'like to see' progress markers fully achieved
Our results framework is based on an Outcome Mapping approach. Instead of traditional indicators, we use progress markers to track progress towards the 10 actions that make our Global Plan of Action. They are slightly different to standard indicators as their strength lies in their use as a set, not individually, in illustrating the complexity and logic of the change process (setting out what changes we expect to see, what we’d like to see and what we’d love to see). Progress against our markers can be recorded as low, medium or full. In most cases this reflects the number of partners or countries where changes have been observed so is an illustration of the breadth of our work.
GB-CHC-1038860-4000004166
Frontline AIDS
Resilient & Empowered Adolescents & Young People, READY+ Phase II
READY is a movement of youth-led and youth serving organisations working with and for adolescents and young people living with and affected by HIV. It targets adolescents and young people in their diversity, to empower them to influence the decisions that affect their sexual and reproductive health and rights.
READY+ is part of a portfolio of programmes designed to build Resilient and Empowered Adolescents and Young people (READY). The first phase of the six-year programme (2021-2026) worked with and for young people living with HIV in Mozambique, eSwatini, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Its focus was on increasing access to holistic care and support: promoting not only sexual and reproductive health and rights but also mental health in order to foster resilience. A key part of the project are the CATS (Community Adolescent Treatment Supporters) who provide peer to peer information, counselling, and support.
READY+ 2 is a six-year programme (2021 – 2026) that will build upon this work and expand its reach into Angola, Malawi, and Zambia, with increased focus on creating a strengthened youth centred implementation model, gender norms transformation, advocacy and movement building. The programme will be delivered using a multi-layered approach, incorporating lessons learnt from READY+. The programme will directly reach over 35,000 adolescents and young people living with or most affected by HIV. It will support them to become more resilient, empowered and knowledgeable and to have the bodily autonomy, freedom and agency to realise their sexual and reproductive health and rights.
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Paediatric AIDS Treatment for Africa (PATA)
Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative (REPSSI)
Coordinating Assembly of NGOs (CANGO)
AFRICAID
Stichting Global Network of Young People Y+Global
mail@aidsalliance.org
http://www.aidsalliance.org/our-priorities/current-projects/831-resilient-empowered-adolescents-and-young-people-ready
2912962
3557937.72
3644354.53
3503165
3342757.22
3376794.61
2508118
Funding received from donor
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
-12192.54
Decommit Partner SGA 2021
Frontline AIDS
Y+
-14475.83
Decommit Partner SGA 2021
Frontline AIDS
PATA
-148496.21
Decommit Partner SGA 2021
Frontline AIDS
Africaid
87176.88
Frontline AIDS HQ Costs
Frontline AIDS
Frontline Global
95773.9
Frontline AIDS HQ Costs
Frontline AIDS
Frontline Global
129157.11
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
Africaid
545939.41
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
CANGO
1297635.1
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
CANGO
124299.32
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
PATA
117672.82
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
PATA
270846.96
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
REPSSI
30147.46
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
Y+
117105.58
Partner SGA 2022 Amendment
Frontline AIDS
Africaid
276504.62
Partner SGA 2022 Amendment
Frontline AIDS
CANGO
39582.34
Partner SGA 2022 Amendment
Frontline AIDS
PATA
52880
Partner SGA 2022 Amendment
Frontline AIDS
REPSSI
73219.97
Partner SGA 2022 Amendment
Frontline AIDS
Y+
102947
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
Africaid
173234.65
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
Africaid
1238415.3
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
CANGO
1148139.11
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
CANGO
132633.7
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
PATA
110320.62
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
PATA
166329.98
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
REPSSI
304272.21
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
REPSSI
77302.91
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
Y+
136082.6
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
Y+
223992.97
Frontline AIDS HQ Costs
Frontline AIDS
Frontline Global
232568.08
Frontline AIDS HQ Costs
Frontline AIDS
Frontline Global
2912962
Funding received from donor
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
452806.72
Partner SGA 2021
Frontline AIDS
Africaid
-206685.83
Decommit Partner SGA 2021
Frontline AIDS
REPSSI
4555824
Partner SGA 2022
Frontline AIDS
CANGO
87916.84
Frontline AIDS HQ Costs
Frontline AIDS
Frontline Global
321200.49
Frontline AIDS HQ Costs
Frontline AIDS
Frontline Global
16853442
Buza Commitment
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
68301.85
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
Africaid
50101.69
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
Africaid
189105.14
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
Africaid
851453.28
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
CANGO
165350.7
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
REPSSI
287953.62
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
REPSSI
461467.84
Partner SGA 2022
Frontline AIDS
Africaid
272586.21
Partner SGA 2022
Frontline AIDS
Y+
172100
Partner SGA 2021
Frontline AIDS
Y+
938991.5
Partner SGA 2022
Frontline AIDS
REPSSI
63627.99
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
Y+
891298.81
Partner SGA 2021
Frontline AIDS
REPSSI
61821.32
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
Y+
72036.4
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
PATA
319517.70
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
REPSSI
74124.04
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
PATA
385729
Partner SGA 2022
Frontline AIDS
PATA
340492.8
Partner SGA 2021
Frontline AIDS
PATA
977449.21
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
CANGO
2921855.43
Partner SGA 2021
Frontline AIDS
CANGO
-366149.6
Decommit Partner SGA 2021
Frontline AIDS
CANGO
3484529
Buza Commitment Top Up
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Frontline AIDS
14121.6
Partner Disbursement
Frontline AIDS
Y+
Outcome 1
Powerful Adolescents
1a) Proportion of adolescent and young people confident to seek sexual and reproductive health information and services.
This indicator measures the self-efficacy and perception of access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information and services among individuals aged 10 – 24 years. It is primarily a measure of self-efficacy.
Examples of SRH information and services can include:
• Information on condom use, contraception, pregnancy, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV and services that are available for further support such as:
• Provision of family planning counseling and methods
• STI/HIV counseling, testing and treatment
• HIV prevention (especially mother to children)
• Antenatal and postnatal care for young mothers
• Counseling and treatment for sexual and gender-based violence
• Psychosocial care and support from service providers and peers which could
include:
• Referrals to psychological care, nutritional support, livelihood projects, LifeSkills
interventions, parenting sessions and networking or support groups to support
adherence and mental wellbeing
• Follow up and lost to care support engagements and adherence tracking
Support and information on prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections (OIs) and alleviation of HIV related symptoms and pain, treatment of HIV related wellbeing issues such as depression, anxiety and coping.
Self-report from surveys indicating a yes/no response to whether or not they feel they could access SRH information and services. This data could also be disaggregated by location, sex, socioeconomic status, marital status, and educational attainment. The questionnaire can ask about specific information and services (i.e., if the respondent felt they could obtain condoms or if they could attend a voluntary counseling and testing site to seek information and/or testing on HIV). Evaluators may want to disaggregate by the following age ranges: 10-14, 15-19, and 20– 24. Similar to the Demographic and Health Surveys/AIDS Indicator Survey (DHS/AIS) “perception of access to condoms by young people”, this indicator measures the prevalence of perceived access to SRH information and services among youth and isconsidered important to monitor as a determinant of SRH information and service use, as it assesses the reported self-efficacy of young people for accessing SRH information, support and service use if they were to need them (WHO 2007).
It is a usefulintermediate measurement between knowledge of SRH information and services and their actual use as it could predict the behavior of SRH service utilization. This can also be used as a measure of effectiveness of outreach from youth-friendly RH services, peer-education, or other communication aimed at educating adolescents have been in making their services known, available and accessible.
The baseline values were collected in 2021 and te follow up data will becollected at midterm and end of programme.
1b) Percentage of women and men, aged 15–29, who report discriminatory attitudes towards people living with HIV.
This indicator measures progress towards reducing discriminatory attitudes and support for discriminatory policies. Discrimination is a human rights violation prohibited by international human rights law and most national constitutions. Discrimination in the context of HIV refers to unfair or unjust treatment (an act or an omission) of an individual based on his or her real or perceived HIV status. Discrimination exacerbates risks and deprives people of their rights and entitlements, fueling the HIV epidemic. This indicator does not directly measure discrimination but rather measures discriminatory attitudes that may result in discriminatory acts (or omissions) such as: neglect, exploitation, abuse (both physical and emotional) or accidental disclosure of HIV status.
One item in the indicator measures the potential support by respondents for discrimination that takes place at an institution, family /household and community levels and the other measures social distancing or behavioural expressions of prejudice. The composite indicator can be monitored as a measure of a key manifestation of HIV-related stigma and the potential for HIV-related discrimination within the general population. This indicator could provide further understanding and improve interventions in HIV discrimination by: showing change over time in the percentage of people with discriminatory attitudes; allowing comparisons between national, provincial, state and more local administrations; and indicating priority areas for action.
The baseline values were collected in 2021 and te follow up data will becollected at midterm and end of programme.
1c) Percentage of AYPLHIV who express equitable gender norms.
Social norms around sex and relationships that promote gender inequality, such as those that encourage men to maintain control over the behavior of their female partners, can increase both young men and young women’s risk of STIs, HIV, and partner violence, as well as risk for unplanned pregnancies. Therefore, transforming inequitable gender norms (i.e., societal messages that dictate appropriate or expected behavior for males and females) is increasingly recognized as an important strategy to counter the spread of HIV and generally improve reproductive health (Promundo, UNFPA, MenEngage, 2010). This is an indicator that aims to measure attitudes towards expression of equitable gender norms in making decisions in sex and intimate relationship. The indicator is designed to provide information about the prevailing gender norms in a community, in addition to the effectiveness of programmes that seek to influence them.
The baseline values were collected in 2021 and te follow up data will becollected at midterm and end of programme.
1d) Proportion of women aged 15–29 years who make their own informed decisions regarding sexual relations, contraceptive use and reproductive health care.
Women’s and girls’ autonomy in decision making over consensual sexual relations, contraceptive use and access to sexual and reproductive health services is key to their empowerment and the full exercise of their reproductive rights. A woman’s ability to say “no” to her husband/partner if she does not want to have sexual intercourse is well aligned with the concept of sexual autonomy and women’s empowerment. Regarding decision-making on use of contraception, the expert views as well as the initial data charts for several countries indicated that a clearer understanding of women empowerment is obtained by looking at the indicator from the perspective of decisions being made “mainly by the partner”, as opposed to decision being made “by the woman alone” or “by the woman jointly with the partner”. Depending in the type of contraceptive method being used, a decision by the woman “alone” or “jointly with the partner” does not always entail that the woman is empowered or has bargaining skills. Conversely, it is safe to assume that a woman that does not participate, at all, in making contraceptive choices is disempowered as far as sexual and reproductive decisions are concerned. Women who
make their own decision regarding seeking healthcare for themselves are considered empowered to exercise their reproductive rights.
Proportion of women aged 15 – 29 years (married or in union) who make their own decision on all three selected areas i.e. can say no to sexual intercourse with their husband or partner if they do not want; decide on use of contraception; and decide on their own health care. Only women who provide a “yes” answer to all three components are considered as women who “make her own decisions regarding sexual and reproductive”. Whilst the aspiration of the indicator is to measure, among the three components, women’s decision –making on reproductive health care, current data provides information on women’s decision- making on health care in general.
The baseline values were collected in 2021 and te follow up data will becollected at midterm and end of programme.
1e) Percentage and number of young vulnerable people who indicate that they do make healthy choices on SRHR.
This indicator measures the number and percentage of young vulnerable people making healthy choices on SRHR.
Vulnerability: defined as young people who are at risk of being exposed to inequality, violence, exclusion, discrimination or harmful norms. Healthy choices on SRHR: Ability to access and make informed and nonharmful decisions and actions towards their psychosocial, mental health and wellbeing.
The baseline values were collected in 2021 and te follow up data will becollected at midterm and end of programme.
1f) Percentage of AYPLHIV surveyed with improved comfort in speaking to others about HIV
This indicator is measuring the ability and confidence of AYPLHIV in speaking to others about HIV following the empowerment, exposure and access to the services provided in the project area.
The baseline values were collected in 2021 and te follow up data will becollected at midterm and end of programme.
1g) Total cost per beneficiary.
This indicator measures the total cost (USD) spent in reaching each beneficiary.
The average cost per beneficiary recorded during this reporting period is US$160
1h) Number of sexuality and life skills training tools developed.
CSE and life skills tools that have been developed/adapted during READY+ Phase I will be rolled-out in the existing sites and introduced in the new sites/districts, aimed at HIV prevention, and supporting those living with HIV. Information will focus on gender, the definition of SRHR and how to access relevant services, mental health and well-being, preventing and addressing violence. In addition to the gender tools, other tools will include Frontline AIDS’s revised SRHR 101 Workshop Guide which has specific components on mental health and gender norms transformation, the Sexuality and Life Skills Toolkit to facilitate participatory learning activities with adolescents and young people and REPSSI’s
new tools Flip It and Aunty Nomsa.This is an output indicator covering both adapted and new tools, provided that the tool has been updated/tailored through the READY+ programme and young people were involved.
1i) Number of peer supporters (CATS) trained and mentored disaggregated by type of training: youth friendly SRHR and HIV service provision for AYPLHIV; sexuality/life skills tools; Young Peer Mothers
CATS will continue to be supported and championed in existing sites and identified/trained in new ones to provide tailored, age-appropriate support to AYPLHIV in community and clinical settings. As many CATS in READY+ will be graduating, new CATS will be selected and trained. The training will be based on Africaid-Zvandiri training with PSS from REPSSI and collaboration with health facilities from PATA. To ensure the CATS model continues to be a truly peer counselling/educator model, efforts will be made to identify CATS who can support/meet the needs of young people in all their diversity i.e. those selling sex, young people with diverse sexual orientations and gender
non-conforming (GNC) young people. This indicator counts the number of individuals participating in training sessions (the full two weeks training to include a 5-day in-class training and 5-day health facility attachment for CATS and an additional 3 days for Young Mentor Mothers Training (YMM) that needs to be completed) to provide peer support either at the community or health facility level. Africaid/Zvandiri are leading the training workshops and therefore, will be responsible for the CATS training data collection forms although each country will be responsible for entering their own data into Wanda. In addition to the training workshops registers, data on participant’s feedback i.e., levels of satisfaction with training should also be included as good practice and this may also be used in narrative reporting.
1j) Number and percentage of peer supporters retained within the programme
This is an output indicator covering both adapted and new tools, provided that the tool has been updated/tailored through the project and young people were involved. Indicator refers to tools that would be used within support groups/youth groups, 33 etc. and therefore, use/dissemination of these tools will be indirectly counted through 1h.
1k) Number of AYPLHIV reached with comprehensive, correct information on sexuality, HIV/AIDS, STIs, pregnancy and contraception through group safe spaces.
This is a coverage indicator on participation in new safe spaces/sessions for specific groups who require more focused support. These will include: (i) Young Peer Mothers groups to support and prioritise young mothers in READY+ programming. Working with IPs, Zvandiri and PATA will identify and train 20 Young Peer Mothers/country using Zvandiri’s ‘Young Mother Mentors’ approach and PATA’s Ask-Boost-Connect-Discuss (ABCD) methodology to ensure treatment adherence and support for maternal depression and adolescent mental health and well-being, which has come up as a key issue. Additionally, (ii) dedicated space for young boys to promote their greater engagement in SRHR will also be introduced bringing in partners such as Kwakha Indvodza ‘building a man’ in Eswatini that specialises in promoting community health and behaviour change interventions with men and boys. Lastly, (iii) safe spaces will also be introduced for the more vulnerable AYPLHIV such as young people who sell sex, diverse sexual orientations and GNC people too e.g., trans youth, lesbian, and bisexual
adolescents. Indicator counts the number of unique AYPLHIV reached within each group over the programme duration. Examples of group safe spaces:
• Small group discussions in youth clubs, support groups or teen clubs
• Educational sessions (for example, life skills education in schools and health
education in facilities)
• Online safe spaces such as Facebook or WhatsApp discussion groups
This indicator DOES NOT count individuals reached through mass channels, including public events and media. Participation in an online safe space/s should be counted as the number of people who have liked, posted, or commented within the time period; membership of a group alone is not sufficient. For WhatsApp or Zoom support group sessions attendance registers should be completed by the person conducting the session and any new persons to the group safe space should be noted for data entry purposes into Wanda.
1l) Number of pregnant and breastfeeding adolescents and young women attending quarterly mother/baby pair support groups.
Pregnant and breast-feeding adolescents and young women are those beneficiaries that will be under the support of YMM and the indicator will count those who are attending the support groups for the first time. This indicator measures unique pregnant and breastfeeding adolescents and young women NOT the number of times they have attended the support groups. Thus records of attendance, should be clear to indicate ongoing vs new membership. Key requirements on this indicator would be data sources on registration and participation records checks. Country leads will collate, verify and enter the data on Wanda.
1m) Number of AYPLHIV reached peer-led support services through community outreach.
1n) Number of mother/baby pairs being supported by Young Peer Mothers.
This indicator counts the number of individuals whoare yo8ng mothers who have been supported through peer-led interventions from young peer mothers.
Outcome 2
Supportive and Safe Communities
2a) Percentage of young vulnerable people that report access to responsive community support systems.
This indicator aims to measure the percentage of young vulnerable people that have been sensitized, informed, supported and empowered to successfully access community support services on HIV, SRH and mental health. Key to this indicator is the evidence of change in the delivery and access to youth friendly community services availability, attitudes of the service providers and the effectiveness of the READY+ interventions that seek influence them.
The baseline values were collected in 2021 and te follow up data will becollected at midterm and end of programme.
2b) Community members /family surveyed reporting gender equitable norms.
This indicator aims to measure how the efforts in the transformation of inequitable gender norms would have affected attitudes of the community towards expression of equitable gender norms within the community. It is designed to provide information about the prevailing gender norms in a community and in addition the effectiveness of programmes that seek to influence them.
2c) Percentage of adolescents participating in community forums
This indicator seeks to measure the percentage of adolescents that feel empowered, safe and confident enough to participate in community forums on issues pertaining to their safety, health and psychosocial wellbeing.
2d) Number of community action plans successfully implemented.
This indicator aims to measure how the efforts in the transformation of inequitable gender norms would have affected attitudes of the community Community Action Plans are written agreed actions following a community dialogue, or community forum to address an issue or issues affecting the promotion of the rights, health, and well-being of A&YPLHIV and support their access to SRHR information, services and the needed psychosocial support. These action plans are a simple clear realistic achievable road map with a selected/ appointed lead responsibility to each action. The plan should have clear timelines and deliverables This indicator thus measures progress towards the implementation based on the deliverables, level of effort as well as results of actions taken up by the community.
2e) Proportion of community members attending dialogues surveyed demonstrating support for the needs, rights and experiences of AYPLHIV in relation gender-based violence, SRHR and HIV.
This indicator will measure the proportion of community members attending dialogues surveyed demonstrating support for the needs, rights and experiences of AYPLHIV in relation gender-based violence, SRHR and HIV.
The baseline values were collected in 2021 and te follow up data will becollected at midterm and end of programme.
2f) Percentage of parents/caregivers sensitised who report increased levels of comfort and confidence communicating on SRHR, Gender, GBV issues with their children.
This indicator measures the percentage of parents/ caregivers in the project area who have been sensitized on issues concerning, HIV, SRH, Gender, GBV issues and how to communicate as well as support their children access available services. The indicator is designed to provide information level of support, confidence and comfort in communicating on sensitive issues pertaining to gender, HIV, SRH with their children.
The baseline values were collected in 2021 and te follow up data will becollected at midterm and end of programme.
2g) Number of individuals participating in dialogues conducted disaggregated by type of service provider, AYPLHIV, services providers, faith leaders, police, schoolteachers/authorities and
other gate keepers.
This is a coverage indicator which cumulatively counts the total number of people participating in community dialogues focusing on influential group members and opinion leaders, community custodians, gatekeepers (including young people) and potential action triggers on the READY+ agenda to advance and promote gender equality, sexual and reproductive health and rights and well-being of A&YPLHIV. This could include parents, community/religious leaders, medical staff, police, ministry officials and parliamentarians and other community service providers working towards addressing the needs and priorities of A&YPLHIV in the context of sexual health.
There were no dialogues conducted during the reporting period.
2h) Number of faith/religious leaders participating in a training of trainers on the adopted masculinities and faith disaggregated by religion.
This indicator counts the number of faith/religious leaders participating in a training of trainers on the adopted masculinities and faith. The indicator counts the number of unique faith/religious leaders participating in a training of trainers.
The training will be carried out in the next reporting period as the manual was developed in 2021.
2i) Number of parents /caregivers sensitised and supported in communicating on SRHR, Gender, GBV issues with their children by IPs and peer supporters.
This indicator counts the number of faith/religious leaders participating in a training of trainers on the adopted masculinities and faith. The indicator counts the number of unique faith/religious leaders participating in a training of trainers.
2j) One stigma campaign developed and rolled out.
Outcome 3
Access to high quality adolescent tailored HIV/SRHR services
3a) Proportion of health service sites successfully actioning their service quality improvement plans.
This indicator monitors the proportion of health service sites successfully actioning their service quality improvement plans based on the agreed requirements.
3b) Percentage of health facilities offering youth friendly SRHR, HIV and/or GBV services responsive to the needs of young vulnerable people.
The baseline values were collected in 2021 and te follow up data will becollected at midterm and end of programme.
3c) Percentage and number of AYPLHIV (including young mothers) who have suppressed viral loads at the end of the reporting period.
3d) Percentage of AYPLHIV (including young mothers) surveyed who report positive social and mental well-being.
This indicator accounts for the number of people who were screened for mental health disorders.
3e) Levels of satisfaction reported by AYPLHIV of the quality, responsiveness, appropriateness and respectfulness of SRHR and HIV services they have used
This indicator measures the levels of satisfaction of A&YPLHIV as a critical component of quality SRHR and HIV services that they receive both at health facility level. The perception of an A&YPLHIV on the service provider's performance is measured to determine whether it meets or exceeds his or her expectations.
The Advocacy Lead (Y+) and PATA are responsible for managing this indicator. PATA will work with Y+ to introduce Charter and scorecard to health facilities. CATS will implement scorecard, with support from IPs & Y+.
The baseline values were collected in 2021 and te follow up data will becollected at midterm and end of programme.
3f) Number of health service providers trained on HIV/SRHR integration and the rights of AYPLHIV to comprehensive SRHR.
This indicator counts the number of health service providers trained on HIV/SRHR integration and the rights of AYPLHIV to comprehensive SRHR. The indicator counts the number of unique health service providers trained.
3g) Number of health champions supported and trained to critically advocate for issues, service delivery improvements and stronger policies for AYPLHIV.
This indicator counts the number of health champions trained to critically advocate for issues, service delivery improvements and stronger policies for AYPLHIV. The indicator counts the number of unique health champions trained.
3h) Number of coordination meetings with the Ministries conducted.
This indicator counts the number of meetings conducted with representatives of the Ministry of Health on service quality improvement.
3i) Number of health service providers trained on the clinic community/CBO (C3) methodology.
This indicator counts the number of health service providers trained on C3 methodlogy. The indicator counts the number of unique health service providers trained.
Outcome 4
Accountability
4a)
This indicator measures evidenced changes that happened as the result of activities measured. Examples of such changes could be inclusion of young key population SRHR and HIV priorities and needs in national and district-level strategies (i.e. the greater visibility of adolescent girls and young women in the advocacy environment, or greater donor attention to a particular issue affecting adolescents and young people, national strategic plans, Adolescent Health, Global Fund grant documents), increase of funding allocations for young key population SRHR/HIV services and inclusion (i.e. in district/national health and development budgets, Global Fund allocation, other donor-supported programmes) and translation of policy and advocacy asks into programming (i.e. more youth-friendly services, greater involvement of young people in decision-making and programming).
4b) Advocacy logs showing evidence of the implementation of advocacy plans.
4c) Y+ Global and other national chapters successfully completing
organisational development processes based on their capacity assessment result.
This indicator counts the number young people national chapters and Y+ Global which would have successfully completed organisational development processes based on their capacity assessment result.
4d) One READY movement building strategy developed and implemented.
This indicator counts the number young people national chapters and Y+ Global which would have successfully completed organisational development processes based on their capacity assessment result.
4e) Number of governments and regional entities in targeted countries successfully lobbied for scale up of the READY+ model.
organisational development processes based on their capacity assessment result.
The governments and regional entities that will be successfully lobbied for the scale up of the READY+ model and this is well documented will be counted.
4f) Number of SRHR shadow reports developed by young advocates and consortium partners, including advocacy recommendations and plans
This indicator countrs the number of SRHR shadow reports developed by young advocates and consortium partners, including advocacy recommendations and plans
4g) Y+ Global and other national chapters who complete the capacity assessments.
organisational development processes based on their capacity assessment result.
This indicator countrs the number of networks who complete capacity assessments
4h) Number of youth leaders trained and mentored to advocate at national, regional and global levels through the READY Academy disaggregated by mode of training, type of training and country.
This indicator counts the number youth leaders trained to advocate at national, regional, and global levels through the READY Academy. The indicator counts the number of unique youth leaders trained and mentored.
4i) Number of global, regional and national advocacy strategies developed and implemented.
This indicator counts whether national advocacy strategies have been developed and implemented
Outcome 5
Improved Skills and Better Choices/Options
5a) Percentage of young vulnerable people who have been empowered with integrated skills training (entrepreneurship, vocational training, and psychosocial life skills
training).
In READY+ economic empowerment is defined as the portfolio of sustainable integrated strategies and interventions that reduce the economic and social vulnerability of young people. This indicator therefore aims at measuring the percentage of young vulnerable people who have been from the range of integrated skills training package (entrepreneurship, vocational training and psychosocial lifeskills)
5b) Percentage of beneficiaries with access to more income
generating opportunities.
training).
The indicator measures beneficiaries of the project who are realizing any financial income (in monetary value) as a result of being employed whether informally or formally and/or are running their own businesses.
5c) Proportion of beneficiaries successfully enrolled in integrated skills training programmes e.g. Young Africa centres
This indicator measures the proportion of young people that have been enrolled in integrated skills training programmes with the support of READY+ interventions.
5d) Proportion of functional Internal Savings and Lending schemes (ISALs) based on a functionality assessment.
This indicator measures the proportion of availability and accessibility of functional Internal Savings and Lending schemes (ISALs) for young vulnerable people on the programme.
5e) Number of beneficiaries successfully referred to
integrated skills training programmes e.g. Young Africa centres.
This indicator counts all the AYPLHIV eligible for integrated skills training programmes successfully referred. Unique individuals whose referral is successfully completed will be counted.
5f) Number of young people successfully referred for career guidance and planning e.g. Young Africa centres
This indicator counts all the young people referred for career guidance and planning. The indicator will count each unique young person successfully referred
5g) Number of groups formed by young people (including CATS) on Internal Savings and Lending schemes (ISALs).
This indicator counts all the groups formed by young people (including CATS) on Internal Savings and Lending schemes formed as per the implementation guidelines. The indicator will count each unique career plan developed.